2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

TII or NA????????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 04:21 AM
  #1  
Ueafa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
TII or NA????????

Ok, I have wanted a 7 for a while. I sorta ventured off after I payed off my credit card because a friend fucked me over (left the state and stuck me with the missing money). So since I have that payed off now finally, I was getting into bikes, but still have a love for the 7 because my friends have some. Anyhow, my question is, what would be better in your opinions. To go with a TII or NA? I live in Arizona, so the turbo will get some nice dry AZ hot air, which will make me lower the boost to save it. NA is another option, because I don't have to worry about a turbo. I know with a TII you can make more hp with less money, correct? NA will take a little money, unless porting it and taking some of the engine life away (granted modding in general will do so). If I go the way of NA, I will more than likely spray too. Its a tough decision right now, because my thoughts are completely split and go either way. Thats why I come here to get some advice and opinions on this matter. As for cost, I don't wish to spend that much on the car to start out with, granted everyone wishes that though. I don't have that much, only about $1k right now, since the credit card killed me, and set me back. Also, which would help on insurance? Or would it not really matter that much? Thanks for listening, and for giving opinions.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 04:48 AM
  #2  
Ueafa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
anyone????
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 04:51 AM
  #3  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
N/a
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 04:55 AM
  #4  
Ueafa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally posted by 1987RX7guy
N/a
Could you give me reasons why? Granted you have an NA, but why choose NA, besides saying "NA rules, Turbo sucks"
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 04:56 AM
  #5  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Well simplicity, reliability, feeling more balnced.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 05:00 AM
  #6  
ShadowX's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: PF, MD
You really need to question why you want an RX-7. They aren't really meant to be drag cars, so getting an N/A and using nitrous kinda defeats the purpose.
I've got a TII so obviously I'm a little biased. If you want more power, get a TII. If you want dependability and a responsive engine, get an N/A.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 05:04 AM
  #7  
Ueafa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally posted by ShadowX
You really need to question why you want an RX-7. They aren't really meant to be drag cars, so getting an N/A and using nitrous kinda defeats the purpose.
I've got a TII so obviously I'm a little biased. If you want more power, get a TII. If you want dependability and a responsive engine, get an N/A.
I wish for an RX7 because its a rotary, nice space to work with in the engine bay once all the nonsense is rid of. I don't plan on turning it into a drag car, NOS would be used to get it up and scootin', along with extra power. For reliability though, if its taken care of right, driven right (given the fact its gonna get some WOT sometimes and everyday abuse) it would be able to last the same TII and NA wise, correct? Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #8  
cloead's Avatar
sold--no longer in debt
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 11
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: TII or NA????????

Originally posted by Ueafa
Also, which would help on insurance? Or would it not really matter that much?

I don't think it really matters much. =/ Insurance on my T2 is $805 a half with liability and fire/theft.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 09:45 AM
  #9  
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta.Georgia
its really up to you. both cars have there plus and minuses. If you wanna set any goals as in to runnin 12s or better you might as well go t2. to much money for a n/a
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 10:01 AM
  #10  
Roy James's Avatar
My cars louder than yours
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA
um... N/A is for people who cant afford Turbo. Thats a fact.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #11  
Fitness Stain's Avatar
Yar-Har-Har
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, 37217
TURBO!

they may be alittle more complicated, but man its a TURBO.....you cant beat it with a stick......and with you being in AZ there has to be some LONG...STRAIGHT...roads there....perfect for maxing out 4th.....

if you get an N/A...most likely you'll just end up wanting more....

but personally i wish i had an N/A backup, so when my TII goes down i have another one to have fun with....

if i had to pick just one though.......TII!!
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 11:51 AM
  #12  
kiker14's Avatar
finally back in an RX-7!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Northern New Jersey
if you only have 1k... you pretty much will have to go with a n/a, and good luck finding one for 1k or less that is in good running condition... my n/a was 850 and needed at least 1100 in repairs (and it still isn't running) granted, mine did have 206k miles when i got it...
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 12:18 PM
  #13  
Suds7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
With turbo the car actually feels like its power backs up its good handling, the feeling increases as you modify engine and suspension. N/a is just too limited in my opinion. N/a for the daily grind, turbo for fun!
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:34 PM
  #14  
Ueafa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally posted by kiker14
if you only have 1k... you pretty much will have to go with a n/a, and good luck finding one for 1k or less that is in good running condition... my n/a was 850 and needed at least 1100 in repairs (and it still isn't running) granted, mine did have 206k miles when i got it...
Thats all that I have saved up now, but will be able to get around.....$3-4k in the next month or so. But anyhow I will be going with a TII. Can't wait to get one now. Thanks for all the input, did help with my decisions. As for having long straight roads out here, damn right, granted they are a good drive to get to some, but once you get on them, your in open country and nothing will stop you except a blown motor, hehe.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:37 PM
  #15  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally posted by Roy James
um... N/A is for people who cant afford Turbo. Thats a fact.
I'm sorry....WHAT?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:40 PM
  #16  
Ueafa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally posted by Aaron Cake
I'm sorry....WHAT?
HAHA, I am sensing some hostility over here a bit. What are some good sites to check out for aftermarket mods? I used to have a few, but my computer had to get formatted, so I lost quite a few, so if you would be able to list some, that would be great. Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:46 PM
  #17  
Dan H's Avatar
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Take it from someone who's had both. I've had an '88 NA but now own an '87 Turbo II.

For pure driving experience (through the turns), responsiveness (both throttle and steering), and less headaches, you should get an NA. The handling is more predictable too compared to a TII when you're boost kicks in during a turn. The NA engines do last longer than TII's too.

But if you want a lot more power, the TII will take you there much more quicker and cheaper. Only at the expense of being slightly less responsive. Remember, TII's weigh more than NA's and have some turbo lag. The maintenance is higher and a higher possibility of something going wrong. I'm in the process of trying to get my TII to handle better with aftermarket suspension upgrades.

But anyways, if you care about straightline speed and willing to put up with the higher maintenance, the TII is for you. NA's are great for everything else other than straightline speed. If I could, I would own both.

Last edited by Dan H; Jul 25, 2003 at 03:49 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #18  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
People have this odd bias against NAs. Don't know why.

Lots of sites out there....Mazdatrix.com, racingbeat.com, RX-7.com, RX7store.net (.com?), this forum, etc.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:49 PM
  #19  
vectorminds's Avatar
Where's My Fuel???
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by Roy James
um... N/A is for people who cant afford Turbo. Thats a fact.
so thats why my n/a costs more than a turbo... im confused



but in your price range id say n/a all the way...

Last edited by vectorminds; Jul 25, 2003 at 03:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:51 PM
  #20  
DEZERTE's Avatar
777** The Anti-rice
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally posted by Roy James
um... N/A is for people who cant afford Turbo. Thats a fact.
stupid.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #21  
DEZERTE's Avatar
777** The Anti-rice
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally posted by Ueafa
HAHA, I am sensing some hostility over here a bit. What are some good sites to check out for aftermarket mods? I used to have a few, but my computer had to get formatted, so I lost quite a few, so if you would be able to list some, that would be great. Thanks.
www.mazdatrix.com
www.racingbeat.com <--go there for exhaust
www.corksport.com
www.rx7.com

some other ones also those are just some of the well known ones
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 05:00 PM
  #22  
mpowers8's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
FD for the track, FC vert for daily drivin', 99 Miata for backup daily drivin'.

At least that's my setup

Edited for Sig ..

Last edited by mpowers8; Jul 25, 2003 at 05:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 08:20 PM
  #23  
vectorminds's Avatar
Where's My Fuel???
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: NJ
^^ thats a good setup, i like that.... although id need a hardtop fwd / awd econobox something to drive around in the winter / snow / rain
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 08:37 PM
  #24  
Roy James's Avatar
My cars louder than yours
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA
Originally posted by DEZERTE
stupid.
*edited for content flaming, and obscenities are against forum rules*.

To the original poster, since my previous post was too vauge for the *edited for content flaming* on this forum ill have to be specific.N/A is not what you want if you want to go fast, but they are cheaper. Most people who get an N/A wish they would have gotten a turbo. Aaron Cake himself is one of these people (it seems, unless he just likes spending money on custom building a turbo kit for his car). He obviously wasnt satisfied with the N/A power just like you probably will be if you get one.

Last edited by Icemark; Jul 26, 2003 at 10:57 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 09:19 PM
  #25  
Dan H's Avatar
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Cool it guys...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.