Is the shifter supposed to feel like this?
#76
Re: Re: not true
Originally posted by AbecX
Thats just stupid, who the hell is going to race a 1.3L Piston pusher?
Thats just stupid, who the hell is going to race a 1.3L Piston pusher?
its not fast (17.x), but its a nice little car, and once we get some cheap turbo kits they'll be something
#77
We come with the Hardcore
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the love of god, I know there's an N/A RX-7 here that's ran faster than a mid-15. Anyone have a track slip? Or will I have to put mine together in a hurry and head down to the local ¼?
#78
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Liquid Anarchy
For the love of god, I know there's an N/A RX-7 here that's ran faster than a mid-15.
For the love of god, I know there's an N/A RX-7 here that's ran faster than a mid-15.
#79
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is such a stupid thread. I hate to say it but both the mustang and NA are turds in stock form. As for comparing models of cars.....If you are comparing the high end V8 mustang against the low end NA seven that's likle comparing a turbo seven against a v6 mustang. They are apples and oranges. You need to try comparing a high end mustang (V8) to a high end RX7 (turbo). In that matchup stock vs. stock the mustang WILL lose. As for you saying "no replacement for displacement" I know for a fact that many of your mustang buddies are getting turbo kits put on their stangs.
This is such a stupid argument. I've seen minivans run 12sec quarter miles but nobody says "Minivans are the fastest thing on the road" Basically, it's all about money and skill, not what nameplate you have on your car!
This is such a stupid argument. I've seen minivans run 12sec quarter miles but nobody says "Minivans are the fastest thing on the road" Basically, it's all about money and skill, not what nameplate you have on your car!
#80
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by turboGXL
[B]This is such a stupid thread. I hate to say it but both the mustang and NA are turds in stock form.
[B]This is such a stupid thread. I hate to say it but both the mustang and NA are turds in stock form.
As for comparing models of cars.....If you are comparing the high end V8 mustang against the low end NA seven that's likle comparing a turbo seven against a v6 mustang. They are apples and oranges. You need to try comparing a high end mustang (V8) to a high end RX7 (turbo).
In that matchup stock vs. stock the mustang WILL lose. As for you saying "no replacement for displacement" I know for a fact that many of your mustang buddies are getting turbo kits put on their stangs.
This is such a stupid argument. I've seen minivans run 12sec quarter miles but nobody says "Minivans are the fastest thing on the road" Basically, it's all about money and skill, not what nameplate you have on your car!
#81
WTB S5 N/A FC
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: College Station, Tx
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
turboGXL...HAHAHAHAHAHA!! That is the first time I have ever read any moron call the N/A a turd in stock form. Man, your stupidity cracks me up!! And any car that costs less than $20k is a turd!?!?! HAHAHAHAAHAHA!! You know so little it blows ones mind!! Have a good one!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!!!!!
#82
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rico05
call the N/A a turd in stock form. Man, your stupidity cracks me up!!
call the N/A a turd in stock form. Man, your stupidity cracks me up!!
And any car that costs less than $20k is a turd!?!?! HAHAHAHAAHAHA!! You know so little it blows ones mind!! Have a good one!!!
#84
Senior Member
Originally posted by AbecX
Exactly, most of the people that have been posting up are talking about how their cars should preform compared to other cars with similar mods they want to do in the future. Lets face facts people, the n/a are slow, and adding a FULL EXHAUST system is not going to add 28% horsepower.
Exactly, most of the people that have been posting up are talking about how their cars should preform compared to other cars with similar mods they want to do in the future. Lets face facts people, the n/a are slow, and adding a FULL EXHAUST system is not going to add 28% horsepower.
This system is the culmination of considerable testing time here at Mazdatrix, using many different designs and pipe sizes. The result is by far the best HP from a bone-stock 86-92 13B non-turbo we have seen. We showed a 28% increase in rear wheel HP on a chassis dyno with this system. Torque is increased greatly from 2000 RPM on up, with the power peaking at 7000 RPM. -Mazdatrix DYNO PROVEN
#85
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rico05
No use takin to you anymore. Mustang mentality....
No use takin to you anymore. Mustang mentality....
#86
Slow and old
Join Date: May 2001
Location: It's a midwest thing.
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rico05
turboGXL...HAHAHAHAHAHA!! That is the first time I have ever read any moron call the N/A a turd in stock form. Man, your stupidity cracks me up!! And any car that costs less than $20k is a turd!?!?! HAHAHAHAAHAHA!! You know so little it blows ones mind!! Have a good one!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!!!!!
turboGXL...HAHAHAHAHAHA!! That is the first time I have ever read any moron call the N/A a turd in stock form. Man, your stupidity cracks me up!! And any car that costs less than $20k is a turd!?!?! HAHAHAHAAHAHA!! You know so little it blows ones mind!! Have a good one!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!!!!!
For the record, I have quite a few friends who own N/As and love them...but they also love it when I let them drive my car. I don't have anything against N/A owners in general...if they are realistic about the cars they own. Don't talk about someone elses fast car and act like yours is the same deal (this goes for all cars). Accept what you have and enjoy what it can do.
#87
WTB S5 N/A FC
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: College Station, Tx
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, you just obviously have the Mustang mentality that "fast" is only in a straight line. Guess what? Mazda never intended to make it a straight line beast. They left that job for low tech American cars with crappy hp/weight numbers and 3000lb+ chassis for that. The FC is a HANDLING car. There are many different definitions of fast. If you want fast in a straight line, yes, you got a Stang. (I am not doggin on them, as a matter of fact, I have wanted a super charged 93 Cobra since I was a kid). Fast around a corner, track, autox course, get a FC.
#89
WTB S5 N/A FC
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: College Station, Tx
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am ******* sick and tired of everyone ******* on N/A. I could care less how fast your car is in a straight line. Whooptie freakin doo, you can drive in a straight line!! Yay!! You can do the most rudimentary of driving skills!! Yay!! You win....a COOKIE!!!
#90
What Subscription?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Aiken SC USA
Posts: 5,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Well, my TII (in stock condition) has better brakes and stiffer suspension than most N/As, so it would shine on road courses as well. Denial isn't healthy, kids"
What about GXL Brakes and suspension??? Same Brakes, Less weight that tII(please correct if i am wrong)
What about GXL Brakes and suspension??? Same Brakes, Less weight that tII(please correct if i am wrong)
#91
WTB S5 N/A FC
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: College Station, Tx
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, considering that the factory numbers show that the GXL runs a faster slolam speed, and pulls more lateral G's on the skid pad than a TII...Hmmm. You're right!! Denial is not a good thing. Lemmie go find the chart for ya!!
#92
Slow and old
Join Date: May 2001
Location: It's a midwest thing.
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by banzaitoyota
"Well, my TII (in stock condition) has better brakes and stiffer suspension than most N/As, so it would shine on road courses as well. Denial isn't healthy, kids"
What about GXL Brakes and suspension??? Same Brakes, Less weight that tII(please correct if i am wrong)
"Well, my TII (in stock condition) has better brakes and stiffer suspension than most N/As, so it would shine on road courses as well. Denial isn't healthy, kids"
What about GXL Brakes and suspension??? Same Brakes, Less weight that tII(please correct if i am wrong)
#93
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rico05
No, you just obviously have the Mustang mentality that "fast" is only in a straight line. Guess what? Mazda never intended to make it a straight line beast. They left that job for low tech American cars with crappy hp/weight numbers and 3000lb+ chassis for that. The FC is a HANDLING car. There are many different definitions of fast. If you want fast in a straight line, yes, you got a Stang. (I am not doggin on them, as a matter of fact, I have wanted a super charged 93 Cobra since I was a kid). Fast around a corner, track, autox course, get a FC.
No, you just obviously have the Mustang mentality that "fast" is only in a straight line. Guess what? Mazda never intended to make it a straight line beast. They left that job for low tech American cars with crappy hp/weight numbers and 3000lb+ chassis for that. The FC is a HANDLING car. There are many different definitions of fast. If you want fast in a straight line, yes, you got a Stang. (I am not doggin on them, as a matter of fact, I have wanted a super charged 93 Cobra since I was a kid). Fast around a corner, track, autox course, get a FC.
blah blah blah. I never said that mazda created them for straight line performance, but some of the people on here are claiming they can beat cars that are made for straight line performance, let alone the 28% more power from exhaust
The first thing I noticed about the rx7 I bought is the size of the brakes compared to the power and weight of the car. I can tell its going to be a stopping monster. I could honestly care less about running around in circles wasting expensive tires, warping rotors and replacing brake pads every other weekend because of the road racing I do. If I wanted to do that, I would buy a car that that comes with 13" Cross Drilled brakes, way more horsepower and a turbo to help pull out of them corners because mostly likely the engine is going to be putting out 220hp @ 6400 rpms to keep the 50/50 weight ratio w/ a small displacement engine.
All I'm saying is N/A motors are slow and your not going to get anything out of them let alone beat cars that are made to kick *** on the street. I'd rather launch w/ a 1.5 60ft and hit the end of the track @ 120 then run 4-5 miles in circles.
#95
Slow and old
Join Date: May 2001
Location: It's a midwest thing.
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rico05
Well, considering that the factory numbers show that the GXL runs a faster slolam speed, and pulls more lateral G's on the skid pad than a TII...Hmmm. You're right!! Denial is not a good thing. Lemmie go find the chart for ya!!
Well, considering that the factory numbers show that the GXL runs a faster slolam speed, and pulls more lateral G's on the skid pad than a TII...Hmmm. You're right!! Denial is not a good thing. Lemmie go find the chart for ya!!
#96
Slow and old
Join Date: May 2001
Location: It's a midwest thing.
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by banzaitoyota
In my area there are more GXL's on the road than se's or TII's. maybe Perhaps the rust belt is different.
In my area there are more GXL's on the road than se's or TII's. maybe Perhaps the rust belt is different.
#97
WTB S5 N/A FC
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: College Station, Tx
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What "kicks ***" on the street? Mustang GTs? Beaten 2 5.0s, 3 SN95s from lights. Trans Ams? Highway raced 2: 96, and a 97. I did not beat, but they got no more than 6-8 feet in front of me. (that their nose in relation to mine). Firebirds? Ha. Easy. Yes, from a stop, no way can I hang with those (I mean TAs that is), cuz the N/A just does not have any torque at all. Yeah, a TII would rock b/c it has the bottom end that the N/A lacks. I will never beleive anyone who says that an N/A is a "turd" or is slow. Sorry I have gotten so defensive, and been quite rude to ya'll, but it just pisses me off when my love is insulted. It's like someone calling your rex a "Rice burner" to your face. I love TII, but my first passion is N/A. On my next N/A, I will be doing a TII swap eventually, but right now, I am enjoying the challenge of N/A.
#99
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rico05, Mustangs are slow, so are lt1 trans am. Like I said before 14's are not anything to write home about. But I bet you $20 the next time you come up here, I'll race you in my wifes stock 1990 coupe and I bet i can pull you by an easy 6 cars before 100mph.