2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

straight pipe = fuel efficiency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #1  
d_rotary_rocket_b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Canada
straight pipe = fuel efficiency

hey just wondering if anyone can tell me how much fuel mileage i should expect to lose by getting rid of the 3 cats and putting on a straight down pipe to a muffler.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 11:07 AM
  #2  
ScrapFC's Avatar
Emerald Triangle for life
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
My GXL's freeway cruise went from 22-24mpg to 24-27mpg when I replaced my exhaust. I don't think you'll lose mileage unless the newfound power and noise have you leaving the throttle on the floor all the time.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #3  
bigturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: co
You should not loose any gas mileage you shoudl actually get better gas mileage. At least thats what I have noticed on every car I have owned. especially if you drive ont he highway a lot.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 12:01 PM
  #4  
patman's Avatar
Resident Know-it-All
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 4
From: Richland, WA
getting rid of stock exhaust is worth 2-4 mpg depending on driving style

pat
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 12:25 PM
  #5  
Whizbang's Avatar
Respecognize!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 72
From: Anchor Bay, CA
thanks me having a TII i should loss some for the compensation needed for the boost increase....damn turbo
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #6  
slpin's Avatar
7th Heaven
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 4
From: California
Originally Posted by patman
getting rid of stock exhaust is worth 2-4 mpg depending on driving style

pat
hit the nail square in the head... exactly what i gained
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #7  
therotaryrocket's Avatar
PIMP
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC
Question

Originally Posted by Low Impedance
thanks me having a TII i should loss some for the compensation needed for the boost increase....damn turbo
what? this measurements of gas milage seems to be at cruise and out of the boost. hold on, what?

Last edited by therotaryrocket; Mar 1, 2005 at 04:05 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #8  
totallimmortal's Avatar
Is that thing Turbo?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
i think he might be saying that percent wise the increase in gas mileage on a turbo car might not be as much since adding a free flowing exhuast increases boost and uses more fuel, and boost should be considered cause most people with a turbo car put it in boost at least a little each time they drive it, i mean how couldn't you?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 05:23 PM
  #9  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
A straight pipe on a turbo also means you'll prob need to put in more fuel to avoid detonation, therefore reducing milage.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 05:34 PM
  #10  
RylAssassin's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Boston
I get 19mpg city with a straight pipe and mods. Its supposed to help gas milage due to the fact your getting rid of a restriction.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 05:34 PM
  #11  
ra ra rotory's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: "You take my car, I take your knee caps"
Mine stayed about the same when I put on my exhuast.. But only becuase I reved out the car more often.. Revvv Revvv Pow!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #12  
totallimmortal's Avatar
Is that thing Turbo?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Yes your getting rid of a restriction which means more boost and more boost equals more fuel and more power. If you just lost the restriction and didn't use more fuel you'd be in trouble running that lean. With that said i'm still think it would offer better fuel economy with unrestriced exhuast that without but just not quite the increase one may see on a non turbo car
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #13  
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 3
From: Coldspring TX
My mileage has always been between 25-27 mpg with 3 different exhaust setups, the latest being an open system, so I'm in the "not much change" group...

Outside air temps affect my mileage more than anything else, believe it or not...

The car is only driven back & forth to work, 100 miles round trip, so I can get pretty exacting sampling numbers for mileage...Case in point- the last fillup, 11.584 gallons, at 300.8 miles, netted 25.9 mpg...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 08:33 PM
  #14  
totallimmortal's Avatar
Is that thing Turbo?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
^ thats good mileage i hope to get that much once my safc is tuned and i'm not running so rich
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #15  
patman's Avatar
Resident Know-it-All
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 4
From: Richland, WA
i wish i got 20 mpg...or hell...even a steady 16 or 17 would be ok...****** big turbo..
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #16  
DannyD's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Southern California, High Desert
you never get good gas milage in boost, you get good gas milage staying out of boost, like during cruising and closed loop.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.