3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

1,500 miles on my LS1 powered '93 RX7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-02, 03:40 PM
  #26  
Full Member

 
WANKEL POWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
wow. that is awesome. its kinda funny listening to an rx7 that soundslike that , but wow!! awesome, if i had money, i'd go for the conversion
Old 12-04-02, 04:01 PM
  #27  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
That looks nice -- good to see a completed conversion finally. That is a very tempting option for those of us with SMOG or rotary reliability woes.

-Max
Old 12-04-02, 04:04 PM
  #28  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes...very interesting

so..just curious...what is total cost of the conversion...parts...motor...labor....


just wondering...all ballpark figure is fine


jason
Old 12-04-02, 04:07 PM
  #29  
Senior Member

 
Kiflin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Price does not include the engine btw. Its for the kit to put it in easier. The engine is 2800-4000 used, 5000 new.
Old 12-04-02, 04:24 PM
  #30  
Rotary Freak

 
paw140's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You need a tranny too, and all the accessories, etc. I was looking on Ebay, and complete engine/tranny assemblies go for around 3 to 5K, depending on mileage and year.
Old 12-04-02, 04:28 PM
  #31  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so 12k so far right...approx...

what else...how much?

how bout labor....how many hours labor?....a rough estimate.



j
Old 12-04-02, 06:04 PM
  #32  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (1)
 
yzf-r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
crap, by the time Jim gets his lifer project done, this V8-7 stuff is going to be old news
Old 12-04-02, 06:15 PM
  #33  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
ArchangelX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surprisingly, that engine looks QUITE at home in the FD. One question, is the LS1 lighter than the 13B?
Old 12-04-02, 06:23 PM
  #34  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Brentis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
He said within 50lbs when you include the turbos, intercooler and associated parafinalia.
Old 12-04-02, 06:25 PM
  #35  
fart on a friends head!!!

 
rotorbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: sheppard AFB, TX
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by ArchangelX
Surprisingly, that engine looks QUITE at home in the FD. One question, is the LS1 lighter than the 13B?
HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!


i hope that was a joke. . . i wanna know what kind of handling characteristics it has now that the f/r weight ratio is off!!!!!

if its still good then this conversion might be veeeeeeeeeery worthwhile.

paul
Old 12-04-02, 06:30 PM
  #36  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I have a hard time believing that "owners will not notice a difference in handling" when half of the engine is hanging in front of the wheel axis. Despite the neglible weight increase, a portion of that weight is now in front of the wheel axis instead of completely behind it like the 13B.

Also, there is a mandatory bump steer correction for $85. What does this consist of? How is the steering and bump steer compared to a 13B-powered FD? Jimlab went through a lot of time, effort, and $$$ with his conversion to avoid messing with the steering rack.

All that being said, the price of the components seems VERY reasonable for such a customized project.
Old 12-04-02, 06:31 PM
  #37  
Newb Photog

 
wptrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: new jersey
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so why is jimlab's install taking so long?

luigi
Old 12-04-02, 06:50 PM
  #38  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (1)
 
yzf-r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to his credit, Jim is a serious perfectionist....and time is irrelevant to such

well, at least until you are too old to drive

Last edited by yzf-r1; 12-04-02 at 06:56 PM.
Old 12-04-02, 07:34 PM
  #39  
Super Snuggles

 
jimlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 10,091
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally posted by rynberg
I have a hard time believing that "owners will not notice a difference in handling" when half of the engine is hanging in front of the wheel axis.
Half?? Hardly. Don't you people ever get tired of making snap judgements that you obviously have no experience or facts to back up? Take a look...



At least 85% of the bulk of a Chevrolet V8 is behind the rear edge of the motor mount, which you can obviously see is located even farther back in the chassis than the wheel centerline, which corresponds roughly with the lower ball joint. VERY little of the engine's weight hangs in front of the wheel centerline.

You're also forgetting that the swap eliminates all the weight of the intercooler, which is located in front of the wheel centerline. Cut a little more weight here and there (sleek light kit? extra wiring?), and you've actually concentrated your weight farther towards the center of the chassis, as well as lowered the center of gravity somewhat. A V8 carries most of its weight centered around the crankshaft, which is at the very bottom of the block... about 2-3" lower than a rotary engine's eccentric shaft, give or take.

Despite the neglible weight increase, a portion of that weight is now in front of the wheel axis instead of completely behind it like the 13B.
Perhaps, but there are other mitigating factors, as mentioned above. At least reserve judgement until you've seen the results of a 4-corner scale weighing of a converted car.

Also, there is a mandatory bump steer correction for $85. What does this consist of? How is the steering and bump steer compared to a 13B-powered FD? Jimlab went through a lot of time, effort, and $$$ with his conversion to avoid messing with the steering rack.
The LS1 is taller than an LT1, so something has to give. A 20B conversion also requires relocating the steering rack, unless you want to start cutting the firewall...
Old 12-04-02, 07:37 PM
  #40  
Super Snuggles

 
jimlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 10,091
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally posted by wptrx7
so why is jimlab's install taking so long?
Because until recently, I only worked on the car when I felt like it. Which wasn't very often.
Old 12-04-02, 07:41 PM
  #41  
Super Snuggles

 
jimlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 10,091
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally posted by yzf-r1
to his credit, Jim is a serious perfectionist....and time is irrelevant to such

well, at least until you are too old to drive


I'm pushing to have the car done in January or February, with a little luck. I'm going to start throwing money at everything I can control, and start getting shitty with the people who are handling the things I can't.
Old 12-04-02, 07:48 PM
  #42  
Full Member

 
Crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Greenville, OH
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Conv.WS6
As a C5 owner, I must say I love the RX7 and I love the C5, but DAMN the Video is awesome. I'm so doing this conversion with my RX7 when the rotary goes out again... LOL.... Hell does anyone want to trade a dead RX7 for a 15K mile RX7 + cash

How much cash?
Old 12-04-02, 07:51 PM
  #43  
Eye In The Sky

iTrader: (2)
 
cewrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,895
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
Interesting and nice, but you need to change that exhaust system so it does not sound like a truck!

Besides it is too loud.
Old 12-04-02, 08:07 PM
  #44  
Super Snuggles

 
jimlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 10,091
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally posted by cewrx7r1
Besides it is too loud.
Compared to a rotary engine with a full open exhaust??
Old 12-04-02, 08:10 PM
  #45  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by jimlab
At least 85% of the bulk of a Chevrolet V8 is behind the rear edge of the motor mount, which you can obviously see is located even farther back in the chassis than the wheel centerline, which corresponds roughly with the lower ball joint. VERY little of the engine's weight hangs in front of the wheel centerline.

You're also forgetting that the swap eliminates all the weight of the intercooler, which is located in front of the wheel centerline. Cut a little more weight here and there (sleek light kit? extra wiring?), and you've actually concentrated your weight farther towards the center of the chassis, as well as lowered the center of gravity somewhat. A V8 carries most of its weight centered around the crankshaft, which is at the very bottom of the block... about 2-3" lower than a rotary engine's eccentric shaft, give or take.
Upon closer look of the picture (and your picture- thanks), I'll take back some of my statement. The engine does still have some weight in front of the centerline, whether that is equal to the effects of an intercooler or not, I don't know. And Jim, I wasn't just jumping into something I know nothing about, I was just a little taken aback by their statement that the handling would not change. I have a tough time believing that there would be no noticeable change -- perhaps THEY should cornerweight the car.....

Originally posted by jimlab
The LS1 is taller than an LT1, so something has to give. A 20B conversion also requires relocating the steering rack, unless you want to start cutting the firewall...
True, but I wouldn't do a 20B swap either.... I just think the company is glossing over some negatives to their conversion, which no previous poster had mentioned.

I am not a "h8ter", I have nothing against your V-8 swap or others like it (even if I wouldn't consider it at this stage). What I don't like is the swap being presented as "perfect".
Old 12-04-02, 08:16 PM
  #46  
Super Snuggles

 
jimlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 10,091
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally posted by rynberg
I am not a "h8ter", I have nothing against your V-8 swap or others like it (even if I wouldn't consider it at this stage). What I don't like is the swap being presented as "perfect".
I hear ya.
Old 12-04-02, 08:27 PM
  #47  
Old and grumpy

iTrader: (4)
 
cabaynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by rynberg
I am not a "h8ter", I have nothing against your V-8 swap or others like it (even if I wouldn't consider it at this stage). What I don't like is the swap being presented as "perfect".
really this is exactly how i feel about it, after reading Jimlab's thread i was very accepting of the LS1 in the FD, but this thread now is kind of starting to frighten me... i'm afraid that in 3 years when someone comes to this forum and asks a question about the 13B everyone will respond like "well if you were smart and did the LS1 conversion like everyone else... blah blah..." and i dont think that this is really what this board is all about. i guess i'm just afraid of this idea catching on, and i mean really really catching on... with these guys in this thread offering their 13B engine for sale on the spot, it does upset me just a little to see so many people "giving up" on the rotary just because something easier came along... but i guess thats just me... or does anyone else feel this way too? i hope i'm not alone and that the 13B will not soon be a thing of the past in the FD
Old 12-04-02, 08:32 PM
  #48  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
streetraceseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: tampa
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Kiflin
You can run a 10 off a 350 v8??

who cant.... is a better question.
Old 12-04-02, 08:33 PM
  #49  
Super Snuggles

 
jimlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 10,091
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally posted by stokedxiv
i hope i'm not alone and that the 13B will not soon be a thing of the past in the FD
Considering that even if you doubled the number of current finished and "in progress" V8 conversions that you'd only account for about 0.02% of total FD production numbers, I don't think it's something you'll need to lose too much sleep over.

A few V8 threads in the 3rd gen. section is hardly an epidemic. I doubt you'll see any measureable decrease in the number of rotary-related troubleshooting threads any time soon...
Old 12-04-02, 08:33 PM
  #50  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by GsrSol


LS1 isn't a 350

And his car is no longer an RX-7.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.