3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

99+ Spec Turbo's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-02, 05:35 AM
  #26  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
SleepR1,

The later FDs used a restriction in the nipple instead of the pill. You should be able to reuse your old pills or at the worst get a similar sized carb jet for your hoses.

Some people are happy with the PFC as a boost controller and some aren't. Many people have problems getting consistent boost because the PFC doesn't control the wastegate from a specified boost setting. It controls it from a user-entered duty cycle. Obviously, this has disadvantages because you will get different levels of boost with different weather conditions. A dedicated boost controller should be more stable and consistent.
Old 11-22-02, 08:56 AM
  #27  
ech
Senior Member

 
ech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SleepR1 - you don't need to reuse pills. There is a built-in restrictor in each of the nipples on the turbos housing. If you pull off the hoses and poke a 1/16" drill bit into each one you will find that the bit just fits into one, and won't quite fit into the other. Adding pills shouldn't hurt anything but they won't help either - and might slow down the response a tiny bit.

I use the PFC to control boost on the '99 turbos, no issues.

---------------
rynberg - while I agree with your assertion that some are happy with the PFC boost control, and some aren't - I think your other info is slightly wrong. The PFC uses BOTH a specified boost setting, AND a base duty cycle. The PFC starts with the specified duty cycle, and then adjusts it real-time to try to attain the specified boost level. I've logged the WG and PC duty cycles with boost numbers and have watched this happen.

If the user sets the "base duty" too far away then the PFC won't get to the target boot numbers. There are also other circumstances, such as bad hoses, solenoids, boost leaks, etc. that will throw the PFC off.
Old 11-22-02, 10:13 AM
  #28  
Just Call Me Terminator!

iTrader: (4)
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by artguy
if you went with a t78 instead you could sell rides in it on ebay to pay for the parts!!

right vosko?

damn straight !!!!!
Old 11-22-02, 10:15 AM
  #29  
Just Call Me Terminator!

iTrader: (4)
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: vosko

Originally posted by SleepR1
That's quite right, vosko! As hard as I drive my FD on the track, only NEW twins will take the punishment of hard use.

Hmmm...maybe I'll get another 102,000 miles from the Japan spec twins eh??

I have an Anfini Y-pipe on order with Mazdaspeed Motorsports Develpment, so I'm doing the sequential turbos RIGHT this time

FWIW, I didn't "feel" any pill inside the wasteagate hoses...perhaps the J-specs don't come with a pill?

How does one control the boost with the J-specs and the Apexi FC commander? Do I need a stand alone boost controller to use with the Apexi PFC?? (sorry off-topic question).

also from what i've seen. rebuilt twins don't last nearly as long as new units...... for that reason before i decided to T78 i picked up a mint set of 30k mile stock turbos. more than one of my friends rebuilt twins starting puking oil after a few thousand miles after rebuild. twins aren't exactly easy to remove or cheap to rebuild. in the end you always get what you pay for....

maybe that clarifies it :p
Old 11-22-02, 11:17 AM
  #30  
The Spirit of FLUFF!

iTrader: (1)
 
RX7SpiritR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Highland, CA
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but I don't have the gobs of money required for a new set. Like I said I will pay the $500 for the slightly sued set from JT-Imports.com and then I will save up my money for osme new ones....dang!
Old 11-22-02, 12:50 PM
  #31  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ahh...money...you can never have enough!!!!
Old 11-22-02, 01:37 PM
  #32  
Just Call Me Terminator!

iTrader: (4)
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my motto is "debt you can never have enough"
Old 11-22-02, 03:03 PM
  #33  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by ech
rynberg - while I agree with your assertion that some are happy with the PFC boost control, and some aren't - I think your other info is slightly wrong. The PFC uses BOTH a specified boost setting, AND a base duty cycle. The PFC starts with the specified duty cycle, and then adjusts it real-time to try to attain the specified boost level. I've logged the WG and PC duty cycles with boost numbers and have watched this happen.

If the user sets the "base duty" too far away then the PFC won't get to the target boot numbers. There are also other circumstances, such as bad hoses, solenoids, boost leaks, etc. that will throw the PFC off.
Why is it so easy to overboost and hit fuel-cut with the PFC then? I know a few people that were constantly hitting fuel cut until they did enough mods to run 13-14 psi of boost. When they tried to control it to 11-12 psi, it kept overboosting when the weather changed. From most people's posts, I've seen that dedicated boost controllers are much less susceptable to changes in air temp, humidity, etc.

Just trying to get a better understanding of how the PFC actually works.
Old 11-22-02, 06:04 PM
  #34  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
10.5 psi

is all I plan to use, so hopefully I won't run into the overboosting issue...

Besides, how does the PFC commander hook up to a boost controller, unless you set the boost at a maximum of 10.5 psi, and the PFC, can never go beyond that preset boost levelt--is that right?
Old 11-22-02, 11:17 PM
  #35  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: 10.5 psi

Originally posted by SleepR1
is all I plan to use, so hopefully I won't run into the overboosting issue...

Besides, how does the PFC commander hook up to a boost controller, unless you set the boost at a maximum of 10.5 psi, and the PFC, can never go beyond that preset boost levelt--is that right?
Nope. If you boost 0.25 over the pre-set boost value, the PFC will fuel-cut. From my understanding, if you are using a boost controller with the PFC, you set the boost on the PFC to a higher number than your boost controller. For example, you set the boost controller to 11 psi and the PFC to 14 psi. This should make it impossible for the PFC to fuel-cut.
Old 12-03-02, 12:07 PM
  #36  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So in my case, eventhough I plan to use only 10.5 psi on the J-specs and ported KDR motor...I'll need to buy a separte boost controller, set that to 10, and set the PFC to 12 psi, to avoid fuel cut...damn that's goofy! Oh well, so long as it works.

So which boost controller works best with sequential twins, eh???

Last edited by SleepR1; 12-03-02 at 12:10 PM.
Old 12-03-02, 05:16 PM
  #37  
Just Call Me Terminator!

iTrader: (4)
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you don't need a boost controller. the PFC controls boost for the stock twins...............
Old 12-03-02, 05:39 PM
  #38  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
vosko, but I have '99 Japan spec twins???!!!
Old 12-03-02, 06:55 PM
  #39  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: sunnyvale, Ca
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with Vosko

I don't think you need a separate boost controller either. I run the P-Fc with stock twins (I know not the 99's and not street ported) and it works fine. I don't think the increase flow of the port or turbos will exceed the P-FC. I'd say dyno it and see if the A/F is OK. The extra boost controller seems like a waste of money to me.

2c
Old 12-03-02, 07:07 PM
  #40  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ok, nuff said...I won't waste the money on a stand-alone boost controller... I'll let the A'pexi do the controlling...sounds like a consensus to me

Now about this new engine torque brace the Rx7 Store sells...who has one and do you like it??
Old 01-12-03, 10:17 AM
  #41  
Thrashing your Roy score!


iTrader: (19)
 
laujesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,579
Received 66 Likes on 12 Posts
SleepR1- I doubt you will find anyone who doesnt like those braces. I cant speek for the price because I havent shopped them in the us.



Just to clear up some misunderstanding I saw earlier. The 99+ RS and the 99+ RZ turbos are one and the same, the 99+ "RB" turbos are the ones without the abraiseable compressor housings and the 265 power rating.

Not to self promote while threadjacking but... I have a set in like new shape for sale ...

Last edited by laujesse; 01-12-03 at 10:20 AM.
Old 01-12-03, 02:15 PM
  #42  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SleepR1
So in my case, eventhough I plan to use only 10.5 psi on the J-specs and ported KDR motor...I'll need to buy a separte boost controller, set that to 10, and set the PFC to 12 psi, to avoid fuel cut...damn that's goofy! Oh well, so long as it works.

So which boost controller works best with sequential twins, eh???
Sleep...

You can probably search for my screen name and the term "Fuel cut" or "Boost Cut". You will find all my agony. I have finally after about 60 passes at the drag strip figured out how to stop the fuel cut.

When I was set for 12 PSI and I would spike to 15 and then I would get a fuel cut. The power FC will NOT register your spikes even if you hit fuel cut. Anyway, before I may have setting like this..

.80 .68
.80 .78

This caused a fuel cut. I found that if I would make a change like this....

.80 .58
.85 .54

I would avoid my fuel cut all together. If you set your duty cycle back you will eventually get it to where it will not spike. The problem is if the weather changes you can spike again. Its a PIA, but you can work with it. I also found that the higher your boost and the lower your duty cycle=less chance to spike.
Old 10-28-03, 01:58 PM
  #43  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by ech
SleepR1 - you don't need to reuse pills. There is a built-in restrictor in each of the nipples on the turbos housing. If you pull off the hoses and poke a 1/16" drill bit into each one you will find that the bit just fits into one, and won't quite fit into the other. Adding pills shouldn't hurt anything but they won't help either - and might slow down the response a tiny bit.
ech, thanks for clearing up the nipple issue with the J-spec twins
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
01-30-19 06:31 AM



Quick Reply: 99+ Spec Turbo's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.