2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

time slip whats wrong

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-02, 10:15 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
time slip whats wrong

1st run
rt-.629
60-2.444
330-6.956
no 1/8
et-16.626
mph-83.391

2nd run
rt-.914
60-2.125
330-7.687
1/8-11.841
mph-56.097
et-18.396
mph-78.263
did not go in to 2nd or 3rd gear

3rd run
rt-.503
60-2.304
330-7.000
1/8-10.960
mph-62.541
1000-14.282
et-17.035
mph-82.584

4th run
rt-.726
60-2.414
330-6.994
1/8-10.870
mph-63.970
1000-14.149
et-16.947
mph81.171

i have a 86 gxl mods:racingbeat header road race,one cat,k&n filter,tb mod,msd spark plug wires,no a/c,89+intake manifold with the vdi not working it is wired open
what is wrong with my car. i don't think the 6 ports are working because the hose keeps coming off the air pump.and i think i have a vacuum leak.

Last edited by rx-7fc; 05-09-02 at 10:32 PM.
Old 05-09-02, 10:24 PM
  #2  
We come with the Hardcore

iTrader: (2)
 
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With a reaction time of almost a full second at 2 points, I'd say you just can't drive... that and you're probably shifting too early. What RPM do you shift at? And how do you launch? Also, the 6th ports are vacuum actuated, so it sounds like the header/cat thig might have fucked with them...

I'm not very good with S4, so I'll let the others give you spacifics.
Old 05-09-02, 10:30 PM
  #3  
We come with the Hardcore

iTrader: (2)
 
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, were you granny shifting? And not double clutching like you should? Sorry, couldn't resist.

Anyway, I just remember reading about the VDI manifold swap. Unless the VDI works, you're actually looking at a DROP in power, over the stock S4. Just something to think about...
Old 05-09-02, 10:40 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i sift at about almost 70000 and i launch between 4000-5000 but in differnt runs.no granny shifting and no double clutching.and i have to order the thing to make the vdi work and also thinking on putting my old intake manifold back on
Old 05-09-02, 10:41 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and your rt can not be under .500 or you will get red lighted
Old 05-09-02, 10:46 PM
  #6  
We come with the Hardcore

iTrader: (2)
 
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
70000! WOAH! THAT'S HIGH!

7K is about right for a S4 ( If I remember right ) Appearantly your Tree system is different than ours. As a guess.... 6th ports are killing your times. And the VDI isn't helping. Fix those, and reach for the 15's LoL
Old 05-10-02, 12:04 AM
  #7  
Has been.. hangin' around

 
Silkworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks to me that run #2 you finally got a decent launch, but for some reason, you shut it down.

In all other cases, 2.4s isn't getting the job done. Focus on getting the launch, and the better times will come.

PaulC
Old 05-10-02, 12:10 AM
  #8  
...

 
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know what your complaining about, in my damn TII I got a 16.1 or something. It is stock but thats wayyyyy too damn slow for it. That second run looks like you could have gotten a 16.1 or 16.2. If your aux. ports aren't working then don't bother worrying about these times.
Old 05-10-02, 12:17 AM
  #9  
von
Rotary Freak

 
von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: sandiego, ca
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Those times are embarasing...Im around 14.9 in my 89GXL... I beat a 15.3 runing car by 3.5 car lengths. Wire your 6th ports open. Get some stickier tires like those Nitto Drag radials and whach your times go down.
Old 05-10-02, 12:27 AM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in the 2nd run the grear did not go in but only in 2nd and 3rd.at the end of the 1/4 i don't even shift to 4th gear but the last run i did
Old 05-10-02, 12:32 AM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
von what kind of mods do you have
Old 05-10-02, 01:09 AM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
FC3AZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would be a little concerned. You got a sweet 60' time in run #2. I ran my 16.3 with a 2.4 60' time, I wish I could pull 2.1's. Just more practice is my suggestion. And if times still dont get better, then I would start to look for a problem in the horsepower dept.
Old 05-10-02, 03:48 AM
  #13  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Your 60' times are inconsistent (as most have pointed out) - my advice is to practice and get them down under 2.2 - you did it on the 2nd run, but the misshift killed the ET.&nbsp You guys think it's so easy to go drag racing...



-Ted
Old 05-10-02, 08:40 AM
  #14  
Despise Enmity

 
Josepi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reaction time doesn't matter in T/T. I agree with Ted, your 60's are kinda high. I don't think it's a car problem, more so of a inexperienced track driver kind of problem. How are you launching?
Old 05-10-02, 04:02 PM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i am launching between 4000rpm to 5000 but was testing it in differnt runs to see what did better
Old 05-10-02, 04:10 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
PraxRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Alberta
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmmfff...

You people and your 15 second N/A's geez

You make my Turbo II feel like a slow POS.

Although I was pullin 15.3's last year, that was with fully clogged exhaust, and nothing done to the car yet.

Well this year I am saying Hello to the low 14's.
Old 05-10-02, 04:25 PM
  #17  
...

 
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: hmmmfff...

Originally posted by PraxRX7
You people and your 15 second N/A's geez

You make my Turbo II feel like a slow POS.

Although I was pullin 15.3's last year, that was with fully clogged exhaust, and nothing done to the car yet.

Well this year I am saying Hello to the low 14's.
Try 16.1 in a TII! Now thats slow ****. I gotta do something with it.
Old 05-10-02, 04:42 PM
  #18  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Re: Re: hmmmfff...

Originally posted by Ryde _Or_Die
Try 16.1 in a TII! Now thats slow ****. I gotta do something with it.
Been there - done that!&nbsp 16.20!&nbsp Are we gonn try and brag to see who has the SLOWEST time now?


-Ted
Old 05-10-02, 04:45 PM
  #19  
...

 
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey my second run was a 16.5, lol. Gotcha!
Old 05-10-02, 04:46 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
PraxRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Alberta
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LoL

my slowest run in my 7 was my first run, 17.8...

I stalled it out at the start and still got that time =P
Old 05-10-02, 04:53 PM
  #21  
...

 
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: LoL

Originally posted by PraxRX7
my slowest run in my 7 was my first run, 17.8...

I stalled it out at the start and still got that time =P
That was prolly in an NA too, lol.
Old 05-10-02, 04:56 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

 
PraxRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Alberta
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: LoL

Originally posted by Ryde _Or_Die


That was prolly in an NA too, lol.
Nope...that was my Turbo II, it was only a week or 2 after I had bought....bad experience, everyone was laughing at me

Then I pulled off my 15.337 and people were still laughing at me....

They expected my car to be like Jack's...12.9s FD =/

Well soon mine will be a 13-14s FC, but that is as fast as I want it to be.
Old 05-10-02, 11:15 PM
  #23  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how much slower will it be if the 6 ports are not woking than having them working.and should i put my old intake manifold back on it is a s4 86-88
Old 05-11-02, 12:44 AM
  #24  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bump
Old 05-11-02, 06:25 AM
  #25  
Full Member

 
2887s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: LoL

Originally posted by PraxRX7
my slowest run in my 7 was my first run, 17.8...

I stalled it out at the start and still got that time =P
I got a 17.2 in my vert when it was stock.


Quick Reply: time slip whats wrong



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.