TII - Mazda added weight to keep 50/50?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TII - Mazda added weight to keep 50/50?
there is a large difference in weight between the base and tii model (~200lbs). i have experience w/ turbo systems and i couldnt believe that it would add 200lbs.
i researched it and came across some info about Mazda adding weight to the rear of the TII models to keep the "notorious 50/50" weight distribution. the jack and spare supposedly weigh a lil more, along w/ other changes.
is there any truth to this? and if so, what changes did they make to add weight?
p.s. i understand weight reduction. please don't reply saying, "take out ur a/c, p/s, and go on a diet." i jus was wondering if there is any truth to wut i saw and i didnt bookmark the page to throw u a link. sorry.
i researched it and came across some info about Mazda adding weight to the rear of the TII models to keep the "notorious 50/50" weight distribution. the jack and spare supposedly weigh a lil more, along w/ other changes.
is there any truth to this? and if so, what changes did they make to add weight?
p.s. i understand weight reduction. please don't reply saying, "take out ur a/c, p/s, and go on a diet." i jus was wondering if there is any truth to wut i saw and i didnt bookmark the page to throw u a link. sorry.
#2
Goes *round*round*round*
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stonger transmission, driveshaft, rear end, turbo and all systems to make that work. Those would add up a bit.
The jacks and spare tires are all the same.
Plus, the Turbos tended to have more accessories like power windows, mirrors, sunroof, leather interior and stuff like that.
The jacks and spare tires are all the same.
Plus, the Turbos tended to have more accessories like power windows, mirrors, sunroof, leather interior and stuff like that.
#6
knowledge junkie
What we know about RX-7s & weight:
- base models get the lightweight drivetrain & brake package (verts get the HD brakes)
- Convertibles used thicker gauge metal to help with chassis flex
- Convertibles did go through a 3rd weight reduction to help with power:weight a bit
- S5s may have gone through a 2nd weight reduction
- The concept rx-7s went through a weight reduction before release to the public
Some argue the S5 (vs S4) lightweight components were for cost savings, others say weight savings.
- base models get the lightweight drivetrain & brake package (verts get the HD brakes)
- Convertibles used thicker gauge metal to help with chassis flex
- Convertibles did go through a 3rd weight reduction to help with power:weight a bit
- S5s may have gone through a 2nd weight reduction
- The concept rx-7s went through a weight reduction before release to the public
Some argue the S5 (vs S4) lightweight components were for cost savings, others say weight savings.
#7
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Originally Posted by OJmobileII
i researched it and came across some info about Mazda adding weight to the rear of the TII models to keep the "notorious 50/50" weight distribution. the jack and spare supposedly weigh a lil more, along w/ other changes.
is there any truth to this? and if so, what changes did they make to add weight?
is there any truth to this? and if so, what changes did they make to add weight?
The extra weight that a Turbo has is because of the bigger rear end, the bigger driveshaft, the bigger drive axels, the turbo, the bigger tranny, etc.
All split around front and rear.
And Turbos are 51/49 weight distribution. Not 50/50.
Trending Topics
#8
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Originally Posted by vaughnc
Some argue the S5 (vs S4) lightweight components were for cost savings, others say weight savings.
If cost was not an issue, things like the uderlichet german Jack that Mazda got special from germany would still have been on the S5 coupes.
There was no additional weight savings on S5 models. There was just a lesser concern about weight and a increased concern about costs.
#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thank u for all ur information. its a good thing i didnt bookmark that page then. i wasnt concerned w/ 50/50 (Icemark pointed out its 51/49) weight. i was jus shocked to here that Mazda would add weight for any reason.
#11
IFO Forced Induction Slo
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vaughnc
What we know about RX-7s & weight:
- Convertibles used thicker gauge metal to help with chassis flex
- Convertibles used thicker gauge metal to help with chassis flex
#12
I'm bastardizing my car!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Naperville, IL.
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
The S5 models had heavier, not lighter components than S4 models.
If cost was not an issue, things like the uderlichet german Jack that Mazda got special from germany would still have been on the S5 coupes.
There was no additional weight savings on S5 models. There was just a lesser concern about weight and a increased concern about costs.
If cost was not an issue, things like the uderlichet german Jack that Mazda got special from germany would still have been on the S5 coupes.
There was no additional weight savings on S5 models. There was just a lesser concern about weight and a increased concern about costs.
#13
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Originally Posted by OC_
What parts of the s5's where heavier? I hear it is only the dash and sound insulation, was there more?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
08-11-15 03:47 PM