2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

what was the fc supposed to come with but didnt make the cut?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #26  
KeloidJonesJr.'s Avatar
strictly business
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,187
Likes: 0
From: chamber of farts
Originally Posted by Icemark
The 10thAE was originally planned to have a 20B (there were actually two built, they were painted winning silver and have non turbo alum hoods) as well the GTUs (not the GTU).

Other than that 13B's throughout.
PICS!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 09:01 PM
  #27  
DeadManWalking's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, Vancouver, Canada
Originally Posted by dopefishlives
uRizen! Dopefish checking in from GenMay.

I want to see pics of the GTUs 3-rotors and digi logicon. I guess that explains why the 20B has such similar mounts to the FC 13B's.

That is a sad loss, sorry your Bullitt bit the dust, most likely the GoodYears were to blame. I really like those, and I spent many months searching for a DHG before running across my FD. I think I probably have more Bullitt memorabilia<SP?> than most actual Bullitt owners. I'll get one some day...

However, as for comparing a 01' Bullitt to a 88' RX-7, not really fair, look to a 5.0 Mustang of the day, which was none-too-impressive. Much love for both rotaries and pistons from me though.
Not Goodyears, but Falken FK451's.

My comparo with the Stang is only based on a claim that if driven properly, the 7 has plenty. The original poster's car is an S4 NA. Knowing this, I responded accordingly and made the comparo with a torque-rich car. I'm not comparing car-to-car, buth rather, the lack of torque in one car and the gobs of torque in another, regardless of year.

BTW: I have replica Bullitt plates I'm selling if you're interested. PM me if so.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #28  
dopefishlives's Avatar
Grand Poobah of Torque
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Clermont, Florida
JJZ 109's? I may be interested in one.. send me a PM with a pic and price to 34787.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #29  
AUGieDogie's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 4
From: seattle
Im wondering if the 20b powered GTUs would have been listed as a "gas guzzler" I know that the Turbo Verts where just barely unable to make the cut and would have suffered a extra tariff sooooooooooo just N/As verts

God think of the things you could do with the 20b options............
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 12:49 AM
  #30  
DREYKO's Avatar
Thread Starter
I "lost" my emissions....
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 6
From: lillington, nc
is that all we have? im resurrecting this because i know theres more out there. and how bout those digital guages scans uRIZen?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 07:10 AM
  #31  
My5ABaby's Avatar
Rotaries confuse me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 3
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Originally Posted by Icemark
Mustangs were not even considered in the same ball park, but rather crude little junker cars that office workers or rednecks too dumb to know better drove back in the day
Or, if you live where I do, that they still drive and don't know better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Monsterbox
Single Turbo RX-7's
22
Jul 29, 2022 10:48 PM
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
Nov 15, 2017 08:44 AM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
Apr 23, 2016 06:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 PM.