2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

whats a good fuel setup for 12bls of boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #26  
phoenix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
damn you S4 guys and your Rtek!! are they making the S5 version yet?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 11:55 PM
  #27  
TweakGames's Avatar
FD pro licensed driver
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,897
Likes: 2
From: Renton/Bellevue/Seattle WA
*test 2 C If The Forums R Broken*
*update yes yes it is broken* haha
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #28  
dwb87's Avatar
This is my social media.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
From: WA
I am running RTek v1.8 (720cc primaries and secondaries) with a Walbro 255LPH fuel pump... plus an intake, Racing Beat REV-TII exhaust system, street port, and BNR Stage 4 turbo (should be back soon). My goal is 300RWHP. I will probably need some other things to reach that goal if I don't make it with these mods. Good luck with your set-up though. You really should consider RTek if you're not going to mess with an EMS. Especially since you're running 4x 720cc injectors without a controller or anything.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 06:38 AM
  #29  
gear_grinder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Don't hate my V8
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Cornfield, Indiana
yeah i'm preaty sure i'm going to go w/ the rtec (1.8), it sounds good and looks like a great deal, and i have heard lots of good things just surfin the fourms.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 01:06 PM
  #30  
phoenix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
you should be way above 300 with the BNR stage 4. Their stage 1 dynoed 294rwhp so I don't see how you can't make that at lower boost with the Stage 4.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:23 PM
  #31  
Donn Hecht's Avatar
1 BAD 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Miami,Fla
Let me go ahead and clarify what should be done here with this fuel setup.
I ran the following setup on a 88" Street Ported Turbo-II with the following.
Let me state that the exhaust was ported, and not the intake.
Stock 550 in the primaries, with Greedy 720’s in the Secondary.
While you are upgrading your Secondary injectors it would be wise to get your stock 550's cleaned and balanced professionally at a shop. Once you get your 550's back cleaned install them along with the 720's. It would be a great idea while you are at it to install a fresh fuel filter "Mazda Preferred " This alone assures you peace of mind as far as your injectors flowing perfectly as they should be, and your fuel is clean and the fuel filter is not clogged "Which can cause a lean condition". As far as a fuel pump is concerned I ran my stock Turbo-II pump, but I would rewire the pump to make sure it is getting the proper voltage. A lot of guys are running Walboro, FD, or Cosmo Fuel pumps, even Supra TT pumps with good success. I just bought a S5 Turbo-II with a 300ZX TT pump and it works just fine. Now to control the fuel with the 720's a fuel computer is definitely needed, or else you will be running pig rich, and at most you will only be drowning your car with excess fuel to prevent a "lean" condition from occurring, which means in plain English you will suffer from poor MPG. You will simply be drowning out any potential detonation which is a crude way to tune. An Apexi S-AFC is good as well as an Rtek. I myself consider these fuel controllers more as an "band aid" than anything, however there are a lot of guys here that will disagree with me, but there entitled to there own opinion. I just think it’s a waste of money, because eventually your going to want more power and those fuel controllers are already reaching there limit at this point as far as reliability and efficiency is concerned especially on an AFM, but then again this is my own personal opinion on the matter. An aftermarket EMS especially on a Rotary is the way to go brotha man! As far as an FPR is concerned you don’t really need it stock is just fine, but if you want to install one that would be good. That’s everything as far is fuel is concerned. You will need a FCD as well if you don’t go with the Rtek. A FMIC would be nice as well to keep those hot intakes temps under control. You don’t want to boost more than 12 PSI on the stock turbo as the stock turbo already is reaching its maximum efficiency, you don’t make more power running more than 12 psi, and you’re putting a strain on the oil seals as well. I think that’s pretty much about it. If you do a search under my name I have covered this question a few times already. Good luck.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #32  
phoenix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
^^great post. Good call on re-wiring the fuel pump too.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #33  
Donn Hecht's Avatar
1 BAD 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Miami,Fla
Originally Posted by phoenix7
^^great post. Good call on re-wiring the fuel pump
too.


Thanks Phoenix, I just wanted to help him out and shed some light.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #34  
gear_grinder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Don't hate my V8
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Cornfield, Indiana
how much boost are you guys running to make 300hp?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:48 PM
  #35  
Hex7E's Avatar
I am segfault
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by Donn Hecht
... those fuel controllers are already reaching there limit at this point as far as reliability and efficiency is concerned especially on an AFM...
The rtek 2.1 from what i have herd will allow you to remove your afm, but it is not out yet.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 05:50 PM
  #36  
phoenix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by gear_grinder
how much boost are you guys running to make 300hp?
not with a stock turbo. I have heard rumors of some guy making close to 290 on stock turbo but I've never seen the dyno sheets for it.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #37  
Donn Hecht's Avatar
1 BAD 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Miami,Fla
Originally Posted by Hex7E
The rtek 2.1 from what i have herd will allow you to remove your afm, but it is not out yet.

Oh really? I have read a little bit about the different Rtek versions. The guy that invented it I got to give it to him, it's definitely an improvement from back in the days of just relying on a FCD. I still rather run an EMS though like I said that’s just me. I have been messing around with these cars for eight years now, and through trial and error and of course blowing up motors you live and learn.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 11:33 PM
  #38  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 23
From: n
Originally Posted by gear_grinder
how much boost are you guys running to make 300hp?
More boost does not necessarily mean more power...


-Ted
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #39  
gear_grinder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Don't hate my V8
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Cornfield, Indiana
i guess i dont completly understand a turbo yet, how does a bigger turbo make more power if its running the same psi as a smaller turbo? and i also was concerd w/ getting my intake heat soaked, is there any good way to run a CAI?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 10:17 AM
  #40  
dosracin's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
Originally Posted by gear_grinder
i guess i dont completly understand a turbo yet, how does a bigger turbo make more power if its running the same psi as a smaller turbo? and i also was concerd w/ getting my intake heat soaked, is there any good way to run a CAI?
correct me if Im wrong, but as far as I know is because of the CFM's

CFM=cubic feet per minute

so with that said a smaller turbo will flow less CFM's of air at 12lbs than a larger one at the same boost level, more air= more power. but I could be wrong so let the gurus confirm
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #41  
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor, MI
well, a front-mount intercooler (FMIC) will help prevent heat-soak a hell of a lot more than a CAI. A larger turbo (to a point) will produce more power for a given PSI because of flow rate thru both sides of it (and through the rest of the intake system). Power is a function of how much air you can pump thru the engine, which is a combination of pressure and flow rate.

For example, a small turbine (the exhaust side, aka the hot side) will spin up quickly on lower flow rates and pressures from the exhaust because its more easily "filled" and has got less mass, but once the flow rates and pressures rise higher, it becomes more of a restriction. This is why people 'clip' their turbines, so that a part of the blades is out of the way of the exhaust gas flowing thru, reducing backpressure (but also efficiency). A larger turbine will flow more air thru, more efficiently, with less backpressure, and can keep a consistant pressure number thruout a greater rpm band

this is in no way comprehensive, or even completely technically correct, but it should help you visualize it
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #42  
X-JaVeN-X's Avatar
Drive.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 1
From: Washington, North Carolina
Alright...

Parts list for running 12lbs on stock turbo.

-bigger fuel pump (walbro 255lph), and rewire it
-550/720 (minimum) injector setup
-boost controller (you will likely need this after porting your wastegate to get the 12lbs you want)
-fuel controller (I run the rtek 2.0 and love it)
*BTW the 2.1 will NOT eliminate the AFM, but that will be in a future update supposedly
*If you go with an S-AFC for a controller you will also need an FCD (which is built into the rtek 2.0)


Another thing, expect boost creep after the 3" exhaust. So get it, some don't. I personally (with an RB turbo back exhaust) on an s5 turbo hit 12lbs immediately and would creep to 13-14 (NOT GOOD). Soooo....port the crap out of your wastegate and use a boost controller to get the boost level you want.

I'd recommend a wideband controller of some sort, but not really necessary. Also, get a good boost gauge if you don't have one already....that's a must have.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #43  
Donn Hecht's Avatar
1 BAD 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Miami,Fla
Originally Posted by X-JaVeN-X
Alright...

Parts list for running 12lbs on stock turbo.

-bigger fuel pump (walbro 255lph), and rewire it
-550/720 (minimum) injector setup
-boost controller (you will likely need this after porting your wastegate to get the 12lbs you want)
-fuel controller (I run the rtek 2.0 and love it)
*BTW the 2.1 will NOT eliminate the AFM, but that will be in a future update supposedly
*If you go with an S-AFC for a controller you will also need an FCD (which is built into the rtek 2.0)


Another thing, expect boost creep after the 3" exhaust. So get it, some don't. I personally (with an RB turbo back exhaust) on an s5 turbo hit 12lbs immediately and would creep to 13-14 (NOT GOOD). Soooo....port the crap out of your wastegate and use a boost controller to get the boost level you want.

I'd recommend a wideband controller of some sort, but not really necessary. Also, get a good boost gauge if you don't have one already....that's a must have.




What’s up buddy? I’m curious to know how much you paid for your Innovate LC-1 Wideband Controller with XD-1 Gauge. Also where do you recommend that I can buy a Koyo radiator at a good price? Also your Greddy water temp gauge how do you have it installed in your car? Did you have to tap and drill a fitting in order to install it? I have read before I don’t know where though, that there is a correct way to install the gauge and the sender unit in order to get an accurate reading.
Please let me know where I can get an LC-1 Wideband at a good price as well.
Any websites or info will be useful. Thank you
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #44  
phoenix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
i might be oversimplifying but 12 pounds per square inch is not the same if you have 10" than if you had 20", RIGHT? Same pressure, different volume?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #45  
dosracin's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
Originally Posted by phoenix7
i might be oversimplifying but 12 pounds per square inch is not the same if you have 10" than if you had 20", RIGHT? Same pressure, different volume?
in other words /\ very correct
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #46  
X-JaVeN-X's Avatar
Drive.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 1
From: Washington, North Carolina
Originally Posted by Donn Hecht
What’s up buddy? I’m curious to know how much you paid for your Innovate LC-1 Wideband Controller with XD-1 Gauge. Also where do you recommend that I can buy a Koyo radiator at a good price? Also your Greddy water temp gauge how do you have it installed in your car? Did you have to tap and drill a fitting in order to install it? I have read before I don’t know where though, that there is a correct way to install the gauge and the sender unit in order to get an accurate reading.
Please let me know where I can get an LC-1 Wideband at a good price as well.
Any websites or info will be useful. Thank you
I got my innvate lc-1/xd-1 combo from a groupbuy a good while back here on the foum for right@ $350 shipped I believe. i've seen them on ebay for about $400 shipped. My koyo I also got on ebay. There was a guy selling them for like $265 + $40 for shipping but he had the "or best offer" option and I offered him like $235 (or something like that...and he accepted) so I got a really good deal on it. He's probably still on ebay...just check up there and make an offer.

On the water temp gauge...the best 2 places I've heard from all my research is either in the stock gauge location which requires having it rethreaded to fit the new aftermarket sender or drilling and tapping the water pump housing for the sender.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #47  
NJGreenBudd's Avatar
rx-for-my-7
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 15
From: New Jersey
read the FAQ's, search and read the archives, everything here has been covered before, a number of times.

i'm sorry but personally threads like this all read the same to me....
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 04:04 PM
  #48  
phoenix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
^then why did you bother to chime in?
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2007 | 08:24 AM
  #49  
NJGreenBudd's Avatar
rx-for-my-7
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 15
From: New Jersey
sometimes I can't help myself.

you know, it's like I'm reading the posts and I wanna say something too...

Don't get me wrong I'm interested in a/f ratios and wideband monitors( i want the NGK A/Fx personally) and all that, I just enjoy reading threads that have definitive answers, concise questions that evoke condensed, agreeable information I can take with me.

This thread is just very similar to a number of other threads, though i guess it's hard to avoid repeating things on here. I just find that if I'm grossly ignorant in one particular area ,I'll often read up as much as I can on the FAQ's and other posts, like try to get a basic understanding and narrow down my questions to specifics.

I'd be more to prone to asking for someone’s help in identifying a specific injector make, where to find new injector connectors or how to rewire my fuel new 255lph fuel pump. Even then, I could probably, and have already, found that kind of stuff by searching previous threads.

Maybe it’s just me, I know it’s only my opinion.

I’m running an Rtek7 Stage 2.0 ECU w/ (4) Venom 720cc injectors(w/ new connectors), a 255lph rewired fuel pump and new rubber fuel lines, currently a stock fpr. But my Rtek7 allows me to control those injectors unlike the OP. I don’t know howmuch boost I’m creating but I’ve been babying it under 3500rpms, when I drive it at all, till I get the A/Fx installed, get my turbo rebuilt and the FMIC. I have a brand new motor and don’t want to even chance it…

And I wanted to keep my car reliable, I wouldn’t be pushing 12lbs of boost with a stock(old) turbo and no fuel controller on a 20yr old motor….but again maybe that’s just me..

I didn’t mean to offend the OP, or you Phoenix.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Aug 11, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.