3rd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 3rd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

Anyone tested the PWR U-type SMIC (from Australia)

Old Feb 21, 2024 | 10:45 AM
  #26  
Zepticon's Avatar
Thread Starter
OEM+
Tenured Member: 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 675
From: Norway
Originally Posted by silverTRD
What is it about this kit that makes it so you can’t use the Stock air box and crossover? Is it the duct?
where did you get that info from? I was not aware of the compatability issues.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2024 | 11:17 AM
  #27  
ZE Power MX6's Avatar
Boilermakers!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (170)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 379
From: Chicago, IL
I don't know about the airbox, but 99 Y-pipe definitely fits.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2024 | 03:28 PM
  #28  
silverTRD's Avatar
Time or Money, Pick one
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 169
From: Torrance, ca.
I forget where I read it but someone mentioned it didn’t fit with the stock air box and crossover.
Is Facebook still the only place to get these?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2024 | 07:02 PM
  #29  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by ZE Power MX6
I don't know about the airbox, but 99 Y-pipe definitely fits.
The “efini Y pipe looks to be in the earlier pic. I was thinking he meant the “stock Y pipe and crossover” we got in our S6 NADM’s that used the fail-prone coupler. FWIW I don’t recall any difference in how the efini mated up on my stock IC when I switched. Or how it later mated to my PFS.

Last edited by Sgtblue; Feb 21, 2024 at 07:05 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2024 | 10:24 PM
  #30  
ZE Power MX6's Avatar
Boilermakers!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (170)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 379
From: Chicago, IL
The earlier Y-pipe should sit at the same spot as the later one, technically should be call 96+ Y-pipe. So if one fit the other one should too.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2024 | 04:41 AM
  #31  
SPII's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Sydney - Australia
HI EVERY ONE YES I STILL SELLING THE U TYPE COOLER IM MAKING ON THE TWIN TURBO 550HP AT WHEELS IF ANY ONE WANT THE BEST COOLER ON THE MARKET U CAN MESSAGE ME IN FB MY LINK https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=527820134
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2024 | 02:07 PM
  #32  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
making 550 w that tiny intercooler???

there is no free lunch. w intercoolers it is about cubic inches and just like you hear the piston crowd say there isn't a substitute for cubic inches.

the IC looks nicely fixtured and it is probably an upgrade and O K for those running the OE turbo system. if you are running a single turbo, forget it.

i have significant experience with PWR.

in 2022 i had their subsidiary (C&R Racing, Indianapolis) make me a clone of my Spearco/M2 large/now Pettit IC. i also had Bell make the same. actually i had two ICs made by PWR. one was a tube and fin (highly recommended to me by a C&R guy who was subsequently fired). the other C&R was the bar and plate.

the tube and fin failed for my power output. the bar and plate which was the second C&R atttempt was O K and placed just behind the Bell. neither was as good as my Spearco which i have had since 2005 and was made by George Spears, the father of intercoolers IMO.

all were tested for heat rejection (w a thermocouple) and pressure drop just before and after the core.

charge air coming out of the typical single turbo at 15 psi is normally just over 300 F. at 20 psi 400 is not uncommon. if you are running your tiny undersized OE turbos at over the factory boost setting you will see at least as much temp if not more.

our FDs are handicapped by the small nose area... no place to put a proper sized IC. all of our intercoolers are undersized.

build quality on anything PWR/C&R Racing is first class.

the primary reason for my post is the 550 rwhp comment from this guy. anyone w half a brain would never try to push 73 pounds per minute through such an intercooler. he must think we have lots of dopes on this site.

if you are running the stock turbos and want to go w this setup find another vendor who doesn't think you are stoopid..


Reply
Old Mar 1, 2024 | 05:29 PM
  #33  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by Howard Coleman
making 550 w that tiny intercooler???….
the primary reason for my post is the 550 rwhp comment from this guy. anyone w half a brain would never try to push 73 pounds per minute through such an intercooler. he must think we have lots of dopes on this site.

if you are running the stock turbos and want to go w this setup find another vendor who doesn't think you are stoopid..
Yeah, I raised the bullshit flag earlier on this. Goes with SPII’s (Markus Read) reputation on the Aussie forum and probably related to why he was banned there.

Last edited by Sgtblue; Mar 1, 2024 at 05:33 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2024 | 06:17 AM
  #34  
Zepticon's Avatar
Thread Starter
OEM+
Tenured Member: 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 675
From: Norway
There are no other vendors as this is his design and made to order by PWR. Dont really plan on going very far on this, i just want a nice upgrade for twins (oem or bnr). If singel is an option it will be with a v-mount.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2024 | 01:17 PM
  #35  
Natey's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 1,484
From: West Coast
This thread made me wonder how hard it would be to find someone to "recreate" my Blitz SMIC. They're getting tough to find too.

I made 551HP AT THE WHEELS with mine.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2024 | 01:58 PM
  #36  
billyboy's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 287
From: sydney
4 years is a good effort in the procrastination stakes I must say, hehe.

Probably the main reason for these solutions, is nothing screams an illegal car in these particular parts like a prominent intercooler....although normally you have to be a youngin who fails the attitude test when pulled over after doing something stupid, or stumble on an EPA testing station leaving a hoon event.

Like most things automotive, probably most breakthrough discoveries, were made in the first few decades of the 20th century and intercoolers were already well developed by the 40s....any fathers in that field are long gone I'd suggest.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2024 | 02:06 PM
  #37  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 964
From: Stamford, CT
I have a knightsports if interested
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2024 | 07:14 PM
  #38  
RX7.Pilot's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 11
From: Los Angeles
@ Howard

The HKS V Mount is the largest I have seen rated to 800HP. Ever seen one in person installed? I have a new one in the box but going to buy another threw a friend in Japan for how low the yen is as a backup.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2024 | 01:05 AM
  #39  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 964
From: Stamford, CT
Where does it say the HKS is rated for 800hp? Is that at the engine or wheels, and piston or rotary application?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2024 | 02:06 AM
  #40  
Zepticon's Avatar
Thread Starter
OEM+
Tenured Member: 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 675
From: Norway
Originally Posted by TwinCharged RX7
I have a knightsports if interested
Thanks for the offer, but im pretty set on the aesthetics of the PWR one.
Performance wise they are probably mostly the same.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2024 | 08:43 AM
  #41  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by TwinCharged RX7
Where does it say the HKS is rated for 800hp? Is that at the engine or wheels, and piston or rotary application?
HKS says 500hp, https://www.hks-power.co.jp/en/produ...ler/index.html
so 50 less than that U type...

HKS did have a GT core which would have been for higher hp cars, but not in a V mount kit for an FD
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2024 | 10:01 AM
  #42  
boostin13b's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 404
From: Tampa, Florida
Originally Posted by Zepticon
Thanks for the offer, but im pretty set on the aesthetics of the PWR one.
Performance wise they are probably mostly the same.
I'm in the same boat. I also like that the PWR one will come with a carbon fiber duct which will hopefully go well with my AutoEXE intake.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2024 | 10:25 AM
  #43  
RX7.Pilot's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 11
From: Los Angeles
Your right, on RHD Japan it says up to 700PS but HKS says 500PS. I have never seen a bigger V mount then this with such a really big core and thought from the size it would support 800 crank HP.

Looking at a similar core size from others like Garret, it shows 800HP which means very little lol until temperature log after cooled can prove what any cooler will do HP wise on the specific application.

Last edited by RX7.Pilot; Mar 5, 2024 at 10:46 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2024 | 10:30 AM
  #44  
RX7.Pilot's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 11
From: Los Angeles
Well here is the right way to test this. You need to see the temps coming out after the cooler. The U type is certainly smaller then the HKS and you have the double core so the heat from the first goes threw the second.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2024 | 10:01 PM
  #45  
billyboy's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 287
From: sydney
Usual problem with HKS cores (and the bigger ones here), limited options for air intakes.....and most **** away any advantage sucking discharged hot air from the heat exchangers. You might be able to plumb something with a shorty manifold and a lot of mandrel bends.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2024 | 12:34 PM
  #46  
RX7.Pilot's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 11
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by billyboy
Usual problem with HKS cores (and the bigger ones here), limited options for air intakes.....and most **** away any advantage sucking discharged hot air from the heat exchangers. You might be able to plumb something with a shorty manifold and a lot of mandrel bends.
True that is a problem. I'm going to do the new BNR Stage 2 Sequential and run that very nice HKS RS Suction intake. It's very nice OEM quality and turns away from the core into the fender liner. I'm a while away from installing my HKS R V mount and intake but I think it would be possible to shield the intake and maybe bring cool air to it. One thing that will help is motion. If your moving the hot air will be less of an issue but without temp data. We don't know. One thing I do see is the same size R core do make 800WHP on GTR and Supras. It really is an amazing kit and I just bought another for a backup. It will not be long until HKS will not have the R V mount or the RS intake.

Against with a U core I believe it is worse because of the heating from the front core passing threw the second core.

Last edited by RX7.Pilot; Mar 6, 2024 at 02:40 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2024 | 12:59 PM
  #47  
ninesixtwo's Avatar
No Glory
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 276
Likes: 98
From: Calgary, AB
Originally Posted by billyboy
Usual problem with HKS cores (and the bigger ones here), limited options for air intakes.....and most **** away any advantage sucking discharged hot air from the heat exchangers. You might be able to plumb something with a shorty manifold and a lot of mandrel bends.
This is nowhere near as big an issue as most people think it is, especially at the boost levels most rotary guys are running at.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2024 | 01:52 PM
  #48  
Natey's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 1,484
From: West Coast
Originally Posted by RX7.Pilot

Against with a U core you I believe it is worse because of the heating from the front core passing threw the second core.
My thoughts exactly. A single core that's twice as thick seems like a better idea than two stock cores connected by a pipe, for both flow and heat exchange.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2024 | 01:57 PM
  #49  
rx72c's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 195
From: Australia
If you like 70 degree C air temps this is a great option. Had one in my car. If the car idles for a few minutes it heat soaks extremely quickly. It comes down once you're moving to like 45-50 degrees C but quickly heat soaks.

Better than factory sure... Should you use it? Hell no. Get a proper cooling system and do it properly.

My opinion of course.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2024 | 02:32 PM
  #50  
R-R-Rx7's Avatar
Rotor or no motor
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,746
Likes: 503
From: Limassol, CYPRUS
There’s plenty of other things that are also wrong with the HKS v mount kit.


Last edited by R-R-Rx7; Mar 6, 2024 at 02:40 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 AM.