2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

tb mod results and a question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2003 | 10:13 PM
  #1  
ajsuper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nothin But a G Thang
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
tb mod results and a question

well i got bored and did the tb mod, it feels great, the engine revs faster and much smoother and idles just fine. it seems to have a little more power and torque across the whole rev range. so i say anyone thinking of doing this should. one question is that when my engine is not under load ie..idling or in neutral while braking the engine light comes on, but once i hit the gas it goes away. has anyone had a similar problem like this? ill pull the error code tomarrow cuz i dont feel like doing it in the dark.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2003 | 10:45 PM
  #2  
hybridracer's Avatar
I Post In The Nude
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: College Station
Didnt have that problem when I did it. It will help when you pull the code though
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2003 | 11:14 PM
  #3  
loofeeTurboII's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
i'm a newbie and i'm stupid..what is TB mod??
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #4  
hybridracer's Avatar
I Post In The Nude
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: College Station
Goodness, its when you remove the secondary throttle plates and the cold start assist in the process, supposidly giving you better throttle response.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2003 | 11:32 PM
  #5  
loofeeTurboII's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
ok....how exactly do u u do that?? please show me the light or maybe a link how to..thank you
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2003 | 11:52 PM
  #6  
Amur_'s Avatar
Refined Valley Dude
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: Kitchener, Ontario (Hamilton's armpit)
http://fc3s-pro.com/TECH/HOWTO/TBM/tbm.html
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 12:00 AM
  #7  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: kamloops b.c
can u do this mod on a n\a? or is it just turbo?

also what are the advantages? and whats bad about it?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 12:16 AM
  #8  
Amur_'s Avatar
Refined Valley Dude
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: Kitchener, Ontario (Hamilton's armpit)
You can do it to an NA as well. Some people love it, others have complained bitterly about the results.

Feedback and comments:
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...light=throttle


Porting the intake manifolds:
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=79511


edit: another write-up -- http://fc3s-pro.com/TECH/HOWTO/TBM/tbm.html

Last edited by Amur_; Mar 23, 2003 at 12:25 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 12:18 AM
  #9  
dr0x's Avatar
pei > caek
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 0
From: Mars
Probably something with the TPS
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 12:23 AM
  #10  
BlackRx7's Avatar
Daily Domestic Killer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,425
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Tx, USA
it fucked my **** up UP, luckly I found a UIM and TB with BAC, TPS and all the stuff on the upp intake mani...for 30 bux!!!! gonna try and keep it stock much more low end....
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 04:51 AM
  #11  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by jwall
can u do this mod on a n\a? or is it just turbo?
The NA TB works differently to the turbo one. The turbo's #2 secondary plates have a delayed action, so removing them improves throttle resonse. The NA ones don't have this delay, so there's much less effect from removing them.
also what are the advantages? and whats bad about it?
There's a small improvement in flow from the lack of restriction.
Note that the removal of the thermowax (cold-start idle-up system) is not required for this to work. It's a seperate system that can be left functioning normally. Removing it will mean the engine will not idle until it warms up.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 11:52 AM
  #12  
hybridracer's Avatar
I Post In The Nude
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: College Station
Also, make sure you use the appropriate materials if you do decide to take out the cold start assist. Rico05 I believe used JB Weld and thinks it may have been the downfall to his engine I believe. I think he said he found little peices of jb weld in his engine.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 12:17 PM
  #13  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Originally posted by NZConvertible

Note that the removal of the thermowax (cold-start idle-up system) is not required for this to work. It's a seperate system that can be left functioning normally. Removing it will mean the engine will not idle until it warms up.
That is wrong. The thermowax pushes the TB open a little more allowing more air, and the TPS compensates with extra fuel. Removing it will NOT keep the car from idling until its warm. Ive seen that problem way too many times, and I can tell you its always vacuum leaks that keep the car from idling until its warm. Ive got a ported motor, all emissions removed, TB mod, etc, and my car will hold a solid idle right after you start it.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 02:55 PM
  #14  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
However, removing the cold start thermowax may make the car hard to drive in cold weather until the engine warms up. I say leave the cold start system. My version of the TB mod is simply removal of the secondary throttle butterflies, leaving everything else in place. All the benefits, none of the downfalls.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 04:12 PM
  #15  
Scott 89t2's Avatar
SOLD THE RX-7!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I just started mine up today for the first time cold after doing it. and it won't hold it's idle. I gota hold the pedel down for around 20-30 secs then it'll hold an idle.

water temps were at 55F before starting. I let off at 80F and it held.


my warm idle is set at the stock 750. if I bumbed that up abit, it would probably hold when cold.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #16  
pip's Avatar
pip
the blackest incarnation
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Talking

Originally posted by Amur_
[B]You can do it to an NA as well. Some people love it, others have complained bitterly about the results.
Like how JBWeld doesnt compress nearly as well as gasoline?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 08:20 PM
  #17  
saltlakebay's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
I just started mine up today for the first time cold after doing it. and it won't hold it's idle. I gota hold the pedel down for around 20-30 secs then it'll hold an idle.
Here is where I was asking about that:

https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=168628
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 08:37 PM
  #18  
BlackRx7's Avatar
Daily Domestic Killer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,425
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Tx, USA
I removed the the cold start and fast idle when doing it and my car still jumped up to 3krpms when started....and its pretty stupid to say you have a vaccum leak if you car doesn't hold a solid idle right after you crank it, after it gets warmed up I'm assuming the vac read is fine and in scotts case he has no vacum rac so there arn't that many places to have a vac leak
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2003 | 12:49 AM
  #19  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by mazdaspeed7
The thermowax pushes the TB open a little more allowing more air...
That's right...
...and the TPS compensates with extra fuel.
No it doesn't. The TPS has very little to do with fuel delivery. The extra air is measured by the AFM and fuel is added accordingly. It's no different to opening the throttle using the gas pedal. Mixtures are then enrichened based on info from the coolant thermosensor.
Removing it will NOT keep the car from idling until its warm.
I'll clarify then. Removing it will keep the engine from idling properly until its warm.
Ive seen that problem way too many times, and I can tell you its always vacuum leaks that keep the car from idling until its warm.
I'm sure that is a common cause of idle problems, particularly when the TB has been removed and reinstalled, but if this system wasn't needed, Mazda wouldn't have put it there!
Ive got a ported motor, all emissions removed, TB mod, etc, and my car will hold a solid idle right after you start it.
What's your idle set at? Does it hold a smooth 750rpm when warm? Can it do that cold?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2003 | 08:05 AM
  #20  
ajsuper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nothin But a G Thang
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
well it was the tps that needed adjustment, im still fine tuning the idle to get it correct, its not the most fun thing to do concidering i my open exhaust wakes up the neighborhood...o well
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2003 | 09:12 AM
  #21  
RylAssassin's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Boston
well it was the tps that needed adjustment, im still fine tuning the idle to get it correct, its not the most fun thing to do concidering i my open exhaust wakes up the neighborhood...o well
LOL Your supposed to do the tps adjustment with the car off.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #22  
SureShot's Avatar
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
My main reason for the TB mod was to remove that small coolant hose from under the UIM. It had failed on my 87. That was the only time I ever towed the rex.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2003 | 11:58 AM
  #23  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
*****still jumped up to 3krpms when started****

That's a function of the bac and the Air Bypass Solenoid, not the thermowax.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2003 | 02:08 PM
  #24  
ajsuper7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nothin But a G Thang
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
yes i understand this, but i have to start it and make sure everything works right...which 9 times out of 10 doesnt b/c i am still trying to get a normal idle back or atlest below 1000rpms
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #25  
KiyoKix's Avatar
13B N/A POWA!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
I removed the plates on my '86 N/A, I have had no problems with the car afterward (except the whole not being tagged thing )...it was definately at great mod in my opinion.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.