2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Timing question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 01:19 PM
  #1  
jkimbro's Avatar
Thread Starter
resU deretsigeR
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Yep
Timing question

background:

Okay, so I ligned up the marks on my CAS, and ligned up my leading mark on the pulley with the needle on the front cover....and stabbed the CAS.

Doing this, the car ran okay.....it was weak, but as expected with a fresh rebuild. I put around 50 miles on the car with the initial "stab".

I went to a friends house, and got a timing gun. When I checked the timing with a gun...the leading mark was at 10 o'clock (if looking at a clock, and using the needle on the front cover as my 12 o'clock). So, just adjusting the CAS without pulling it out and restabbing wouldn't bring it all the way back to "perfect" time.

So, I restab, and start the car up again...I lign everything up "perfect" on the leading, and trailing according to the timing gun (at 1300 rpms). The idle sounded better than the initial stab.

I'm expecting this to have a positive effect on the car, but when I try to drive it....it's weaker than it was on the initial stab.


Now.....to my questions......

Will it hurt to put my timing back to where it was on the initial stab? At least until I can get the car broken in a bit more to where it'll idle around 750-800...

In relation to my 2nd stab, is my 1st stab more advanced, or retarded?

Thanx.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #2  
deadRX7Conv's Avatar
Opinions are like........
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 879
Likes: 1
From: Prov RI
Do you have the stock pulley?

Timing should be checked hot, no load, with test connector grounded, at 750 rpm and not 1300 rpm.

Restab and make sure CAS marks stay put.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 07:41 AM
  #3  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Put it back to how it was.
You're not supposed to be pounding it anyways, so the slightly off ignition timing won't hurt anything.
It sounds like the original CAS stab was more correct.
At 1,300RPM, that's some significant ignition timing advance already, so you just backed all of that out.
If anything, you can crank the CAS for a little more advance (timing mark moves clockwise) to help the car driving around better...


-Ted
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #4  
jkimbro's Avatar
Thread Starter
resU deretsigeR
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Yep
Thanx guys.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
smikels
Rtek Forum
4
May 12, 2016 12:34 AM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Aug 26, 2015 09:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 PM.