2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Standalone owners and tuners: Who here gets 30+mpg.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 03:59 PM
  #1  
Turblown's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Standalone owners and tuners: Who here gets 30+mpg.

http://www.teamfc3s.org/forum/showth...1&pagenumber=2

Some people have a hard time believing is possible to get 30+ mpg out of a 13B with a standalone.
So who else here has done?
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:05 PM
  #2  
ScrapFC's Avatar
Emerald Triangle for life
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
I don't see why you couldn't get 30MPG. My 86GXL gets 26MPG with the mods in my sig and the crappy S4 ECU.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:05 PM
  #3  
BDoty311's Avatar
88 AE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
From: N/A
I have a standalone, and I get 16mpg on average.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #4  
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 3
From: Coldspring TX
I'm getting 28 to 28.25 mpg, stock ECU, which definetly doesn't make the cost of a standalone worthwhile

Even with an SAFC, you're talking mostly highway mileage to hit 30...And during cruise, the standalone can't schedule fuel any better than the stock ECU, which is in closed loop at that point...
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #5  
zjbarra's Avatar
Rotodeus
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, OR
I think I found your problem as far as gas milage goes Bdoty:
"1988 10th AE

Powertrain: Jspec motor, mild streetport, TO4S 60-1, Spearco FMIC, Fluidyne radiator, Haltech E6K, Tial 46mm wastegate, ACT 6-puck clutch, 720s and 1600s.

Suspension: Tokico adj. shocks, Eibach springs, 17" Konig Imagines.

408rwhp, daily driven "
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:29 PM
  #6  
BDoty311's Avatar
88 AE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
From: N/A
Hehe, ya that might do it. Gas mileage is directly related to how often I am in boost, which is sometimes a lot.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #7  
FDreaming's Avatar
S4 now S6 soon...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Bonney lake, WA
Grrrr... threads like this make me angry at my car. 86' GXl RB header, Pres-silence, cat-back, KnN adaptor, S-AFC that's all the engine mods I have I'm even still on stock sized rims and tires and I'm getting 20mpg on all freeway mileage, that's with the S-AFC tuned down in the cruising range.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:43 PM
  #8  
Rob XX 7's Avatar
FC guy
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,713
Likes: 17
From: Long Island, New York
maybe your speedo is off
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #9  
powrdby13B's Avatar
i'll blow YOUR valve off
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: KC MF MO
a stock rx7 makes 17/24 MPG. just ask the window sticker (i think thats right...). HOW THE **** do you get 30??? I wanna do that to mine LoL... do you like keep it below 2k rpms or somethin? LoL... thats what my dad does with his jeep...
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 04:49 PM
  #10  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
I get 31mpg on my '89 GTUs at 75-80mph on the highway, stock ECU.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 05:04 PM
  #11  
powrdby13B's Avatar
i'll blow YOUR valve off
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: KC MF MO
what mods do you guys have that allows you to do this? in a completely stock GXL i never got even close to that...
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 05:08 PM
  #12  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Free flowing exhaust, cai, upgraded plug wires, platinum plugs, new fuel filter, timings about 10 degrees advanced, and lightened a bit.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #13  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
Freeing up the exhaust helps MPG a lot. My NA used to get 26mpg freeway w/ the only mods being a racepipe and weight reduction (2400lbs).

ScrapFC says he also gets 26mpg. He has header and freeflow cat in his heavier GXL.

Most NAs don't ever get stand alones, but it will help mileage.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 05:47 PM
  #14  
Turblown's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
And people wonder why its called the kiddie forum over there, LOL!
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #15  
Terrh's Avatar
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
I get as high as 32mpg highway.. stock ecu, 55mph, s-afc leaned out 25% at 2000RPM, free exhaust and intake.

I also get as bad as 8MPG town.. due mostly to a heavy foot.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 08:14 PM
  #16  
FDreaming's Avatar
S4 now S6 soon...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Bonney lake, WA
Your down 25% at cruise? alright, that's it I'm getting a wideband. I'm gonna take out all the fuel I can on the low-throttle map.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 08:49 PM
  #17  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
Yeah, if you don't have cats to worry about overheating you can lean it WAY OUT at cruise.

You will feel the car surging if you get it too lean- this puts extra wear on the drivetrain so richen it up to eliminate lean surge.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #18  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
I usually average about 24mpg on the freeway, but when I factor in the fact I have large tires it goes up to about 25mpg. I could do some more weight reduction to get that number to go higher, but I don't want to take out that much stuff.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 11:51 PM
  #19  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
what kind of AFR's can you lean out to during cruise? i always figured you could go pretty lean since its at such a low rpm (maye 14.5-16) but how lean can you take it during cruise/
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 12:08 AM
  #20  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
I get 16, 17 if I'm lucky.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 12:27 AM
  #21  
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 3
From: Coldspring TX
I've noticed during my "mini-hesitation" problems that she'll run so lean the O2 sensor voltage drops to about .1v, so, however that translates into AF ratios, that's a little more leaner than you could run normally. In my case the FPR is screwed...

Surprisingly, I haven't noticed any better gas mileage running with her screwed up like that...This is in cruise, closed loop, BTW...
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 03:21 AM
  #22  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by WAYNE88N/A
...during cruise, the standalone can't schedule fuel any better than the stock ECU, which is in closed loop at that point...
Not necessarily true. Closed-loop is a configurable option on programmable ECU's, so if you can leave it off and tune for mixtures leaner than stoichiometric during cruise. Stoichiometric is good for emissions but not necessarily economy.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 04:46 AM
  #23  
ScrapFC's Avatar
Emerald Triangle for life
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by WAYNE88N/A
...And during cruise, the standalone can't schedule fuel any better than the stock ECU, which is in closed loop at that point...
It is true that the stock ECU is in closed-loop during cruise, but that doesn't mean it's accurate. The S4 ECU is an 8-bit system with the same processing power as a TI-82 scientific calculator. A modern system should easily beat it in both resolution and sampling rate, making it much more accurate and thus more efficient.
Also, by going to a standalone, you should be able to do away with the fairly restrictive stock MAF sensor and switch to a speed-density measurement using a MAP sensor in the dynamic chamber. Removing restriction in the intake is just as useful as removing it in the exhaust, since the engine doesn't need to burn as much fuel to create the energy it uses to move air in and out. Extra HP is just a happy side-effect of being able to move more air more easily.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 04:54 AM
  #24  
HIMNI Racing's Avatar
Rick James
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Under The Hood In FL
I have a standalone and my mpg suck! I won't do the math though...if I do I might come to my senses

My mpg is better then when I ran the stock ecu and less mods.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 08:34 AM
  #25  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by ScrapFC
It is true that the stock ECU is in closed-loop during cruise, but that doesn't mean it's accurate. The S4 ECU is an 8-bit system with the same processing power as a TI-82 scientific calculator. A modern system should easily beat it in both resolution and sampling rate, making it much more accurate and thus more efficient.
Also, by going to a standalone, you should be able to do away with the fairly restrictive stock MAF sensor and switch to a speed-density measurement using a MAP sensor in the dynamic chamber. Removing restriction in the intake is just as useful as removing it in the exhaust, since the engine doesn't need to burn as much fuel to create the energy it uses to move air in and out. Extra HP is just a happy side-effect of being able to move more air more easily.
The AFM is hardly a restriction until you get into much higher than stock power levels. Supposedly the s5 ECU had a more powerful processor, bonus good news for the s5 owners.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.