2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Should I set the Haltechs rev limiter to fuel or ign cut? Anyone have diagrams also?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-05, 02:50 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
MountainTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Utah (land of mountains)
Posts: 515
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should I set the Haltechs rev limiter to fuel or ign cut? Anyone have diagrams also?

So 2 questions.

First, all the maps I've downloaded so far to look at for my E6K that other people have used have had fuel cut at the rev limit. This really worries me, I'd much rather have ign cut, but does it matter? Is there one that's better than the other?

Second, anyone have the wiring diagrams for an E6K? I need to know colors and such to hook up my O2 sensor and a few other odds and ends.

Thanks!
Old 10-07-05, 03:19 PM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
turbine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: seattle wa
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would use ignition cut i feel it is safer on a boosted car
Old 10-07-05, 03:32 PM
  #3  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Fuel cut is safe on a turbo car if it CUTS ALL FUEL and not just some. The main problem with the Mazda fuel cut is that it only cuts SOME fuel. But I do agree that ignition cut is far better then fuel cut, so use it anyway.
Old 10-07-05, 05:07 PM
  #4  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,217
Received 764 Likes on 506 Posts
The reason fuel cut rev-limiters exist is to preserve the catylitic converter.

If you have no cat. set it to ignition cut; if you have a cat use fuel-cut.
Old 10-07-05, 07:18 PM
  #5  
holley guy

 
mwatson184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: K.C. MO
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a hard fuel cut and a soft fuel cut. Hard will cut off all fuel, soft will decrease the amount of fuel until the goal rpm is sustained (soft would be very bad).

-Marques
Old 10-07-05, 08:55 PM
  #6  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Fuel cut is safe on a turbo car if it CUTS ALL FUEL and not just some. The main problem with the Mazda fuel cut is that it only cuts SOME fuel.
That's not quite true. All of the fuel is cut from one rotor, which is perfectly safe and much smoother than cutting fuel entirely.

Originally Posted by mwatson184
There is a hard fuel cut and a soft fuel cut. Hard will cut off all fuel, soft will decrease the amount of fuel until the goal rpm is sustained (soft would be very bad).
Again this is wrong. Soft fuel cut does not remove some fuel, it cuts all fuel from intermittant engine cycles. You either get full injection or none at all.

I've yet to see anyone provide a good reason why ignition cut is a better method than fuel cut.

MountainTurbo, here's the E6K wiring digram:

http://www.haltech.com.au/downloads/E6Kdiagram.pdf

Last edited by NZConvertible; 10-07-05 at 08:57 PM.
Old 10-07-05, 09:24 PM
  #7  
yessir

iTrader: (24)
 
First gen man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sebring FL
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have always though fuel cut was better, because as the ignition is off, fuel is still coming in. So when ignition clicks on again it burns nasty rich for a second, and could foul a plug. thats my two cents...
Old 10-07-05, 11:52 PM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

 
Syonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wouldn't there be a chance of a lean chamber or two with fuel cut? You'll have solid fuel/air, and then a full lean mixture with no gas, but between those two points there will be a gradient, and I'd think there's at least a risk of a chamber getting the right amount of fuel to be in a detonation danger zone.

-=Russ=-
Old 10-08-05, 12:49 AM
  #9  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
There is no gradient, EFI doesn't work that way. The injector is either on or off. The ECU will always fire the full amount of fuel required, or it will fire none at all.

You guys need to give OEM and aftermarket EFI manufacturers more credit. They know this stuff way better than anyone here, and obviously aren't going to design and engine protection system that does more harm than good.
Old 10-08-05, 01:53 AM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Geezuschrist, how many of you have first hand experience with this stuff???
Some of the advice is just downright wrong, so if you don't have direct experience with the Haltech rev systems, I'd suggest you not say anything, period.

The fuel cut is a lot milder than the ignition cut.
The ignition cut is very violent.
Haltech cuts ALL fuel (injectors) when you do hit the fuel cut.

This is why we set all our Haltech installs to use fuel cut instead of ignition cut.

You can play around with this yourself, by dropping the rev limit down really low like 3,000RPM and banging off of it while changing the settings.
If you're revving in neutral with little load on the engine, this minimizes damage to the engine - just don't hold it for several minutes.



-Ted
Old 10-08-05, 08:01 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
MountainTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Utah (land of mountains)
Posts: 515
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys, that's what I needed to know!

And thanks for the link to the wiring diagram, for some reason I couldn't find it when I was searching their site, I was only finding the installation manual. Long day:P

I was going to play with the different cuts as you suggested ted, but since my motor is a 0-mile rebuild I didn't think it would be very good for it right now. Not to mention the fact that I can't get it to go past 2,000rpm lol

Sounds like I'll leave the haltech on fuel cut for now then. I was just worried that it could cause a lean condition, but your explanation makes sense.

Thanks again!
Old 10-08-05, 07:58 PM
  #12  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Oops on the stock fuel cut. I knew it was either a partial cut or one rotor, but was not sure which. I guessed wrong.

As for the Haltech, maybe I'm weird but I like the harshness of the ignition cut vs. the fuel cut. It's a good trainer in my mind to stay away from the rev limiter.
Old 10-09-05, 12:37 AM
  #13  
Adaptronic Distributor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 7,066
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
I saw a turbine melt on a T2, where the driver liked to bang off his ign rev limiter.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
morataya
Microtech
4
08-17-15 01:04 PM



Quick Reply: Should I set the Haltechs rev limiter to fuel or ign cut? Anyone have diagrams also?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.