Vacuum and gas milage
true my instructor at auto trade school said the same thing but with out an acurate vacume gauge inside the **** pit it's impossible, even then very difficult since you have to watch the gauge all the time. it's not worth worrying about (could get more tech. but that's to long right now)
Well, in the airplanes they have a manifold pressure gauge. When you cruise in a N/A aircraft you can set the engine to say 24" of HG. You adjust this by opening or closing the throttle. Don't see why you cant do the same in the car with a boost/vac gauge.
But what is the mystery numbeR?
But what is the mystery numbeR?
Trending Topics
I'm sure everyone has seen the computers in cars that tell you your MPG?
Like in Jeep Cherokees, etc.
Also, BMW's and some other European cars have an analog gauge that shows economy- From high to low.
These gauges don't measure fuel flow, they measure manifold vacuum.
The higher the vacuum, the higher the MPG- BUT this it isn't a function of efficiency. Effeciency factors in work applied- and the highest MPG is simply the least throttle that can be applied to maintain a steady speed.
If less vacuum is present, than the thotlle butterflies are open more, therefore more air going through the engine, therefore the MAF signals the ECU to put more fuel in. (or on a carb, venturi effect draws more fuel)
So- more vacuum = better MPG, because of closed thottle plates.
Like in Jeep Cherokees, etc.
Also, BMW's and some other European cars have an analog gauge that shows economy- From high to low.
These gauges don't measure fuel flow, they measure manifold vacuum.
The higher the vacuum, the higher the MPG- BUT this it isn't a function of efficiency. Effeciency factors in work applied- and the highest MPG is simply the least throttle that can be applied to maintain a steady speed.
If less vacuum is present, than the thotlle butterflies are open more, therefore more air going through the engine, therefore the MAF signals the ECU to put more fuel in. (or on a carb, venturi effect draws more fuel)
So- more vacuum = better MPG, because of closed thottle plates.
Originally posted by tmak26b
uh huh, interesting. So technially teh slower i rev, the better mpg i get, no exception?
uh huh, interesting. So technially teh slower i rev, the better mpg i get, no exception?
Originally posted by NZConvertible
whichever gear puts engine speed closest to peak torque is the most fuel efficient gear to be in.
whichever gear puts engine speed closest to peak torque is the most fuel efficient gear to be in.
This is MAX power- where the engine is acheiving maximum volumetric effeciency....
The ratio betwen fuel used and power produced is the highest.
This isn't max fuel economy.
The ratio betwen fuel used and power produced is the highest.
This isn't max fuel economy.
No. Peak torque is a result of the engine running at its most efficient speed. At that point you're getting the most power/litre of fuel consumed.
This discussion started out without reference to road speed, but now that it's come in, road speed plays a huge part in the equation, because the amount of power required rises to the third power as road speed rises. So 70mph requires 60% more power than 60mph. Have a read of this, it'll explain it better:
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question477.htm
This discussion started out without reference to road speed, but now that it's come in, road speed plays a huge part in the equation, because the amount of power required rises to the third power as road speed rises. So 70mph requires 60% more power than 60mph. Have a read of this, it'll explain it better:
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question477.htm
Originally posted by Eric89GTU
Is that always true? I find that hard to believe... is there an explanation for that somewhere? 'Cause if my peak torque (theorectically) came at 7000 rpm, that would just burn a -ton- of fuel, wouldn't it?
Is that always true? I find that hard to believe... is there an explanation for that somewhere? 'Cause if my peak torque (theorectically) came at 7000 rpm, that would just burn a -ton- of fuel, wouldn't it?
If you're talking strictly about fuel consumption, then yes, higher the vacuum, better the fuel economy.  This is how all those "fuel mileage" gauges tell if you're in "economy" or in "power" mode.  This means take it to really high revs and lift off the throttle - this is when you'll see the highest vacuum, and because the fuel injectors shut off when you lift off the throttle, you get infinite gas mileage cause the car is still rolling.  Anyone with a late-model vehicle with those trip mileage digital read-outs can confirm this.
If you're talking about how to get the best mileage from your FC driving around, they key is to NOT engage the secondary fuel injectors and keep the ECU in closed-loop with just the primary fuel injectors.  For a Turbo II, we're talking about 75mph right under 4,000RPM.  I think it's a little faster for the NA...
-Ted
If you're talking about how to get the best mileage from your FC driving around, they key is to NOT engage the secondary fuel injectors and keep the ECU in closed-loop with just the primary fuel injectors.  For a Turbo II, we're talking about 75mph right under 4,000RPM.  I think it's a little faster for the NA...
-Ted





