2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

single or dual exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 01:42 AM
  #26  
Delphince's Avatar
Rider of the Sky
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 228
Likes: 1
From: Corvallis, OR
Originally Posted by ramz28
i think its 1/100 off your 1/4 mile time for evey 100lbs of weight lost
I hope that was a joke; even if so, it's so far off it's not even funny. Stripping your car down to an improbable 500 lbs would do a little more than take off 1/4 of a second from your quarter mile time.

Gain from effect on a % for % scale, no modification is more effective than weight reduction. Cutting your weight in half is far more effective overall than doubling your horsepower. But arguing over 20 or 30 lbs when your car is still well over a ton is like a heated debate about the effects of putting on a cold-air intake on an otherwise stock engine.

...Especially when many drivers aren't exactly the trim athlete themselves. The driver is part of the car, after all.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 02:12 AM
  #27  
tandolla's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Everett, WA
every 100lbs is a tenth of a second.. for 40 pounds wont do much.. basicly its up to you.. i wanted dual really bad.. but i onyl have money for a single so i went single havnt recieved my exhaust yet but everyone that has the exhaut that i got loves it.. go to www.ssautochrome.com $385.00 shippeed to my house.. cheap and great..

*EDIT*

It turbo back..
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #28  
Rxseven7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: mass
waht dose everyone thing of the dual hks system and pictures if anyone has any
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 02:07 AM
  #29  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Sharado
Weight makes a huge difference
be it just 10 lbs or even 5 lbs
so I would definitely go for single, which I have on my car

PS: if you think 5 extra pound is a non-issue, you are no racer.


Do you realise how much your car weighs? A dual-muffler system adds ~20lb compared to a similarly built single-muffler system. Do you understand what a tiny percentage difference that makes to the car's total weight? Even on the lightest FC it's well under 1%. Do you honestly think you can tell the difference? You add 80-100lb to the car just from filling up with gas. Or do you add fuel in 1gal lots (~6lb each)?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 04:48 AM
  #30  
sleeepyhead's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: bay area
I had a stock rx7 and raced my friend's rx7 and we were even, strong engines and bone stock. I started to lighten my car gradually over the year and didnt notice a difference. Spare and jack, rear interior, aluminum hood, battery, seat, all done at seperate times. I thought i was gonna beat my buddy by 1/2 a car or so cause i didnt really feel a change. When we raced again, i easily won, i pulled almost 2 cars on him by the end of second gear. I had a corksport single too and didnt feel a thing other than the ringing in my ears, I currently have a stock catback after i welded a extra muffler on the corksport which rubbed the ground and eventually broke off....

My friend did a little experiment and stripped his car bare bones, not even a dash, he zip tied his guages to the firewall. He has a streetport(ghetto 1st time try with no runner work at all) and true dual exhaust for power mods, stock intake. He destroys 350zs and s2ks and lost to an evo by about a car length. He is now addicted to lightening

Bottom line is if you want to go faster, single is obviously better even if you might not notice the difference
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #31  
Rxseven7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: mass
or if you want the dual just get it and if the 15lb makes that much of a diffrence to you then jsut take the weight off somewere else.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 10:42 AM
  #32  
drft_180sx's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: NYC/Stony Brook Univ.
Ummm....i do agree with the general consensus that 15-30 lbs won't make a difference especially for a car that probably wont see any further weight reductions.

BUT...you can't possibly tell me that a full tank to a 1/4 tank-fueled car doesnt make a difference? I only fill up to 1/4 tank (cause i got no moneys) and if i ever fill the tank the car feels like a pig.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 10:29 PM
  #33  
FCKing1995's Avatar
Rotary Slave
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, Alabama
I dont see the deal here.

Single:
Slightly lighter
Slightly less restriction

Duel:
Slightly more restrictive
Slightly heavier

But Duel looks much nicer and cleaner to me. Its all up to personal taste cause performance and weight isnt enough of an issue to bitch about, when we are speaking in such small amounts (1-2hp and 10-20 pounds)
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 10:29 PM
  #34  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
driving around in my corksport it wasnt too loud cus you got used to it. after i stopped and drove my new fc, and finally starting my old one back up i must say, its loud as ****. really really fucken loud. of course i must say that i had a completly uncorked exhaust. anyways. a true dual setup from mazda trix is a nice investment. its quiet, and it will be pretty quiet. its much quieter than the uncorked corksport, yet it will still produce AROUND the same hp that mine did. plus weight should not be a factor for a daily driven car. unless you compete heavilly in competitions, weight isnt an issue. now if you have a friend in your car and hes 300 lbs, kick that ****** out.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 10:32 PM
  #35  
FCKing1995's Avatar
Rotary Slave
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, Alabama
Something that pisses me off a bit is people that talk about weight savings and make a big deal of it... then you look in the back of their car and they have a bunch of subs and amps and whatnot... WHAT THE HELL IS THE POINT of saving weight when you have 75-100 pounds of audio equip. in the back of your damn car Just an observation
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 10:37 PM
  #36  
Valkyrie's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 167
From: Japanabama
It's so you still weight slightly less than you started out with, I would imagine :p

Personally I like single-exit exhausts (as long as they aren't too ginourmous), but that's just me. I like the asymmetry.

What I find more amuzing is when people spend 500 bucks on a carbon fiber hood when they haven't even so much as bought new tires, suspension, or rims... especially when they have hood pins (and almost certainly the stock latch as well).
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2006 | 10:39 PM
  #37  
papiogxl's Avatar
What's the point??
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Disclaimer: This post contains liberal amounts of sarcasm.

If you are THAT obsessed with weight redux, cut a hole in your fender and route a custom exhaust. It'll weigh less than the stock mani, not to mention all the massive amounts of sheet metal removed by cutting the hole.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #38  
Rotary Noob's Avatar
Ooooooh, custom.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Corona, CA
Originally Posted by Sharado
Weight makes a huge difference
be it just 10 lbs or even 5 lbs
so I would definitely go for single, which I have on my car

PS: if you think 5 extra pound is a non-issue, you are no racer.

Yes, 5 pounds can make a difference, but only if youve already got it gutted, tuned, proper suspension, and remember, you still have to be at the proper weight, you might even have to add balast for races!

Tool.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 02:46 AM
  #39  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
I like my borla duals, **** single tips, no good reason to even bother, most aftermarket duals are featherweight compared to the stock system anyways, and if you wanna remove exhaust weight, ditch everything stock, RB or corksport header, presilencer, stainless dual catback, deep and free flowing without sounding like a folgers can. Dual mufflers give you the option of being mellow when you need your hearing or wanna actually use your bling stereo to pick up chicks since your single, as MadRX7Racer has successfully concluded through deductive reasoning.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 03:12 AM
  #40  
EJayCe996's Avatar
There were no survivors
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,475
Likes: 1
From: Grand Prairie, Texas
Originally Posted by FCKing1995

Single:
Slightly lighter
Slightly less restriction

Duel:
Slightly more restrictive
Slightly heavier
Proof please.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 03:45 AM
  #41  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by FCKing1995
Single:
Slightly less restriction

Duel:
Slightly more restrictive
Like I already said, there are many other more important variables other than single or dual that determine how well an exhaust flows. You simply can't make blanket statements like that.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 04:31 AM
  #42  
Cosmo_TT's Avatar
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 1
From: cali
Originally Posted by ramz28
i think its 1/100 off your 1/4 mile time for evey 100lbs of weight lost, but even up 2 50lbs on street car makes nuthing change. this car drives so nice you dont evne know its there, theis cars gonna get a dual exhaust and hopesfully true dual, looking at racing beat road race system will check out corkport 2

so you are telling me that if you had a car that could fit four of your friends who weigh about 200lbs each you would not run slower than .1 difference than if you ran a 1/4 mile by yourself with the car empty hahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahha dude please dont post on here if you have no clue as to what the hell you are talking about i am so sick of people who type stuff on here and have no clue or experience with cars/racing/or anything that has to do with this forum
wow i think i have a headache now
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #43  
stevenx788's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: st. petersburg florida
i have duals and nothing beats the sound also i havent owned single exuast because why leave the other exaust slot empty...lol
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #44  
Madrx7racer's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
it really looks weird...........I know there are several rear skirts that have the inserts to cover up the other opening but still not worth it unless you've already gutted and race-prepped your car and are looking to decrease the most amount of weight possible.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #45  
FCKing1995's Avatar
Rotary Slave
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, Alabama
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Like I already said, there are many other more important variables other than single or dual that determine how well an exhaust flows. You simply can't make blanket statements like that.
yeah i should have been more clear. i was speaking on the terms of having a 3'' stright through exhuast with single muffler (Corksport) vs something like RB kit with presilencers and y pipe, then 2 mufflers. The ehxuast gas has to split and move around a bit more. In general they are about the same, but again Im speaking such low numbers you wouldnt hardly be able to see them on a dyno
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #46  
13BT_RX3's Avatar
The General RE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 924
Likes: 13
From: San Diego, CA
If you were to compare a single 3.5"with a magna flow and a dual 2.5" system with two magna flows. These sizes would have nearly the same flow area.

The dual system would cost more, be quieter, fit better, look more balanced and have better ground clearance.

The single system would have less internal turbulance and friction, but I don't know if you would see much of a gain in power.

Which one is better? That is up to the individual. I like dual. Single gives a second gen the looks of a v6 mustang. An empty spot on one side.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #47  
86TwinTurbo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach
The racing beat true dual outperforms the "Dual exhaust" which I believe is less restrictive than a single exhaust...I have compared the true dual and i think an hks version and the true dual gave more power. Also if you do go single....please..i repeat get a rear bumper that is made for a single....I laugh at 7's racing around with one muffler and a gaping hole on the otherside
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #48  
Valkyrie's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 167
From: Japanabama
For the record, a 30-pound loss (if you took off one of my mufflers it would probably be closer to 40 pounds... for a Magnaflow and some bottlenecked piping) makes a much bigger difference on a car with a stock-ish engine versus one with say, 400 HP...

Sort of how a golf car with no one on it would be pretty damn fast, reasonably fast with one, and slow as hell with 4. Or why even a racing go cart will be different with a 130 pound driver versus one that weighs 180 (that's why they're in different classes)... or why someone who weighs 200 pounds wouldn't be very satisfied on a 250 CC motorcycle, but someone who weighs maybe 170 would have the time of their life (...well, maybe not on a 250).

Obviously the difference between any of these things an a car is a bit different, but if you were compare a 160-HP torqueless NA to a turbo with 300 ft-lbs of torque, those 20-30 pounds (combined with say, 20 pounds from taking off the A/C, 18 or so from the PS, etc) have very different meanings to different people.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #49  
SASSER's Avatar
Calm like a bomb
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, GA
Originally Posted by Rxseven7
or if you want the dual just get it and if the 15lb makes that much of a diffrence to you then jsut take the weight off somewere else.
Agreed, like maybe loosing the extra pounds. Oprah's Weight Loss Plan!
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 04:10 AM
  #50  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by FCKing1995
i was speaking on the terms of having a 3'' stright through exhuast with single muffler (Corksport) vs something like RB kit with presilencers and y pipe, then 2 mufflers.
So you're actually comparing two completely different systems. Like I've already said twice, there are many other variables to consider and the many differences between your two examples prove that. I also don't think you realize that two mufflers in parallel aren't necessarily more restrictive than a single. It depends entirely on the size of the pipes. My dual system has 70mm rear pipes and mufflers. Two 70mm pipes will flow ~35% more than a single 80mm pipe at the same pressure. That's a huge reduction in restriction. A well-built Y will only have a minor effect on flow in comparison.

The ehxuast gas has to split and move around a bit more.
There is no reason a dual system can't be built as a mirror image of a single system, so there's no need forany more "moving around". The only difference would be the Y, which isn't an issue if the pipes are sized correctly.

Originally Posted by Valkyrie
For the record, a 30-pound loss (if you took off one of my mufflers it would probably be closer to 40 pounds... for a Magnaflow and some bottlenecked piping) makes a much bigger difference on a car with a stock-ish engine versus one with say, 400 HP...
For starters, if you’re comparing similarly constructed systems it's not 40lb, it's only about 20. You're not just taking off one muffler; you're replacing two mufflers with one bigger one. Unless you plan to strangle your engine with an undersized single system, some of the weight lost from not having two mufflers is offset by the increased size of the single muffler. As for power difference, we're still talking about such a tiny percentage of the car's total weight that this is largely irrelevant.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
LunchboxCritter
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
15
Jan 3, 2016 04:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.