The numbers are REAL!!! I was there and will back it up. Great runs rikki, hopefully I will be there soon too. As you can see ON THE PIC the smoothing is set to 1 and correction is "STD" - standard. 100% legit run.

 

I'm definitely chill/calm man, its just a little tough to tell if someone is joking or not through typed words. And if he put 2000 rwhp down I'd care

 

So can we get the run down on the mods???

 

what glass man your now in phoenix when did you move, you got closer to me. lol.
Marc

 

Just hanging out here for now. I like it. Think I may move here. It would be nice to drive the FD year round. To bad I just took out the AC!!!

 

350 ain't nothing LOL

 

glass pmed you

 

GUys, PFS tuned my car with some plutonium and flux capacitors and I'm proud to say I've dynoed the highest ever for a stock twin setup. THese numbers are at 6 psi (I have a weird boost pattern problem... just imagine my numbers when I fix it!!).

Thanks. Attached file for those that think I'm BSing.

 

Damn i need to go to pfs. lol i like that Leprechaun. I still wanna believe ricki though i dont see any need for him to lie. Maybe im just to much of a honest person myself, but i think that those numbers are real. They are definalty acheavable.
Thasnk marc

 

Rikki, can you post your mods?

 

So wargasm did put it on tape. Hey man, I totally believe so it's cool. It's great you can do that. More power to you!

 

Great run rikki.
I'm curious as to what the A/F was this time? how about intake temps?

Danny

 

Maybe i'm blind but I couldn't find your mod list on your site. I was however a little surpised that you had Gordon Monsens car on your site with a very nice writeup.

 

I will keep this short and sweet so that I do not fan any flames.

1) I have no reason to lie and I have never been a PFS customer myself.

2) Everything I saw there today appeared 100% legitimate to me.

3) I am not on anyone's "side" in any of this. I went there today to observe and record the events. I don't need to be involved in a big forum flame war.

With that out of the way.... Here is a short video that I recorded. Based on the boost guage, it appears that it spikes up at 12 in the midrange, falls to 11, and then somewhere at 10.X at peak.

Encoded with divx ( http://www.divx.com/ ), 14 Megs, 1:35 runtime.

Please do a "save as"

http://www.zeroglabs.com/carmovies/m.../Ryan_Dyno.avi

Regards,
Brian

 

This was from when Rikki was a vocal critic of PFS. Then one day on this Forum, Rikki posted a bizarre, super long post taking everything he said back, and espousing the virtues of PFS, and the man - Peter Farrell. Ever since, Rikki has been PFS's spokesman and evangelist.

Just poking fun Rikki! Good numbers!

I dont think anybody really hates anybody, just a friendly competitive thing going on here.

BTW, his list is under Members Rides - Ryan.

 

that must be some pretty damn aggressive tuning.

hope the engine lasts you more than 1,000 miles!

 

From the website, PFS dp, mp, catback, cool air intake (PFS box with top off), PFS PMC, Pettit large IC with all the pipes, water and alternator pulley, act clutch, 9.5 flywheel, street port, non sequential turbos, removed egr valve and air pump, crane hi 6, ground wires, fuel pump.
With those mods, I still don't believe it at that psi, no way in hell. 34X rwhp at 13 psi maybe, but not at 10 or 11 psi.
BTW, with the turbos nonsequential, why does it still have the dip and rise at the transition point of 4500 rpms like they do when they are sequential?

What kind of dyno is that? Its not a dynojet, if so, its got a whole different screen set up than I've seen on a dynojet.

Tim - still doubtful and will pay for the dyno runs on a dynojet down the road.

 

Rikki, if you have some "secret" mods, it would be cool if you could just tell us. A lot of people aren't buying your numbers, but I don't think you're BSing us. I just wouldn't trust the dyno-run at PFS. It's only $50 or so to do a dyno run or two somewhere else. Also, like other people have asked, do you have the A/F ratio printout for that run?

 

hello. can someone tell the difference between STD, uncorrected, DIN, SAE, etc, on dynojet? Tim benton, that is dynojet, maybe it looks a little different because the font is a medium sized instead of small... but that is definitely the dynojet icons. here at our dyno machine, we always keep ours at SAE and smoothing set to 5. I also know that STD inflates the horsepower readings (anywhere from 10-30hp) the most out of all the choices (sometimes we print em out using STD just to make the customer happier, hehe). having said that, i don't know why some of you people are claiming ricki's numbers are BS when all you know is his mods and not one clue how his car is tuned. i say with good tuning, good dyno set up, and tweaking the dyno numbers afterwards (and i don't mean falsifying it with photoshop), that number is very possible.

 

I don't understand why you didn't bother going up to 14 or 15 psi. Surely you would have made more power, and even if you thought you would make just more torque why is that so bad on rotary???

 

Depending on the test conditions and other variables the corrected horespower could be off by more then 2 or 3 horsepower.