3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

50/50 weight balance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2004 | 06:20 AM
  #1  
blackmr2turbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
50/50 weight balance

do stock FD's have 50/50 weight balance? how would one go about reducing the total weight while maintaing the balance?

i know everyone would add a downpipe and maybe a mid-pipe, that's about a 20lb weight reduction right?
then maybe a CF hood to replace the stock AL hood, that would be a few pounds lighter right? then what else could you do? a CF hatch? seems like most lightweight aftermarket parts are for the front, what abou the rear other than a CF hatch?

I think someone would like to see some accurate numbers, post whatever you engineers out there know about this perfect weight distribution.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 06:43 AM
  #2  
pugg57's Avatar
proper motoring
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 1
From: USA
you can buy CF front bumper, front fenders, side skirts, rear fenders, hood, doors and rear bumper... not to mention spoiler, rear diffuser for more downforce front undertray, and front/side spliters. gut the interior (carpet etc.), ditch the seats and put in CF based momos... money is the limit. do a little research. all you have to do is google this crap and you can find it.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 06:46 AM
  #3  
RX7Wishing's Avatar
BOOOYAHHHH!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach
yes they have 50/50 balance. other then that i cant help you :p
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 07:06 AM
  #4  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Re: 50/50 weight balance

Originally posted by blackmr2turbo
how would one go about reducing the total weight while maintaing the balance?
Take off all the extra weight or replace with all the lightweight parts you want. Weigh car. Add concrete blocks to the light end.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #5  
PandazRx-7's Avatar
Fast + Reliable = $$$$$
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Funny...I was thinking about this yesterday. I'm a little worried because I have a roll bar that ways 70lbs+ that I'm going to install and I have already relocated the battery to the rear compartment. Seems this is going to alter the 50/50 stock ratio?? I'm seriously considering getting a CF Hatch to offset this. Think that would be a good idea guys?

Last edited by PandazRx-7; May 3, 2004 at 02:25 PM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 02:27 PM
  #6  
ttb's Avatar
ttb
No Cup Holder Racing
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
take out the spare
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 02:30 PM
  #7  
PandazRx-7's Avatar
Fast + Reliable = $$$$$
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally posted by ttb
take out the spare

Maybe not for a daily driver. But, I guess a high-flow cat and an aftermarket cat-back should help as well...
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 02:36 PM
  #8  
ijneb's Avatar
FOR SALE
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Why are you so worried about 50/50 anyway? I thought I read somewhere that it was more like 46/54 (front/back) to begin with. Thats probabily done with an empty gas tank, and no driver.

You'd want more weight on the drive tires (REAR) anyway. So moving the battery, adding a roll cage, downpipe and midpipe all add that little bit of weight to the back tires.


Of coarse, this is all my thoughts.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 03:26 PM
  #9  
r1dreamer's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Long Island NY
i really dont think that carbon fiber will alter the weight that much, maybe
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 03:26 PM
  #10  
r1dreamer's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Long Island NY
i really dont think that carbon fiber will alter the weight that much, maybe 5-10 pounds if you do the CF hood hatch and fenders, adn then you just spent thousands of dollars. mazda went crazy with the weight on these cars.
your not going to get much lighter unless you do single turbo exhaust battery no Ac Power steering, tings like that. al the body panels are lightweight aluminum. i honestly think CF is a waste on our cars. our hatch with the glass id say weighs about 15-20 pounds adn the hood weighs about 10. fenders are around 10 also.

does anyone know the actual weights of these parts?

i weighed in at 2620 with gas and the spare with nothing taken out of the car execpt the A/c becuase when i put the car back together after teh accident i didnt want to wait another day to get it on the road.

brandon

and this is a base model rx

Last edited by r1dreamer; May 3, 2004 at 03:36 PM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #11  
TracyRX7's Avatar
FD = Mr. Toad's Wild Ride
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
I asked on another thread about CF front fenders and CarbonCreations asked around the office and they weren't exactly sure but they thought about 5lbs less per fender.

The CF rear hatch (not sure if it is w/ lexan or stock glass window) was quoted as 60lbs less than the stock hatch.

I don't have any numbers for hoods, perhaps somebody else here does?
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #12  
WaLieN's Avatar
Call me gramps!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
If you wanted to lose some weight in the rear, you could always take out the spare tire (20lbs), replace the stock cat-back with something much lighter (I don't know the exact weight of the stock cb, but I know it's pretty heavy). Right there, you would lose 50lbs. If you wanted to go further, you could remove the carpet and replace the hatch with a lexan/cf, which would probably drop another 50lbs.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #13  
tt2323's Avatar
Import Connoisseur
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 1
From: All over the place
first you'll wanna look here good site:

http://www.mantissaracing.com/Mantis...eight_data.htm

you can save 60lbs with a full turbo back exhaust, gut the hatch with bose -50lbs remove airpump p/s a/c around 75 more pounds, lightweight battery -20 lbs

there thats over 200lbs already...carbon fiber isn't a cost effective way to lower the weight of an FD but removing all but whats necesary is!
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #14  
TracyRX7's Avatar
FD = Mr. Toad's Wild Ride
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
I believe the stock muffler is around 26lbs and the Dynomax Ultra Flo is around 9lbs.

I noticed on the FD of Andy and Teresa McKee (that is doing very well in SM2 on the Solo2 national tour) that all of the trunk and most of the interior panelling was replaced with CF. He said the car was down under 2500lbs. Thats pretty impressive weight loss since it still had a full functioning interior and I'm guessing gained some weight in the wheel/tire/brake combo over stock.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 04:28 PM
  #15  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Hands up... who can tell whether the car they're driving has 50/50 balance without a set of corner scales? That's what I thought.

People have been modifying these cars for years with impunity and having no trouble remaining competitive. I wouldn't worry about it or go to extreme lengths and expense to try to shave a few pounds with carbon fiber parts.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #16  
wingsfan's Avatar
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally posted by jimlab

I wouldn't worry about it or go to extreme lengths and expense to try to shave a few pounds with carbon fiber parts.
Yes, YOU would, if you thought it was a good idea But from a 50:50 standpoint, you're right, not worth the time/effort/expense.

My 50.2:49.8 distributed car seems to perform ok. It even comes with the Turbojeff endorsement
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #17  
911GT2's Avatar
The Power of 1.3
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
Originally posted by r1dreamer
al the body panels are lightweight aluminum. i honestly think CF is a waste on our cars.
Every body panel on our cars save the hood is sheet metal. Don't believe me? Take a magnet to your car, see which panels it sticks to.
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #18  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Your car is basically 50/50. If you lighten the front and it ends up as 48/52, you aren't going to care. 50/50 isn't necessarily the ideal that we sometimes percieve it to be. For instance, many racecars are designed to be 40/60. 50/50 is much better than 60/40, but I wouldn't add weight to the front of a car to get it back to 50/50 if it was a little heavier in the rear.

You can tell big differences in weight distribution. I am pretty sure I could guess within 5% on most cars after a little spirited driving. I think what you feel is where the CG is -- in front or behind you -- and it is fairly obvious when the difference is large (60/40 versus 50/10 versus 40/60). The hard part of setting that test up would be hiding where the engine noise is coming from.

All the body panels are sheet metal. The hood is aluminum and the rest are steel. CF and FG hoods are NOT significantly lighter than the stock hood. I know at least a few of them are heavier than the stock hood. Buy a hood for vents; not to save weight.

You could save some weight with CF parts to replace the steel. I don't doubt the CF hatch is a good bit lighter than the stock one, but the 60 lbs that was quoted is surely mostly because of the glass rather than the CF part.

Another weight issue to keep in mind is the polar moment of inertia. If you have a lot of weight at the extreme ends of the car (bumpers), it makes the car harder to rotate. Move the weight toward the center of the car to reduce the polar moment.

-Max
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 07:52 PM
  #19  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
the more weight you take off the front the faster you go.

forget 50-50... that's close to stock. my car is 48 front 52 rear. it doesn't have a spec of carbon fiber except in the brake pads. you won't materially relocate weight by switching materials... you need to take all the unnecessary junk out of the front of the car. and there is alot.

battery goes to the compartment behind the passenger. power steering goes in the trash. ac goes in the same barrel - just roll down the windows and drive fast. factory exhaust ditto. abs is 15 pounds of useless weight. there is an insulation pad on the underside of the hood, junk it as it keeps the aluminum hood from soaking up and dissapating the engine heat. fog lights go. etc etc

rule one: light is fast
rule two: front weight is the enemy.

howard coleman
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #20  
PandazRx-7's Avatar
Fast + Reliable = $$$$$
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Since were on the weight subject, I have a quick question... You know how the shop manuel says the front and rear height should be within 15 mm of each other, well I kinda like the more even look. So I dropped the rear about 10mm. Will 10mm make a big difference in the rear weight increasing or it's no big deal?
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 08:25 PM
  #21  
Rated R1's Avatar
Oji San
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, SC
I have heard that a carbon fiber hood is actually a little heavier than the stock aluminum one. Anybody got any hard facts on that?
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 08:26 PM
  #22  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
no big deal. i run 25 inches front and rear measured at the top of the wheel wells.

btw, lowering the rear decreases rear weight. since you are talking a small amount it isn't an issue.

anytime you materially raise or lower your car your camber will need to be adjusted.

howard coleman
Reply
Old May 4, 2004 | 01:11 AM
  #23  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Originally posted by 911GT2
Every body panel on our cars save the hood is sheet metal. Don't believe me? Take a magnet to your car, see which panels it sticks to.
The hood is sheetmetal also, it is just made with aluminum sheets instead of steel.
Reply
Old May 4, 2004 | 01:18 AM
  #24  
SpoolinRX's Avatar
OFENSIV
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 714
Likes: 1
From: N/A
^ yeah our hoods are light as hell
Reply
Old May 4, 2004 | 01:47 AM
  #25  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
The new Motor Trend (least favorite of the "big three" car mags but hey) shows some interesting weight bias data from Ferrari's research of their new Scaglietti. It was determined that 45/55 was the practical ideal for a front mid-engined car. Check it out.

Oh, and BTW, it fricking cracks me up that someone would spend significant coin to shave a few pounds. 90% of the forum wouldn't recognize a track (not strip) if it came up and bit them on the ***, let alone notice that the car is 3 lbs lighter from that new $1200 hatch...

Last edited by rynberg; May 4, 2004 at 01:49 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.