2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

At what point do I need to worry about advancing ignition?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #26  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by slvr7
Base ignition timing has the leading plug firing 5 (measly) degrees before TDC. As rpm builds, timing advances significantly so the the leading plug is firing well _before_ TDC. The resulting flame front takes time (milliseconds) to propogate enough to make the big 'push' on the rotor - with the rotation of the rotor also occurring during those milleseconds, it should all happily occur at or just after TDC.
You can see the problem if you over-advance, or have a fast burning (low octane) mixture - and the push happens before TDC
the problem is on the stock ecu is that you can only move the whole curve, instead of parts of it. so if you set the timing for w.o.t. it might be over or under advanced at part throttle, or idle.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #27  
ajsuper7's Avatar
Nothin But a G Thang
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
i believe the mdrace chip that was developed a long time ago advanced the timing a signifigant amout through the low and mid range and dropped off at high rpms for the best spread of power. supposedly it made a huge difference in mid range power...well as big as you can get with a ecu chip on a n/a. i do not believe that these chips are made anymore or were sold to superchips or some generic ecu company but i dont know if im making stuff up or if thats how it was. im sure some ecu experts can correct me if im wrong. im not sure if there is any way besides a standalone to achieve what i think mdrace did but i have no experience with these matters. anyone want to comment on this?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #28  
Tofuball's Avatar
Jesus is the Messiah
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
Originally posted by RETed
Um, I'm a bit confused on your question...
Did I mentioned anything about doing this?


-Ted
When you said "If you move the CAS, this means ALL ignition timing will be moved this amount."

I thought "ALL" ment the trailing and leading together, as in, you would want to advance them seperately (Whitch confused the heck out of me, thus I asked for more info)

But now that I re-read it, I realise that you ment under different (load, throttle, whatever) situations :-p

Last edited by Tofuball; Jun 17, 2004 at 10:40 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 10:56 AM
  #29  
slvr7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Toronto ON
Dohhh- I meant to say initial timing is 5 degrees AFTER TDC........sorry if any confusion.......


Originally posted by slvr7
Base ignition timing has the leading plug firing 5 (measly) degrees before TDC. As rpm builds, timing advances significantly so the the leading plug is firing well _before_ TDC. The resulting flame front takes time (milliseconds) to propogate enough to make the big 'push' on the rotor - with the rotation of the rotor also occurring during those milleseconds, it should all happily occur at or just after TDC.
You can see the problem if you over-advance, or have a fast burning (low octane) mixture - and the push happens before TDC
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
1
Sep 7, 2015 03:44 PM
acha3
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 6, 2015 08:14 AM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 5, 2015 08:57 PM
SakeBomb Garage
SakeBomb Garage
0
Sep 4, 2015 05:20 PM
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
0
Sep 4, 2015 05:19 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.