Stock Airbox - Autospeed test
#1
Haven't we ALL heard this
Thread Starter
Stock Airbox - Autospeed test
Worst of the test group! Almost the worst even without it's air filter.
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_0073/article.html
James
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_0073/article.html
James
#4
Why am I here ?
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It may not flow well but it is at least a cold air intake ... Replacing it with a cone without proper sealing/ducting to the outside is ... not the best idea.
Hugues -
Hugues -
#6
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Um, no it's talking about an FC airbox...look at the picture. FD's do not have the same looking box as FC's and the pictured box is definitely for an FC. I'm not sure why this is such a surprise as people have been seeing a load more boost on a TII simply by taking out the stock airbox and using a simple TID. Conversely, people without ample fuel/boost control often use the stock airbox in effort to keep boost down and save their motors.
#7
Originally posted by jon88se
Um, no it's talking about an FC airbox...look at the picture. FD's do not have the same looking box as FC's and the pictured box is definitely for an FC. I'm not sure why this is such a surprise as people have been seeing a load more boost on a TII simply by taking out the stock airbox and using a simple TID. Conversely, people without ample fuel/boost control often use the stock airbox in effort to keep boost down and save their motors.
Um, no it's talking about an FC airbox...look at the picture. FD's do not have the same looking box as FC's and the pictured box is definitely for an FC. I'm not sure why this is such a surprise as people have been seeing a load more boost on a TII simply by taking out the stock airbox and using a simple TID. Conversely, people without ample fuel/boost control often use the stock airbox in effort to keep boost down and save their motors.
"Mazda 1992-1997 RX7 Turbo"
Its written right above the few paragraphs that describe the airbox.
-Joe
PS...and yes I do agree that looks like an FC airbox. However, according to them, the results came from an FD airbox.
-Joe
Trending Topics
#11
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't expect big gains at ALL on an NA as it seems to be more a mod that frees up space under the hood as opposed to power. If your car is a TII, be aware that with an exhaust you will hit fuel cut which can damage your motor. There are some expenses that come along with an exhaust and intake on a TII and at the very least they are:
-fuel cut defenser
-upgraded fuel pump
-ported wastegate
A fuel controller on this setup is ideal (think SAFC).
-fuel cut defenser
-upgraded fuel pump
-ported wastegate
A fuel controller on this setup is ideal (think SAFC).
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm
Not very much information there! I'm not disputing the findings and I agree with the earlier post that says:
A cone filter hanging in the hot engine compartment is a poor substitute!
I don't know if anybody has tried to manufacture a replacement top to the stock box that adds a short route to the cold air OR a CAI that uses something other then a cone filter?
It shouldn't be hard to incorporate these specs! Does a cone filter even have this much filter area? The stock one is very generous in size
It may not flow well but it is at least a cold air intake ... Replacing it with a cone without proper sealing/ducting to the outside is ... not the best idea.
I don't know if anybody has tried to manufacture a replacement top to the stock box that adds a short route to the cold air OR a CAI that uses something other then a cone filter?
It shouldn't be hard to incorporate these specs! Does a cone filter even have this much filter area? The stock one is very generous in size
WHAT TO LOOK FOR!
If you don't live in Australia, recommending the Holden and Falcon boxes won't be much good to you. However, the extensive flow testing that we performed taught us what to look out for:
A filter area at least 350 - 400 square cm;
An outlet duct well integrated into the lid - no steps, flanges or bolted-on bellmouths, just a gentle sweep of the lid contours leading into the exit duct;
The largest-possible intake area (two intakes, if possible);
An outlet duct at least 75mm in diameter;
A large diameter, smooth-interior intake snorkel lacking steps and sudden changes of direction.
If you pick a box with these characteristics, you can be fairly confident that it will flow very well
If you don't live in Australia, recommending the Holden and Falcon boxes won't be much good to you. However, the extensive flow testing that we performed taught us what to look out for:
A filter area at least 350 - 400 square cm;
An outlet duct well integrated into the lid - no steps, flanges or bolted-on bellmouths, just a gentle sweep of the lid contours leading into the exit duct;
The largest-possible intake area (two intakes, if possible);
An outlet duct at least 75mm in diameter;
A large diameter, smooth-interior intake snorkel lacking steps and sudden changes of direction.
If you pick a box with these characteristics, you can be fairly confident that it will flow very well
Last edited by asherwood; 06-07-04 at 12:18 PM.
#13
Hmmm, upon reading it further, it's funny how they talk about expensive filters...
You can either buy a cheapo filter at an autoparts store for about 11 bucks, or buy a K&N permanent replacement for about $50 and never replace it again. I'm wondering where they buy their **** at.
You can either buy a cheapo filter at an autoparts store for about 11 bucks, or buy a K&N permanent replacement for about $50 and never replace it again. I'm wondering where they buy their **** at.
#14
Green Flameless
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What i was thinking of doing: I have a donor 92 Eclipse that I need to find time to get to the boneyard, however, it has a nice cone air box (Stock), with a K&N air filter (newish). i was thinking of modding that, so that the airbox and filter were in the same general location, and then fabbing a snorkel out of fiberglass or something to go straight down, and open with a inlet mouth undeneath the belly pan (pointing foward, obviously). Think that this would work well?
#15
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by OverDriven
Did you read the article? This is directly from the article:
"Mazda 1992-1997 RX7 Turbo"
Its written right above the few paragraphs that describe the airbox.
Did you read the article? This is directly from the article:
"Mazda 1992-1997 RX7 Turbo"
Its written right above the few paragraphs that describe the airbox.
"A large flat box, the Mazda unit is 360 x 330 x 230mm. It uses a filter with an area of 500 square cm. The top-mounted inlet air duct is 110 x 40mm and is divided into two by a vertical separator panel. The outlet duct is 70mm in diameter and draws air from a recess below the main box body. No less than eight bolts are used to hold the box together. "
And AutoSpeed take all their own photos. They took a photo of the airbox they tested, which again is obviously an FC one.
Originally posted by JKM
Hmmm, upon reading it further, it's funny how they talk about expensive filters...
You can either buy a cheapo filter at an autoparts store for about 11 bucks, or buy a K&N permanent replacement for about $50 and never replace it again. I'm wondering where they buy their **** at.
Hmmm, upon reading it further, it's funny how they talk about expensive filters...
You can either buy a cheapo filter at an autoparts store for about 11 bucks, or buy a K&N permanent replacement for about $50 and never replace it again. I'm wondering where they buy their **** at.
Originally posted by WonkoTheSane
I have a donor 92 Eclipse that I need to find time to get to the boneyard, however, it has a nice cone air box (Stock), with a K&N air filter (newish). i was thinking of modding that, so that the airbox and filter were in the same general location, and then fabbing a snorkel out of fiberglass or something to go straight down, and open with a inlet mouth undeneath the belly pan (pointing foward, obviously). Think that this would work well?
I have a donor 92 Eclipse that I need to find time to get to the boneyard, however, it has a nice cone air box (Stock), with a K&N air filter (newish). i was thinking of modding that, so that the airbox and filter were in the same general location, and then fabbing a snorkel out of fiberglass or something to go straight down, and open with a inlet mouth undeneath the belly pan (pointing foward, obviously). Think that this would work well?
#17
Nothin But a G Thang
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it seems that the stock air box for fc's flows pretty well without a filter compared with the rest of them, does that mean a k&n filter would be a good idea or is it best just to use a cone filter with some sort of way for it to get fresh air? its hard for me to tell as ive done it both ways with two of my fc's. i modded the top of the stock airbox with a k&n on my s4 and went cone filter on my s5 with some plumbing for fresh air to reach the filter but i cannot say which one is best. they both seemed to do their job well.
#19
Lives on the Forum
Interesting question: Why are we comparing the flow rates of a filter box designed for a 1.3 liter engine to the flow rates of one designed for a V-8??? Four times the displacement should have a box that flows four times the air, after all...
#20
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Actually a rotary flows like a piston engine of nearly twice the displacement, about 2.5L for a 13B.
TriangleMan and Wayne, I think you've missed the point of the article. It was so people who have no airbox (i.e. converting from carb) or who want to upgrade thier airbox to a better one have some comparison figures to use when deciding which one to use. It's not about comparing rotary to V8.
Besides, you can't just assume that an airbox from a V8 will flow twice as well as one a one from a rotary, and the tests prove they don't. As I mentioned, airbox shape has as much to do with packaging as engine airflow, and a V8-powered sedan is going to have much more room for an airbox than a small sports car.
TriangleMan and Wayne, I think you've missed the point of the article. It was so people who have no airbox (i.e. converting from carb) or who want to upgrade thier airbox to a better one have some comparison figures to use when deciding which one to use. It's not about comparing rotary to V8.
Besides, you can't just assume that an airbox from a V8 will flow twice as well as one a one from a rotary, and the tests prove they don't. As I mentioned, airbox shape has as much to do with packaging as engine airflow, and a V8-powered sedan is going to have much more room for an airbox than a small sports car.
#21
sold--no longer in debt
Originally posted by jon88se
If your car is a TII, be aware that with an exhaust you will hit fuel cut which can damage your motor.
If your car is a TII, be aware that with an exhaust you will hit fuel cut which can damage your motor.
Fuel cut is designed to save your motor, it cannot damage it.
#23
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel cut is an OEM safety measure but it can do damage because it is, more or less, a momentary lean condition. You can NOT simply slap on an intake/turbo back exhaust on a TII and expect the fuel cut in the ECU to save you. Keep boosting around and hitting the cut and I guarantee you'll grenade your motor.
#24
sold--no longer in debt
It does not create a lean condition, it cuts all fuel... your motor needs fuel to combust. With no fuel, there is no combustion, therefore no lean condition.
#25
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
What he said. The ECU does not reduce the amount of fuel injected into the rear rotor, it simply stops injecting it at all. You can't have combustion without fuel, and you can't have detonation either.