2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Standalone or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-04, 09:24 PM
  #1  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Standalone or no?

Allright.. I'm not sure what I should do here...

The following parts are going on my car:

downpipe (3") midpipe (?") catback (2.5" to 2" dual)
I want to do something intakewise, not sure 100% what yet

MORE BOOST probably 12PSI
water injection - fmic's are evil
680cc secondaries, maybe bigger..

I've been thinking alot about getting a megasquirt ECU and a dizzy to run it all...

but would it be reasonable to do it on a stock ECU and an SAFC? or would the standalone be the better course of action?
Old 03-06-04, 12:40 AM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
silverrotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto, Corporate Canada
Posts: 7,592
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It's a totally different animal going with a standalone EMS. You will have full adjustability of everything which Is unparrell with a S-AFC.

Why mess around with 13yr old technology and tinker with a S-AFC? Mind you, I'm not knocking anyone whom does this, but It just seems to me that It Is a great addition to suggest this, considering your actual thinking about to go with the standalone EMS and knowing all It's Implications that encompass It, respectively. It's what I did.
Old 03-06-04, 01:19 AM
  #3  
stop stealing my avatar

 
Mark'sMazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canton MI
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMO, you should go with an ems if you plan on running more than 12psi. The stock ECU only has timing maps for up to 8psi. 8psi maps are very agressive at 12+psi.

I know many people run safc, and high boost with out blowing up. However, if a standalone saves your motor just once, it just paid for it's self
Old 03-06-04, 02:03 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
YakATK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go standalone. Full ability to tune your car completely according to your setup = priceless!
Old 03-06-04, 06:48 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
LT8TurboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go stand alone if you:

#1 Can, or have someone local who is willing to tune you car.

#2 If you do not have someone local familiar with they system you purchase, are willing to travel to have the car tuned.

Latley there are alot of people (esp since the MT craze here in the US) that are getting standalones and getting in over their heads pretty fast. Just be careful, and make sure you are ready for that step.
Old 03-06-04, 12:10 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (7)
 
sub9lulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 2,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
why not if you have extra 1-2k to stuff in your car
i know i want one
Old 03-06-04, 03:12 PM
  #7  
Is that thing Turbo?

 
totallimmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you can afford a stand alone get it, i think money is the only thing that should keep anyone from gettin one, it pretty much garuntees a good hp gain if its tuned by a pro
Old 03-06-04, 07:08 PM
  #8  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
White_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Standalone or no?

Originally posted by Terrh
....water injection - fmic's are evil
I'd love to know what the hell you have against FMIC's?!


Definatly go with a standalone though, personally i'd urge you to get a more readily tunable one, such as a microtech. Not too many dyno places would know how to tune a megasquirt just yet..

Thats just my humble little opinion though.
Old 03-06-04, 07:36 PM
  #9  
seven-less

 
Sir Rupert Hobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: city of houston.... y0!
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
White_FC, why do you always think your answer might not be right? just admit it.. you know your ****...


anywho.. i am having a tough time finding a good dyno tuner around here that knows what they're doing when it comes to MT.

if you have the money, then do it. Lord knows i would.
Old 03-10-04, 08:55 PM
  #10  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
bump...

I was thinking about this more and I'm STILL iffy on the idea.. I really think that a megasquirt sounds like a great idea, but if I can get the stock EMS to work 100% right and do the job, then why not just use it?

also.. I wanted to stay away from the FMIC but I found a way to mount it without cutting the car in any way shape or form, so that's what I'm going to do...

12PSI = limit for stock turbo, right?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SRTx781
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
12-19-15 07:30 PM



Quick Reply: Standalone or no?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.