3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

3 rotor on Barrett Jackson

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 06:54 AM
  #26  
David Hayes's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,510
Likes: 188
From: FL
Originally Posted by Davin
whoa, i never imagined that it could go 200mph!
And that's no BS. Cam has had it that fast "racing" on 95 south of Miami.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 01:15 PM
  #27  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
so clean
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #28  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
"put the three rotor in it, put the twin turbos on it" bwahahahahahahaha!
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 03:39 AM
  #29  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Something has confused me here, i know its a late post and all but isn't twin turbo only capable of producing like 350-400 HP or less, I can't remember? Thanks.

thewird
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #30  
David Hayes's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,510
Likes: 188
From: FL
Originally Posted by thewird
Something has confused me here, i know its a late post and all but isn't twin turbo only capable of producing like 350-400 HP or less, I can't remember? Thanks.

thewird
Pettit claims 500 HP AT THE CRANK, not RWHP. That's about 425-450 RWHP depending on loss. My Pettit twin turbo setup "only" made 400 RWHP as the turbos wouldn't hold anymore than 12 lbs. of boost. Cam (Pettit) swore the car should do better than this but mine never did. I drove in the one he sold, however, and it seemed much faster than mine. I was actually gripping on to the passenger handle while Cam drove the car. Cam tells the story of racing a crotch-rocket biker on I95 and beating him and also racing a guy in a new Porsche turbo. He claims he buried the speedo during these runs. I would think this is true.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #31  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
12lbs in a 3 rotor will yield more power than 12lbs in a 2 rotor won't it? that might account for the extra bump the 20b gets. I'd like to see the cosmo flow maps.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #32  
David Hayes's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,510
Likes: 188
From: FL
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
12lbs in a 3 rotor will yield more power than 12lbs in a 2 rotor won't it? that might account for the extra bump the 20b gets. I'd like to see the cosmo flow maps.
Mosty definately. The 3 rotor will generate much more torque (at lower RPM ranges) and HP. The cosmo flow maps are not impressive though, at least not mine. The turbos reach max efficiency at about 5,000 RPM and run out of air from 5,500 RPM forward. The 20B should peak at about 7,000 - 7,500 RPM. The twins definately restrict the engine's performance. Would be interesting to see if the BNRs would work on the 20B.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #33  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
Originally Posted by David Hayes
Mosty definately. The 3 rotor will generate much more torque (at lower RPM ranges) and HP. The cosmo flow maps are not impressive though, at least not mine. The turbos reach max efficiency at about 5,000 RPM and run out of air from 5,500 RPM forward. The 20B should peak at about 7,000 - 7,500 RPM. The twins definately restrict the engine's performance. Would be interesting to see if the BNRs would work on the 20B.
That's something i was thinking. I see a lot of the 20b's are running single turbos so i'd like to compare the 20b flow map to the 13b. change one or both of my stock twins out for its 20b counterpart. maybe bnr would do a rebuild/upgrade on the 20b stockers?
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #34  
David Hayes's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,510
Likes: 188
From: FL
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
That's something i was thinking. I see a lot of the 20b's are running single turbos so i'd like to compare the 20b flow map to the 13b. change one or both of my stock twins out for its 20b counterpart. maybe bnr would do a rebuild/upgrade on the 20b stockers?
If you are thinking of doing this on a 13B, I wouldn't do it. I'm pretty sure about this - the 20B turbos are actually smaller (at least the secondary unit) than the 13B turbos. I also don't think the turbos would be a direct swap for your 13B. There are better ways to go (the BNRs) if you want to stay with the twins.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 09:02 AM
  #35  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
Originally Posted by David Hayes
If you are thinking of doing this on a 13B, I wouldn't do it. I'm pretty sure about this - the 20B turbos are actually smaller (at least the secondary unit) than the 13B turbos. I also don't think the turbos would be a direct swap for your 13B. There are better ways to go (the BNRs) if you want to stay with the twins.
Meh. So much for the novelty. It doesn't suprise me thought that they're smaller. If they were trying to keep the peak power down in the 280-300hp range they'd have to go with smaller turbos...which is probably why yours run out of breath at 5000 where mine i really starting to pull into their prime.

Given the availability of stock twin assy's you shouldn't have much trouble finding a core, and i bet the bolt patterns are the same too.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #36  
94RHDFD's Avatar
Formally 20b 3rd gen
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Back when I first got my 20B (about 5 years ago) I gave my stock turbos to Byran to see what he could do with them, but back then the 20b market was still somewhat new and everbody that was doing the conversion then wanted single turbos.


Originally Posted by David Hayes
Mosty definately. The 3 rotor will generate much more torque (at lower RPM ranges) and HP. The cosmo flow maps are not impressive though, at least not mine. The turbos reach max efficiency at about 5,000 RPM and run out of air from 5,500 RPM forward. The 20B should peak at about 7,000 - 7,500 RPM. The twins definately restrict the engine's performance. Would be interesting to see if the BNRs would work on the 20B.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #37  
pedro's Avatar
importdynamix2004
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 340
Likes: 1
From: tx
help please

Originally Posted by papsmagu
yeah that car is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fast, oh and it stops just as fast
hey i have a ? if you have to pick a clutch for your rx-7 which one will you pick for it A #1 solid hub clutch or A # 2 sprung hub clutch
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jase03
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
26
Sep 29, 2015 10:36 AM
stickmantijuana
20B Forum
9
Sep 22, 2015 07:39 PM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.