2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

WHP limit with stock TII fuel rails and lines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-13, 12:00 AM
  #1  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WHP limit with stock TII fuel rails and lines

I was wondering what the limit would be with the stock fuel rails and lines, don't worry, everything else is good for at least 700whp but how far could I take these stock parts? Anyone test the limit or push their stock rails and lines pretty far?
Old 11-22-13, 06:30 AM
  #2  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
You could/should probably ask this in the second gen section
Old 11-22-13, 10:13 AM
  #3  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fendamonky
You could/should probably ask this in the second gen section
Figured more people have pushed bigger numbers in here
Old 11-22-13, 12:49 PM
  #4  
\\TRASHTALK//

 
Zenki FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: south phoenix
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
run a 1/2 inch drill bit thru them and weld on -8 AN or -6 AN bungs.


you shouldnt use the stock lines in the bay...
Old 11-22-13, 01:23 PM
  #5  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zenki FC3S
run a 1/2 inch drill bit thru them and weld on -8 AN or -6 AN bungs. you shouldnt use the stock lines in the bay...
I have upgraded lines in the bay but stock lines from pump to firewall and stock rails
Old 11-23-13, 02:59 PM
  #6  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the exact reason I did not want it in this section
Old 11-23-13, 05:18 PM
  #7  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
i wouldn't push more than about 500whp with a sub 300lph pump on the stock lines/rails.

for 500+ i would run a walbro 400 and the rising RPM rails.
Old 11-23-13, 05:31 PM
  #8  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
i wouldn't push more than about 500whp with a sub 300lph pump on the stock lines/rails. for 500+ i would run a walbro 400 and the rising RPM rails.
I have dual walbro 400's now Ben, and 4x id2000's, and a BW s400sx lol. I was planning on running those rails but am not gonna do it unless I also upgrade all my lines, just trying to decide if I should upgrade it all right now and put off finishing this or if I would be able to get decent power on the stock stuff
Old 11-23-13, 06:27 PM
  #9  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
with that i would probably do a -6 parallel line setup with all new hardlines under the car, they're cheap enough.
Old 11-23-13, 06:54 PM
  #10  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,789
Received 2,569 Likes on 1,828 Posts
Originally Posted by Cosmo_TT
I have dual walbro 400's now Ben, and 4x id2000's, and a BW s400sx lol. I was planning on running those rails but am not gonna do it unless I also upgrade all my lines, just trying to decide if I should upgrade it all right now and put off finishing this or if I would be able to get decent power on the stock stuff
you should hook up the fuel line to like a 5 gallon bucket, and turn the pump on for a 30 seconds, and see how much fuel you actually get.

400liters per hour, divide by 60 to get liters per minute. ~7 liters a minute, or 1.8 gallons.
Old 11-23-13, 06:57 PM
  #11  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then I should have plenty of fuel right lol

I only bought two of those pumps cause I got such a great deal on them, if I can make 600-650 on 1 of them with my KB BAP then I'll just use 1 but if I need both I have them already
Old 11-23-13, 08:48 PM
  #12  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
you should only need 1 for over 600whp on pump gas but i haven't really pushed them up there to really know their limits.
Old 11-23-13, 09:05 PM
  #13  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Easy rule of thumb for fuel line sizing from A. Graham Bell:
1/4" OD (-4 AN) - 165bhp EFI, 110bhp Carb
5/16" OD (-5 AN) - 300bhp EFI, 200bhp Carb
3/8" OD (-6 AN) - 500bhp EFI, 335bhp Carb
1/2" OD (-8 AN) - 1000bhp EFI, 675bhp Carb

Also, the Aeromotive website has a power planner section.
Aeromotive | Power Planner
Old 11-23-13, 10:34 PM
  #14  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Easy rule of thumb for fuel line sizing from A. Graham Bell: 1/4" OD (-4 AN) - 165bhp EFI, 110bhp Carb 5/16" OD (-5 AN) - 300bhp EFI, 200bhp Carb 3/8" OD (-6 AN) - 500bhp EFI, 335bhp Carb 1/2" OD (-8 AN) - 1000bhp EFI, 675bhp Carb Also, the Aeromotive website has a power planner section. Aeromotive | Power Planner
That's some good info right there, about what size is stock lines? What about rails? Is it just that they look better or do rising rpm rails also flow better?
Old 11-23-13, 11:19 PM
  #15  
\\TRASHTALK//

 
Zenki FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: south phoenix
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Stock FC fuel line under the chassis is 5/16 I think. Super tiny and a bottleneck with that pump. Run -6 or 8 for safe hp like 350+
Old 11-23-13, 11:34 PM
  #16  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Cosmo_TT
That's some good info right there, about what size is stock lines? What about rails? Is it just that they look better or do rising rpm rails also flow better?
The stock lines are 5/16". The stock S4 fuel rails are M14x1.5 on one end and M12x1.25 on the other, which can be fitted with a -6 or -8 AN adapter (available from Earl's). The Rising RPM fuel rails have 3/8" NPT fittings, so there is no functional advantage to using them unless you have the crummy stock S5 rails that are not worth modifying.
Old 11-23-13, 11:43 PM
  #17  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
i think those flow rates are a bit broad, since i've already managed several cars right at 500whp with the stock hard lines.

also iirc the RRPM rails accomodate -8 without much of a step down. the stock rails have a smaller bore but i don't have specific numbers on hand, all i do know for certain is they provide enough fuel for over 500whp with no problem.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 11-23-13 at 11:47 PM.
Old 11-24-13, 01:55 AM
  #18  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
i think those flow rates are a bit broad, since i've already managed several cars right at 500whp with the stock hard lines.
They are broad because they are based on a generally-accepted velocity limit, Reynolds number, flow rate, fuel weight, and friction coefficient, and BSFC is not taken into account except for a generalized "forced induction" and "naturally aspirated" rating on the Aeromotive website. The guidance also does not take into account line length and gravity effects. Given that most of the people on this forum do not have a physics background, the basic guidance should be sufficient. Using a fuel line much smaller than recommended results in an undesirable amount of pressure loss and turbulence.
Old 11-25-13, 11:00 AM
  #19  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
and too large and the pump will have a difficult time keeping the pressure up.
Old 11-25-13, 11:39 AM
  #20  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
and too large and the pump will have a difficult time keeping the pressure up.
Yes, the outlet size of the pump is a good indicator of the line size that it was intended to support. The entire system should be matched.
Old 11-25-13, 03:34 PM
  #21  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cosmo_TT
I have dual walbro 400's now Ben, and 4x id2000's, and a BW s400sx lol. I was planning on running those rails but am not gonna do it unless I also upgrade all my lines, just trying to decide if I should upgrade it all right now and put off finishing this or if I would be able to get decent power on the stock stuff
Oh and I just went to check the outlet size (11mm) and realized they are both walbro 450lph not 400
Old 11-26-13, 10:49 PM
  #22  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
GrossPolluter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm curious how many people with high hp redo the lines under the car. It seems like most people just modify the lines in the engine bay
Old 11-26-13, 10:58 PM
  #23  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GrossPolluter
I'm curious how many people with high hp redo the lines under the car. It seems like most people just modify the lines in the engine bay
Well that's what I am talking about and started this thread for, I mean all the lines, from pump to rail, even the fuel pump hanger, does anyone modify the line that goes through the lid? Seems like it's the same size as the hard lines under the car
Old 02-24-14, 02:32 PM
  #24  
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nobody?
Old 02-24-14, 04:03 PM
  #25  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
I don't think that anybody who is making serious power still has the original fuel tank or the lid. What are you going to do with a 500+hp car that doesn't have a fuel cell?


Quick Reply: WHP limit with stock TII fuel rails and lines



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM.