Turbo II vs N/a
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lino Lakes MN
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo II vs N/a
I have to do something soon that I really dont want to but its for the best...urgh sell my Rex, it will be hard but it must be done...I figure its not worth keeping at this point because I have to invest too much into a paintjob or a nice new engine....my question...is it worth it just to sell mine and buy a Turbo II or will i just get a slew of new problems?
Whats are the Pros and Cons of a Turbo II?
What are the pro and Cons of having an N/A?
(My cons are I need a paint job...I dont NEED a rebuild...thats probably a year or so down the road)
The paint on my car is faded and the has chips in it, I bought it from a guy who lived in Utah with, where the hot desert sun did a nice job of fading the paint.....
Any advice or opinions? Help me!
Whats are the Pros and Cons of a Turbo II?
What are the pro and Cons of having an N/A?
(My cons are I need a paint job...I dont NEED a rebuild...thats probably a year or so down the road)
The paint on my car is faded and the has chips in it, I bought it from a guy who lived in Utah with, where the hot desert sun did a nice job of fading the paint.....
Any advice or opinions? Help me!
#2
I wish I had a posse...
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio-Boycott Central
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pros of the TII - They're fast, and can go ridiculously faster with minimal mods.
Cons of the TII - Their engines like to spontaneously explode around 100-140K.
Cons of the TII - Their engines like to spontaneously explode around 100-140K.
#3
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
It depends. If you can't afford the non-turbo, then you certainly won't be able to afford the TII which has a slightly higher initial cost and operating cost. A TII is normally going to cost about $500-1000 more than a similar non-turbo, so if you sell yours, the TII you buy with the money will also have some issues that need to be fixed, and you will be back in the same boat. However, if you just don't want to fix up your non-turbo because you would rather have a TII, then that is understandable.
In my experience, both cars will last just as long as each other, the gas mileage at cruise is a negligible 1 mpg difference, and the insurance is the same. The engine rebuilding cost is the same at around $2,000 each, but the TII also has a turbo which needs rebuilding at a cost of around $500. A good used TII transmission is about $450, while a good used non-turbo transmission is about $150, but the other components are similarly priced. There are many more go-fast modifications available for the TII because of the turbo, so it is more expensive to hotrod.
In my opinion, the TII doesn't handle all that well compared to the lighter non-turbo, and the boost is going to make the engine feel mushy compared to the non-turbo, but it is certainly faster in a straight line. When I decided to sell off one of my cars, the TII is the one that went because it just wasn't as fun as the others. Everybody has their own opinions, though.
In my experience, both cars will last just as long as each other, the gas mileage at cruise is a negligible 1 mpg difference, and the insurance is the same. The engine rebuilding cost is the same at around $2,000 each, but the TII also has a turbo which needs rebuilding at a cost of around $500. A good used TII transmission is about $450, while a good used non-turbo transmission is about $150, but the other components are similarly priced. There are many more go-fast modifications available for the TII because of the turbo, so it is more expensive to hotrod.
In my opinion, the TII doesn't handle all that well compared to the lighter non-turbo, and the boost is going to make the engine feel mushy compared to the non-turbo, but it is certainly faster in a straight line. When I decided to sell off one of my cars, the TII is the one that went because it just wasn't as fun as the others. Everybody has their own opinions, though.
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lino Lakes MN
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see thanks for your help, I never knew they felt different of mushy compaired to the N/A, I have no problem with how fast my NA is, I would like to own a Turbo car, I go crazy thinking these things....if i buy one Ill just find a better deal on one thats lower miles/ nicer body....dont it always go that way though?
#5
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Originally posted by Raptorchef
I see thanks for your help, I never knew they felt different of mushy compaired to the N/A, I have no problem with how fast my NA is, I would like to own a Turbo car, I go crazy thinking these things....if i buy one Ill just find a better deal on one thats lower miles/ nicer body....dont it always go that way though?
I see thanks for your help, I never knew they felt different of mushy compaired to the N/A, I have no problem with how fast my NA is, I would like to own a Turbo car, I go crazy thinking these things....if i buy one Ill just find a better deal on one thats lower miles/ nicer body....dont it always go that way though?
BTW, the 89-92 cars have an especially dull suspension feel (for an RX-7), but once again, some people could care less.
#6
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my opinion, the TII doesn't handle all that well compared to the lighter non-turbo, and the boost is going to make the engine feel mushy compared to the non-turbo, but it is certainly faster in a straight line. When I decided to sell off one of my cars, the TII is the one that went because it just wasn't as fun as the others. Everybody has their own opinions, though.
Trending Topics
#8
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bethlehem, PA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how come everyone says the TII is heaver
i even heard some guy say it was 750 pounds heaver, dont listen to that guy
yea its heaver becuase it has a turbo, intecooler and what not but its not dead weight put into the car.
i even heard some guy say it was 750 pounds heaver, dont listen to that guy
yea its heaver becuase it has a turbo, intecooler and what not but its not dead weight put into the car.
#9
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
blind, it IS heavier. Like it or not. bigger brakes, more hardware (turbo, manifolds, intercooler, piping, electronics), LSD, wheels, everything. But not by alot ... 100-200 pounds in most cases
#10
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The TII is in fact heavier. Depending which models over NA, it has larger brakes and the tranny is about 50lbs heavier than an NA tranny or so I've been told. Then there is other stuff like power windows, rear wiper, power side view mirrors, etc.
Edit: And yeah, the other stuff Fingers mentioned.
Edit: And yeah, the other stuff Fingers mentioned.
#11
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
I have to completely agree with Evil, The N/As are generally better handling than the Turbos, even most of the car mags back in the day picked the N/A 88 GTU over the 88 T2/10th AE, with one mag even calling the 88 GTU the real 10th aniversary model instead of the 10th AE.
The weight is only about 150-200 lbs more in a T2, but its enough to change the dynamics of the car slightly.
The N/A cars are just better balanced between the weight, the engine and the suspension.
I think many people that say he T2 is better, are more speed or boost addicts, that beating someone or the raw HP is all that matters. To me, its the whole package. Its how the suspension works with the car. Its how the power is linear to the tossability. I'd much rather have fun driving a well balanced car, than be in some stop light race with someone with a built big block. Again IMHO people that knock N/As haven't really driven N/As.
And fingers, the brakes are the same for the T2 and most of the other versions. Only the strippy base models didn't get the better brakes.
The weight is only about 150-200 lbs more in a T2, but its enough to change the dynamics of the car slightly.
The N/A cars are just better balanced between the weight, the engine and the suspension.
I think many people that say he T2 is better, are more speed or boost addicts, that beating someone or the raw HP is all that matters. To me, its the whole package. Its how the suspension works with the car. Its how the power is linear to the tossability. I'd much rather have fun driving a well balanced car, than be in some stop light race with someone with a built big block. Again IMHO people that knock N/As haven't really driven N/As.
And fingers, the brakes are the same for the T2 and most of the other versions. Only the strippy base models didn't get the better brakes.
#14
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Originally posted by RylAssassin
so basically n/a's suck.
so basically n/a's suck.
N/As are great. Turbos are great. Each one is good for a particular person and his or her driving preferences...
#16
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Originally posted by RylAssassin
Wow Evil you must really hate turbos.I believe the mushyness you speak of is simply the lag of the turbo when accelerating, and this is easily overcome in higher rpm's, and of corse thats where all the magic happens
Wow Evil you must really hate turbos.I believe the mushyness you speak of is simply the lag of the turbo when accelerating, and this is easily overcome in higher rpm's, and of corse thats where all the magic happens
Originally posted by RylAssassin
TII's are good for drag racing, cornering, drifting, having fun etc.
TII's are good for drag racing, cornering, drifting, having fun etc.
Originally posted by RylAssassin
so basically n/a's suck.
so basically n/a's suck.
#17
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
Yes, as long as they are under vacuum, but they will top out at atmospheric. (Physics/Automotive Geek Inside Joke)
Yes, as long as they are under vacuum, but they will top out at atmospheric. (Physics/Automotive Geek Inside Joke)
#18
It all depends on what you want out of your car, here are the pros and cons i can think of for both:
Turbo:
Pros: Faster for racing, more mods for engine
Cons: Heavier (except for the vert), more expensive, nonlinear power, very little power untill boost comes, not the best car to cruse around in, engines die sooner
N/A:
Pros: Ligher (except the vert), better handling, smooth linear power, quieter engine (no boost sound, which is good if you have a high quality stereo installed), engines last longer, supercharging is an option for more speed which will keep the linearity of the engine, and last but not least they come in convertible
Cons: Without making them totaly unstreetable they wont ever be nearly as fast as a modded TII, weaker drivetrain
So basicaly it all comes down to what is the most important thing for you, do you want all out speed, or do you want more of a ballenced package.
I picked the latter, and bought a vert, i love my vert, its lots of fun, i drive around with the top down all year round , and I live where it snows... and personaly I don't really mind that the engine isnt a turbo, and that the car will never ever by the longest shot run tens, but i really like being able to both drive fast and slow smoothly, be able to listen to my music without a turbo whine coming from the engine, and thats whats important to me
It all depends on what you want out of a car.... just because a lot of the turbo people on this forum are always saying that the way to make an N/A better is to get a TII that isn't nessasarily true.
Turbo:
Pros: Faster for racing, more mods for engine
Cons: Heavier (except for the vert), more expensive, nonlinear power, very little power untill boost comes, not the best car to cruse around in, engines die sooner
N/A:
Pros: Ligher (except the vert), better handling, smooth linear power, quieter engine (no boost sound, which is good if you have a high quality stereo installed), engines last longer, supercharging is an option for more speed which will keep the linearity of the engine, and last but not least they come in convertible
Cons: Without making them totaly unstreetable they wont ever be nearly as fast as a modded TII, weaker drivetrain
So basicaly it all comes down to what is the most important thing for you, do you want all out speed, or do you want more of a ballenced package.
I picked the latter, and bought a vert, i love my vert, its lots of fun, i drive around with the top down all year round , and I live where it snows... and personaly I don't really mind that the engine isnt a turbo, and that the car will never ever by the longest shot run tens, but i really like being able to both drive fast and slow smoothly, be able to listen to my music without a turbo whine coming from the engine, and thats whats important to me
It all depends on what you want out of a car.... just because a lot of the turbo people on this forum are always saying that the way to make an N/A better is to get a TII that isn't nessasarily true.
#19
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We're just lucky that we have so many choices.
A nice weekend drive under the sun, the 'Vert suits well.
Want reliability and still have the great RX7 handling? NA is your choice.
For nearly just as good handling but scary fast speeds, we have the TII.
3 different versions to satisfy every different person. Try that with a MKIII Supra, older 300ZX, 240SX, etc.
A nice weekend drive under the sun, the 'Vert suits well.
Want reliability and still have the great RX7 handling? NA is your choice.
For nearly just as good handling but scary fast speeds, we have the TII.
3 different versions to satisfy every different person. Try that with a MKIII Supra, older 300ZX, 240SX, etc.
#20
I wish I had a posse...
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio-Boycott Central
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I own a 90 TII, and I love the way that it drives, even though it hasn't moved under its own power in 1.5 years. The acceleration is explosive, the handling is great and it brought a smile to my face everytime I launched it into a corner, or floored the gas in 3rd gear.
However, I used to own a 88 GXL that was killed by a semi-truck last year. I loved the way that the car felt like an extension of my body, unlike the TII that was a bit more "soft" (I attribute that mostly to a blown shock, 96K miles on the chassis and the 89-91 sway-bar mounts. All of which are easily remedied.)
I'm also not really concerned with brute acceleration either. If you're looking to get into races with 'Stangs or Hondas in addition to sopping up the corners, buy a TII. If you like the purest form of the driving experience, get a N/A.
However, I used to own a 88 GXL that was killed by a semi-truck last year. I loved the way that the car felt like an extension of my body, unlike the TII that was a bit more "soft" (I attribute that mostly to a blown shock, 96K miles on the chassis and the 89-91 sway-bar mounts. All of which are easily remedied.)
I'm also not really concerned with brute acceleration either. If you're looking to get into races with 'Stangs or Hondas in addition to sopping up the corners, buy a TII. If you like the purest form of the driving experience, get a N/A.
#21
Originally posted by ZachSpazz
If you like the purest form of the driving experience, get a N/A.
If you like the purest form of the driving experience, get a N/A.
buying a turboII will result in changing a person!
turboII's - turnning an everyday car owner into mechanics since 1987!
#23
I wish I had a posse...
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio-Boycott Central
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jacobcartmill
you can say that again man.
you can say that again man.