2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

turbo 2 or twin turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2006 | 10:32 PM
  #51  
MaczPayne's Avatar
Mac Attack
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 22
From: California
Icemark, I was about to say that too. The welds don't look that secure, and I don't like how the arms extend far beyond the base where it meets the frame. Looks very unsafe.

But then again, I haven't seen one in use, and I cannot say anymore.
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 11:10 PM
  #52  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by MaczPayne
Icemark, I was about to say that too. The welds don't look that secure, and I don't like how the arms extend far beyond the base where it meets the frame. Looks very unsafe.

But then again, I haven't seen one in use, and I cannot say anymore.
Their Mazdaspeed7's design, their in his car. PM him for questions and ****.
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 06:14 AM
  #53  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by Jager
So far, all the mounts I've seen for 13B-REW into an FC chassis all were like this.

It's a BAD design.

Can you figure out why?


-Ted
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 06:39 AM
  #54  
Apathy's Avatar
dAracIngPhaRmaCist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale
lol. yea. The mounts do look very questionable and I cant find any info of people who actually tried them. Oh, well. I still got mounts for the Cosmo. :>D
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 08:44 AM
  #55  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by RETed
So far, all the mounts I've seen for 13B-REW into an FC chassis all were like this.
It's a BAD design.
Can you figure out why?
-Ted
Because the entire weight of the engine is supported by one wall of the body mount cup. There's no reinforcement or gusseting anywhere, the penetration of the welds looks questionable and the through holes for the engine side of the mount bolts are way too thin.

What do I win?
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 10:03 AM
  #56  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Close...but no cigar.

Examine all the stock engine mounts...
They are designed to take weight vertically.

Look at those mounts...
The weight is loaded sideways...which twists.
It's a bad design.


-Ted
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #57  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by RETed
Close...but no cigar.

Examine all the stock engine mounts...
They are designed to take weight vertically.

Look at those mounts...
The weight is loaded sideways...which twists.
It's a bad design.


-Ted
I was just posting the mounts existance. That was all .

Also they are pretty new, so you won't find any info on them.
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 09:31 PM
  #58  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
That design has been around for a while.
It's just that someone finally got the ***** to try and sell them.
I knew one guy who had them made way back in 1995 - 1996.


-Ted
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 18, 2015 10:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.