2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Supras Vs. Rx7's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-02, 02:52 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
RylAssassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Supras Vs. Rx7's

Can you guys explain to me the difference between the older supras and the 2nd gen rx7's??
I mean horsepower is higher in the Turbo Supra modles and they are a little larger and heavier but lets say someone doing research into both cars was considering both cars what would make a perosn buy a 200hp TII over a 240 hp Supra turbo?
Beleive me i am a loyal Rx7 fan but the reason im asking is my best freind is insiting on buying a Supra cuz he only sees the hp advantage he keeps tellin me hes gonna kick my *** wit his supra and i beleive him cuz of the huge hp defference. I have an 88 N/A and I LOVE IT but i cant seem to convince him to get an rx7 cuz he thinks theyd be too slow

Lemmie know your opinios -THANKS!
Old 06-28-02, 02:57 PM
  #2  
I Raise Chickens

 
cymfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Half Moon Bay, CA
Posts: 1,219
Received 35 Likes on 17 Posts
Max HP isnt all that matters. If 2nd gens did not handle good and couldnt make any power, would there really be this much interest in them? There is much much greater interest in turboII's than MVIII supra turbos.
Old 06-28-02, 03:04 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
No7Yet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, if it's his MkIII Supra Turbo vs. your N/A 7, he's right - he'll wipe the floor with you

The TII is IIRC slightly faster stock than the MkIII-T, but has much more aftermarket support. The RX-7 has more "cheap" mods available. Fact is, speed costs money, and whoever has the most money will have the most speed.

Not to mention that the RX-7 looks better, handles better, is smaller and more tossable, is cheaper, etc.

Brandon
Old 06-28-02, 05:17 PM
  #4  
Junior Member

 
The 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: AZ/ Chi-Town
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its all about a tight handling
small sharp *** car!!!
**** flying down a straight line or
road. its how smooth you can hit the turns
also ( i dont know much about this)but drive tran
and hp/weight ratio.
i would way rather have an rx-7 even if its slower
at first its better handling bottom line
Old 06-28-02, 05:19 PM
  #5  
WTB S5 N/A FC

 
rico05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: College Station, Tx
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have beaten a guy I know in his MKIII Turbo. I almost bought one, but the used car dealership caught on fire before I could buy it. I take it as a sign from God Supra's are gross, heavy, poor handling cars IMO.
Old 06-28-02, 05:31 PM
  #6  
Now with more 1st Gen!

 
autocrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by rico05
Supra's are gross, heavy, poor handling cars IMO.

I second that!!
Old 06-28-02, 05:47 PM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
silverrotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto, Corporate Canada
Posts: 7,592
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Surprisingly I do see a far share of them In T.O whipping around. I've driven one with great dissapointment. Does not nearly handle as well as an FC.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sip
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
19
09-07-15 03:33 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
21
09-01-15 06:32 PM



Quick Reply: Supras Vs. Rx7's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.