2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Why shouldnt i convert to turbo.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-06, 07:29 AM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Crzy Crl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why shouldnt i convert to turbo.

Now, dont get mad at me, i know many people have asked questions about converting their non-turbo second gens to trubo, but i still have a question. Why dont people recommend the conversion, is it too hard, too dangerous, too expensive or what? Almost everyone says just stick with non-turbo or buy a turbo II. I really dont want to sell my car, which i have put hours of work into. Its my first car and i really do like it. I would rather not sell it for a car that I may not like as much. So i ask again, why dont people suggest the turbo conversion?
Old 02-23-06, 07:42 AM
  #2  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Because 99% of the people that ask about doing it don't have the knowledge or ability to do it properly. Also, they generally try to do it as cheap as possible using whatever junk they can find laying around, and the result is usually a dead engine.
Old 02-23-06, 07:44 AM
  #3  
Boost in..Apex seals out.

 
adrock3217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Maryland, 21794
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do it correctly, or buy a Turbo 2. As Rat said, most can't do it correctly, so people say..buy a Turbo 2.
Old 02-23-06, 07:50 AM
  #4  
I'm back Bishes

 
rotorforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you decide to do a tII swap the RIGHT way, it's basically like lifting the shell of the car and dropping it onto a tII chassis. Remember not only would you replace the engine, but the Tranny, rear end, suspension, and braking system.

If you plan on spending that kind of money just buy a TII. Besides whats wrong with owning 2 FC's?
Old 02-23-06, 08:27 AM
  #5  
/dev/rx7

iTrader: (1)
 
DR_Toast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why go turbo? Your engine could a-splode!

I just bought a convertible tII swap that looks like it was wired by the three stooges. Its going to take me months to get all this crap hooked up right. On the other hand, I am learning the inner workings of my rx7 at an exponential rate, thats worth something.
Old 02-23-06, 12:00 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

 
Syonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Reasons I can think of for staying NA:

1. Simplicity. A turbo adds a lot of complexity. A NA, with emissions removed, is a *very* simple engine bay. If you don't have A/C, and either depower the steering rack or (better) swap in a manual rack, the engine bay has very little in it, and getting at anything in the engine bay is trivial.
2. Reliability. A properly tuned/maintained turbo FC is reliable, but... there's a lot that aren't. And, even so, the more power you push, the more strain on the engine. A 400WHP TII is *not* going to last as long as a similarly maintained NA.
3. Engine response. A NA motor responds differently to throttle than a turbo. There's no lag, and a given throttle setting at a given RPM will produce the same amount of power. This is why some people build up NAs for 200 WHP - a built NA drives significantly differently from a turbo.

-=Russ=-
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spokanerxdude
Megasquirt Forum
3
10-06-15 12:28 PM
Robrods64
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
10-02-15 07:56 PM



Quick Reply: Why shouldnt i convert to turbo.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.