2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

What's wrong with this picture?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 03:28 PM
  #1  
Go48's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 3
From: Mont Alto, PA
What's wrong with this picture?

See the attached simplified image of the exhaust system from the shop manual. [I have added the conversion legend.] The torque recommendations do not make sense to me. The only one that seems correct is the "59-80 N-m (6.0-8.2 m-kg, 43-59 ft-lb). The other specs are supposedly in inch-pounds, but if you do the conversions, they are all incorrect. Especially disturbing is the torque for the bolts/nuts connecting the down pipe to the turbo. According to a conversion of 44-53.9 N-m, the torque in ft-lbs should be 33-40, or the inch-pound equivalent: 12 x 33=396 or 12 x 40=480.

What am I missing? I definetely do no want to over tighten any of those bolts/nuts. Comments appreciated!
Attached Thumbnails What's wrong with this picture?-exhaust-system-small.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #2  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
In/lbs????

No, it is ft lbs.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #3  
Go48's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 3
From: Mont Alto, PA
But if you convert N-m to either in-lb or ft-lb, neither one agrees with the conversion shown in the graphic. Only the one I mentioned (the 3 main flanges) seems to be correct.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #4  
OutCold's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Norway
i dont really think its that big of a deal without being any experienced mechanic, just thighten so the screw aint loose ( abit more of course : )or the paint/metal/texture chips off from too much force...

Last edited by OutCold; Aug 25, 2008 at 11:50 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #5  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Tighten the one in question to 45 ft lbs. Think it is just a typo, but almost all the exhaust 14mm nuts can be torqued to between 45 and 60 ft lbs with no issues.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #6  
Go48's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 3
From: Mont Alto, PA
Originally Posted by Icemark
Tighten the one in question to 45 ft lbs. Think it is just a typo, but almost all the exhaust 14mm nuts can be torqued to between 45 and 60 ft lbs with no issues.
Yeah, that would be more like it for sure. Thanks!
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #7  
Tatakai's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
it's exhaust, your car will not blow up in the event you over/under tightened a bolt or two. tighten it until the two parts make contact and just tighten until you REALLY have to get on the wrench to go any further.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whinin
Introduce yourself
17
Mar 30, 2019 07:53 PM
Murilli
Midwest RX-7 Forum
0
Sep 3, 2015 09:10 AM
ray green
1st Gen General Discussion
2
Sep 2, 2015 06:35 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.