2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

What current technology not on 2nd gen RX7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #51  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
That's the funniest BS I've read all week...
haha, naw, your reply topped it. its funny how much praise our cars receive for their handling. perhaps a bit too much??
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 02:20 AM
  #52  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
I had always thought of BMWs as having the best handling...Or is that just an urban myth.

Or maybe not best handling, but a different type. Very rock solid and firm. Never driven BMWs except for a 7-series (not exactly performance material...) Any BMW drivers here with input?

Last edited by gingenhagen; Dec 19, 2004 at 02:25 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 02:54 AM
  #53  
BraveBlueMice's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by gingenhagen
I had always thought of BMWs as having the best handling...Or is that just an urban myth.

Or maybe not best handling, but a different type. Very rock solid and firm. Never driven BMWs except for a 7-series (not exactly performance material...) Any BMW drivers here with input?
Comparing an 86 GXL with an 89 325i, I find that the BMW was quieter in the body roll and wanted to spring out of corners faster. It was not as graceful as my GXL.

It had a lot more torque, and that made a difference in the low speed romping, but it's road hugging ability ended just above seventy. When you got to ninety-100mph, it didn't "hug" anymore, but was still responsive.

My GXL is glued to the roads at all operational speeds (I've done 1-134 in conditions that warranted steering control ie: not straight lines.)

It's a personal preference thing like I said earlier in the thread. I drive my GXL better than I drive my buddy's 325i. They're both fantastic machines, but I feel my GXL is better, because it responds the way I 'feel' it should.

By the numbers, I think that Jay and I are on a level playing field (325 v. GXL)

~Brave Blue Mice
86 GXL - Home Depot Speed Shop
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 02:55 AM
  #54  
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
I
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 12
From: Spanaway, WA
i think our cars can out handle most cars of today, including alot of sports cars,

maybe they dont seem like they are as good as new cars simply because the parts on our cars have 15 odd years of wear and tear on them, so most of us dont ever get to see how well they handled when they were new.

i drove a 1st gen with 90 K and one with 190K and boy was there a difference handling wise, the highmilage was all over the place...
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 03:32 AM
  #55  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
But then again, because they're older cars, parts can be replaced, so the money we spend on the car overall might me be the same as a new car, but much much nicer parts. If I poured 25,000 into my rx-7...
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 06:38 AM
  #56  
RXSevenSymphonies's Avatar
Turbo Swamp Thing
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: 195 Miles West of Bridgeport, WA
Originally Posted by gbowers

My 1988 RX7 has following specs:

Lat. Acc. 86 g
Slalom 67 mph
Braking 0 to 60: 120 feet.

Not many performance or sport cars can better these specs for under $30K and still have balanced handling, smooth acceleration and good looks.
Hey those are the same specs as the Neon SRT-4 and Saturn Ion Redline, thats cute, and all for $21,000, luckily specs don't mean much


Neon/Ion
2920/2960lb
0-60 5.9/6.2sec
1/4 14.5/14.8sec
Skidpad .85/.85g moderate understeer
Slalom 67.3/67.6mph moderate understeer
60-0 118/117ft

Of course differs a bit in weight distribution though 63/37 and 60/40, and that whole front wheel drive dilemma... and being ugly as hell

Last edited by RXSevenSymphonies; Dec 19, 2004 at 06:44 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 07:55 AM
  #57  
Cool_ManX's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
VTEC :p
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 08:51 AM
  #58  
bingoboy's Avatar
Lava Surfer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
From: Kailua, HI
Originally Posted by Cool_ManX
VTEC :p

the N/A 5/6 ports come pretty close to accomplishing what vtec does for a honduh.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 10:54 AM
  #59  
Dan H's Avatar
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Originally Posted by gingenhagen
I had always thought of BMWs as having the best handling...Or is that just an urban myth.

Or maybe not best handling, but a different type. Very rock solid and firm. Never driven BMWs except for a 7-series (not exactly performance material...) Any BMW drivers here with input?
Comparing to my daily beater '87 325e, any of my FC's handled better and had higher limits. I don't think BMW's have best handling. Just a good balance of handling, power, quality, and luxury which is what makes them popular. Although an E30 M3 would probably be pretty fun to drive.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #60  
inflatablepets's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: St Louis
meh,

Last edited by inflatablepets; Dec 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azevedo
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
26
Mar 1, 2019 09:19 PM
wallyrx7
Rotary Car Performance
2
Aug 20, 2015 05:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 AM.