3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

99 spec twins...and 15 psi..need more input.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #1  
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 7
From: Home of the Rolex 24
99 spec twins...and 15 psi..need more input.

My turbos are going and I have a chance to get a set of 99's for a very good price. Will be running 15 psi..non-seq. I have searched but wanted updated input from anybody running these @ higher boost levels.. If I had the $$ I would go single but don't so any input would be appreciated.. Thanks..
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:43 PM
  #2  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
From everything I've read, the newer twins aren't great for higher boost. Matter of fact it's common in Japan to take the "high-power" turbos off and switch to the "low-power" turbos if you plan on running a lot of boost.

15psi will likely be pushing your luck on the '99s. Again, I don't have super hard evidence, so YMMV.

Dale
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:48 PM
  #3  
alberto_mg's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
From: nyc+li, ny
SleepR1 used to run the 99s at 15psi.

If you are looking to run non-seq, why don't you look for a set of BNRs?
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #4  
Hyperite's Avatar
Vagina Junction
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by alberto_mg
If you are looking to run non-seq, why don't you look for a set of BNRs?
Originally Posted by G's 3rd Gen
I have a chance to get a set of 99's for a very good price.
Probably cash driven.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 7
From: Home of the Rolex 24
yea.....id go single..if i had the $$ for spankin new ones..thanks for input
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:09 PM
  #6  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
How much are you going to actually be boosting 15 psi? Once a day? Couple of times a week?

They should hold up fine for at least a few years unless you are beating on them everyday.

If you are budget driven, perhaps you should reconsider running at 15 psi....
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #7  
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 7
From: Home of the Rolex 24
its a weekend driver....everything is set-up to run alot of boost.. not really budget driven.. but 500 for a decent set of used as oppose to 2000k+ right now is more theoretical to me. bnrs have crossed my mind thogh..
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #8  
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 7
From: Home of the Rolex 24
its a weekend driver....everything is set-up to run alot of boost.. not really budget driven.. but 500 for a decent set of used as oppose to 2000k+ right now is more theoretical to me. bnrs have crossed my mind though..
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #9  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Weekend driver only? I would definitely get the 99s for $500! Just make sure there is no shaft play and that the manifold isn't badly cracked, especially around the pre-control door and bridge piece. Hairline cracks are normal and acceptable, as long as they don't go past the gasket.
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 11:12 AM
  #10  
Railgun's Avatar
I won't let go
Veteran: Marine Corp
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 23
From: Chi -> Maidstone
I had some middle mileage (about 40k) stock twins running at 15 with no issues. Other than some quirks with the sequential system itself, they were perfect. But...I ended up going single anyway.
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #11  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally Posted by alberto_mg
SleepR1 used to run the 99s at 15psi.

If you are looking to run non-seq, why don't you look for a set of BNRs?
Yes, 15 psi on the street (370 rwhp) and 11 psi on the track (320 rwhp). Loved the sequential setup!

Dialed the boost down to 10 psi when the new motor was installed way back in Oct 2004.
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 01:00 AM
  #12  
EMPi71's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Coatesville, PA
SleepR1, what were all your mods back then?
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 01:21 AM
  #13  
SPOautos's Avatar
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
From: Bimingham, AL
If they were on a engine that ever blew up they are junk and not even worth $500. I'm sure it has been which is why they are selling them for $500.

Shaft play alone wont tell you if they are good. When you blow an engine pieces of apex seal go thru the turbine wheel and kill it. The ONLY way to tell if that has happened is to take apart the turnbing side of the turbos so you can see the wheel and shaft.

There is no real difference in those turbo versus the 93-95 turbos. They still have all the same weak points.

Stephen
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 04:26 AM
  #14  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Good point, Stephen, I didn't think about the possibility of damaged turbine wheels. You think I would have with Bajaman's recent post!

BTW, Stephen, Bryan's making me a set of Stage 3s....you and Rich convinced me...
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 07:23 AM
  #15  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally Posted by EMPi71
SleepR1, what were all your mods back then?
Ask Alberto...
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #16  
7racer's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 10
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by SleepR1
Ask Alberto...

Sleep,

good to see you stop by on the forum every once and awhile!

How's the BMW?
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 01:47 PM
  #17  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
M3/4's great. Love the low-end torque. I see why these cars are great autocross cars. I got the J-spec twins on my old Rx7 (now Alberto's) b/c I wanted that low-end throttle response. There's no replacement for normally aspirated low-end torque on demand. Even with the J-spec twins there was that split-second waiting, and then you got a rush of power. The NA BMW 3.2-L I6 (with Dinan intake and exhaust) is very linear in throttle response, and much easier to drive at the limit. For grins and giggles, I turn the ASC off, and drift the M3 around. Pisses my wife off though LOL

Peace.

-M
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotary12Ahead
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
9
Oct 29, 2015 03:16 PM
edgars95rx7
Link Vi-PEC
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.