2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

is there such thing as "to big" of a down pipe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #1  
88rxn/a's Avatar
Thread Starter
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
is there such thing as "to big" of a down pipe?

im looking at a couple down pipes. a 3 inch and a 4 inch. i was curious to know if there is such a thing as to big of a down pipe? ill be running a fresh streetported S4 with a HKS "LOG" manifold with a turbonetics 62-1 with .96 hotside and remaing exhaust will be 3 inch high flow cat and a 3 inch HKS HI_POWER old school exhaust.

here are the downpipes:

4 inch:
http://www.himni-racing.com/index.ph...oducts_id=1025

or 3 inch:
http://www.himni-racing.com/index.ph...roducts_id=839
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #2  
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
1.3L piston eater
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, Canada
im running a 80mm downpipe (little bigger then 3 inches) its fine , the bigger the better!
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #3  
J-Rat's Avatar
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
Turbos like to breathe!
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #4  
veedubbed's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: USA
The faster that the exhaust gets out of the turbo, the faster it will spool.... so yes, bigger=better.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 05:33 PM
  #5  
RockLobster's Avatar
Let's get silly...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 10
From: Rosemount, MN
If it is a turbo car the short answer is no, the bigger the better.

The long answer involves issues of the stock turbo, wastegate, and boostcreep. The less exhaust back pressure the greater the propensity for boostcreep.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #6  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by 88rxn/a
i was curious to know if there is such a thing as to big of a down pipe?
If there were no such thing as too big, all of the performance downpipes would be 18" diameter or larger.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #7  
hurleysurf24's Avatar
wtf rotary wtf
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: Who knows
you need some level of back pressure .. but at the same poiint you want it to be free flowing as possible. if the diameter is larger then the outlet on the exhaust side then the point is moot.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #8  
88rxn/a's Avatar
Thread Starter
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
it has a 3inch outlet on the turbo.
i wasnt sure. i figured bigger DP = faster spooling.
plus the 4 inch is ONLY about 10 bucks more.

Last edited by 88rxn/a; Aug 4, 2007 at 06:40 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #9  
veedubbed's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: USA
If it's only a 3" outlet, and you're going to be running 3" parts on down the exhaust line there, then there is no point to run 4" at the downpipe only to have it restricted before and after.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #10  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
You don't need any backpressure. Turbos need as large a pressure differential between the turbine inlet and outlet as possible. The only real limitation is physical space. After about 4", it becomes difficult to package things in the engine bay (you still need room to remove and install the pipe, and for wastegate plumbing).
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #11  
88rxn/a's Avatar
Thread Starter
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
that was another issue i wondered about was packing a wastegate and piping for that. id like to have a 4 inch but i am curious as to actually how much room there would be?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #12  
RockLobster's Avatar
Let's get silly...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 10
From: Rosemount, MN
Also, at some point it is a game of diminishing returns. When you are putting out power in the 700-800 HP range, the difference between 3" and 4" is quite a bit different than in the 300-400 HP range.

Depending on the turbo and fuel system you are running going from 3" to 4" may do very little for you other than cause space issues as previously mentioned.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #13  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by 88rxn/a
that was another issue i wondered about was packing a wastegate and piping for that. id like to have a 4 inch but i am curious as to actually how much room there would be?
My pipe is just under 4" OD and it fit without too many issues. Which is pretty good, considering how far the NA intake sticks out compared to the TII.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #14  
88rxn/a's Avatar
Thread Starter
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
ok, thanks. i think ill go with the 4 inch.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.