Id like to what 2nd gen come's with the same suspesion that the turbo 2 has.I would like to know differential ratio's to...Sorry if this thread has been done befor.thank's

 

Answers in the FAQ

 

answer is they all suck so why does it matter? if its stock its worn the **** out so get some **** that works

 

did derek have a bad day?

 

That did not help me at all,What make's them a piece of ****.

 

he means that by this age of the car, they will most likely need refreshing anyways. stick with s5 gtu or gxl

 

I know im just being funny.Is the vert diff the same as the turbo 2?Or which gear rito is the same as the turbo 2.''Im not sher.

 

I can say that not everyone has had a sour experience with stock struts like yourself seemed to have had. lol. I know both of my FC's were just fine and performed well for what they were. Stock for stock they are superior to many other cars out of the box. Past and Present sports cars to a degree.

 

Standard features by year/model: https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/specifications-what-did-2nd-generation-rx-7-come-w-options-standard-features-642372/

Turbos have 4.1 rear ends, along with most manual NAs, but the bolt patterns are different as well as LSD vs. Open configuration.

 

The springs or struts or stabilizer bars changed between the Turbo and non turbo models depending on year and model.

For example all the non turbo GXL models had remote adjustable struts standard, while the turbos did not in the USA. And the Convertibles used the same springs as a Turbo in 88, but that changed in 89-91 when the turbos used the same suspension as all the coupes regardless of if they were turbo or not.

But as far as the geometry... yes the basic geometry is the same regardless of model.

 

Just to let everybody know the car is a 87 with sunroof no power window's cloth interior...

 

yea i have had a few fc's that had very good stock suspension on it . but that stuff is still lame and soft too too too much body roll