3rd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 3rd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

Improved OEM manifold designs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-16, 06:20 AM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Zepticon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 920
Received 598 Likes on 335 Posts
Improved OEM manifold designs?

I came to wonder why there are not more options for improved OEM exhaust manifold designs? I mean with the current technology available in 2016, and even more in the future, redesigning and removing the faults of the Mazda manifold should not be to hard?

With the RX7 entering the "classic" era, i think people want to hold on to it as it was from factory, but also improve and fix the faults it came with. A new redesigned manifold with better materials and casting/machining would probably aid a lot in the issues the twins are seeing?

I know most people say "go single" but that is a huge change to the cars spirit and does not reflect the tech advance the twin-turbo system was in early 90s. Turblown have made an incredible piece of tech with their single turbo manifold, why would not something similar for the twins be possible?

Last edited by Zepticon; 07-29-16 at 06:25 AM.
Old 08-01-16, 09:07 PM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
Honestly, as someone who ran twins for years on track, I'm sure you could improve the manifold design, but turbo design has improved faster... in 1992, you needed twins to balance spool/power, but with modern turbos you really don't.... i can honestly say that the Borg Warner 8374 internal wastegate hasn't changed the character of my car really at all, it just makes a little more power, a little less heat, and has a little less weight and a lot less complexity.
Old 08-03-16, 06:29 AM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Zepticon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 920
Received 598 Likes on 335 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
Honestly, as someone who ran twins for years on track, I'm sure you could improve the manifold design, but turbo design has improved faster... in 1992, you needed twins to balance spool/power, but with modern turbos you really don't.... i can honestly say that the Borg Warner 8374 internal wastegate hasn't changed the character of my car really at all, it just makes a little more power, a little less heat, and has a little less weight and a lot less complexity.
I ahve been drooling on the BW setup since it came out. But the only issue i have with it, is that the car looks modified the instant i put one on. And that ruins a big deal of what i like to do with my car hobby.

I mean, putting a Single on the car is not a problem. I store all parts i remove/modify so that i can put the car back to factory condition. But putting a single turbo on makes it stand out as modified instantly
Old 08-03-16, 08:13 AM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
That really depends on the execution. It can/could look remarkably OEM (unless you're knowledgeable about what the actual OEM setup looked like). You could even retain the EGR and air pump if you really wanted to.

That said, if what you're looking to do is be able to put it back to factory condition quickly, no that won't work.

For the OEM manifold, Ive heard of people hand porting it for better flow. It's so tight, that I think if you were to produce a replacement, you'd almost need to do it with 3D/Cad design and a casting or 3D printing (with metal) process. It would be a time consuming, highly technical, expensive proposition unless you're an engineer with access to all the equipment.
Old 08-03-16, 06:10 PM
  #5  
Constant threat

 
bajaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: near Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 4,952
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Yeah...I get what you are saying, Zepticon but realistically, I don't know what would really be IMPROVED all that much by using "modern technology' in regards to the exhaust manifold. Meaning, one can't really change the design so that would leave perhaps FORGING the manifold rather than casting as one possibility but then again...it is much easier to cast the complex shape of the thing than forge it.
Interesting idea though.
Old 08-04-16, 03:09 PM
  #6  
Full Member

iTrader: (5)
 
photoresistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PDX
Posts: 199
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Has anyone swapped out the OEM turbos for more modern ones? I wonder how much performance you could gain if they were similar sizes (because of space restrictions) but were EFR's or something.. and make a custom cast exhaust manifold to mate up. Sounds like a "mini-20B"-type project.. anybody?
Old 10-16-16, 04:12 PM
  #7  
Full Member

iTrader: (6)
 
Carpe_Diem_7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 176
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
For the OEM manifold, Ive heard of people hand porting it for better flow. It's so tight, that I think if you were to produce a replacement, you'd almost need to do it with 3D/Cad design and a casting or 3D printing (with metal) process. It would be a time consuming, highly technical, expensive proposition unless you're an engineer with access to all the equipment.
The OEM manifold is so tight that it is almost unavoidable to eventually crack due to the pressure created there. I think one guy in the forum tried to use external wastegate with impressive results on the dyno.
I also wish that an improved manifold existed for the twins, that would be an interesting project for anyone willing to put the investment in time and money it requires.
Old 10-16-16, 04:24 PM
  #8  
Full Member

iTrader: (7)
 
7-XR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 119
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, here is a link to that thread ^

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generati...-done-1000553/
Old 10-23-16, 07:51 PM
  #9  
Full Member
 
AlienHack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Thessaloniki
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Carpe_Diem_7
The OEM manifold is so tight that it is almost unavoidable to eventually crack due to the pressure created there. I think one guy in the forum tried to use external wastegate with impressive results on the dyno.
I also wish that an improved manifold existed for the twins, that would be an interesting project for anyone willing to put the investment in time and money it requires.

I also keep my twins altgough the rest of the engine bay is modified (big intercooler biger water heat exhanger ,new cabling ,silicone hoses etc. )
I have thought a lot about making a better manifold for the twins but as soon as i took the twins & oem manifold out to study and start designing the new one i found out what the problem is.... there is actually no exhaust manifold in the fd. There is one small manifold that bolts on to the engine and then the rest of the "exhaust manifold" are actually the housings of the turbines themselves. What i mean is that in a normal 1 turbo car there is an exhaust manifold that combines all the gases to one flange that the turbo it self is bolted on . Well in our cars the manifold is actually the turbos themselves.. so you cant just design a new manifold... as that means that you should design turbo housings actually amd thats really crazy to do...



As you see the manifold is intergrated in the turbine housings. Its not seperate as in this example.



Here you see there is an exhaust maniifold with 2 wastegates (its a twin scroll one) and on the end of it the turbo is bolted . They are 2 seperate things, in our twins the manifold is the turbos themselves...

Last edited by AlienHack; 10-23-16 at 07:58 PM.
Old 10-28-16, 02:30 PM
  #10  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
The 99 turbos, SP version of them, and BNR Stage 3s are all improved versions of the stock turbos. As said above, it would not be cost effective to make a better stock replacement manifold and it would yield little gain. Mazda's goal was to eliminate turbo lag and they were limited to the technology available at the time and by cost. Today a well engineered single turbo setup can outspool, outpower, and be more reliable than the twins.
Old 11-02-16, 09:12 PM
  #11  
www.SakeBombGarage.com
RX7Club Vendor

iTrader: (17)
 
SakeBomb Garage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: California
Posts: 2,174
Received 215 Likes on 123 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
The 99 turbos, SP version of them, and BNR Stage 3s are all improved versions of the stock turbos. As said above, it would not be cost effective to make a better stock replacement manifold and it would yield little gain. Mazda's goal was to eliminate turbo lag and they were limited to the technology available at the time and by cost. Today a well engineered single turbo setup can outspool, outpower, and be more reliable than the twins.
__________________
SAKEBOMB GARAGE LLC
www.SAKEBOMBGARAGE.com
Specialty aftermarket parts & service // Fremont, California
Contact: info@sakebombgarage.com




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 AM.