2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

S5 intake swap nearly complete, here's the current status. (pics and vid)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-05, 09:35 PM
  #1  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S5 intake swap nearly complete, here's the current status. (pics and vid)

Well, I finished bolting everything up this afternoon and have just been cleaning a few things and re-routing lines and checking for vac. leaks.

I also dug through the parts bucket and put together a cold air intake system that's much more stable then the old cone intake I had going on (it was held by one little aluminum bracket and some zip ties, very shaky.)

The car runs pretty well and after dinking around with the adjustments I got it to idle stabily. Power is just as good as it was with the S4 intake (the VDI isn't connected yet since I'm waiting to dig up an electric pump and RPM switch.) As soon as the VDI get's setup I'll be set.

Here's how it looks right now:





Here's where the intake goes through and the filter sits. I need to fab a sheet metal under-tray for the radiator so I figure I'll create a shield for the filter at teh same time. The brake duct was all screwed up (someone curbed the front of the car and bent the metal the duct sits on making it worthless) so I pulled it completely. I also need to get a good filter. This one is cheap and pretty worthless.





I haven't driven it long enough to cook the engine bay like usual, but I'm hoping this helps keeping it from bogging after 20 mintues of driving (it starts to noticably dog after extended driving.)



And here's where the BAC is drawing air from. I took the advice of the experts and kept the nipple on the intake.



I'm excited to get the VDI working and then pull soem more parts and clean/paint so the bay looks nice and shiny. The swap wasn't too bad at all. I started yesterday at 2pm and finished all the detail work at ~7pm tonight.

All I needed to get was the S5 UIM, dynamic chamber, and both fuel rails. I don't have any emission equipment so the vacuum routing was cake and only had to grind a small piece from the thorttle body and one from the rear iron for everything to bolt up. Oh, I also had to drill a new hole in the back of the UIM for mounting to the LIM.

Oh, here's the video of it idling. It idles alot higher then it did with the S5 intake (~950 rpm compared to 600rpm).

Click here to watch Movie4745
Old 10-15-05, 12:25 AM
  #2  
Junior Member

 
slicwily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
your not worried about that air filter sucking up water
Old 10-15-05, 10:18 AM
  #3  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slicwily
your not worried about that air filter sucking up water
Nope.

There will be a shield protecting it from major debris and junk from coming up underneath. I'd also have to go through a pretty nasty puddle to suck up enough to reach the engine.

It's hard to hydrolock a rotary anyways. I have in fact done the water ingestion trick to clean the internals and it works like a charm and nor harm was caused.

I'm also not driving this car another winter and it only sees ~300 miles a month since I only drive it when I want to cruise around.
Old 10-15-05, 01:34 PM
  #4  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Could the higher RPM be cause by the angle of the AFM?

Also, did you follow this guide for the swap?

http://homepage.mac.com/carldavis/intake/dis.html
Old 10-15-05, 01:51 PM
  #5  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jager
Could the higher RPM be cause by the angle of the AFM?

Also, did you follow this guide for the swap?

http://homepage.mac.com/carldavis/intake/dis.html
My AFM was at the kind of angle before the swap and I didn't have a problem. I'll get teh idle figured out, but 950rpm isn't too bad.

I didn't follow that guide at all either since I wanted to set things up a bit differently. For instance, I used the S4 BAC, removed the other bypass-air thing for the A/C that goes into the dynamic chamber, I'm running the VDi off an electric pump and RPM switch, and I used the S4 LIM (just had to drill a new mounting hole in the back of the UIM like Icemark suggested.)

I can't wait to get the VDI actually working though, how much of a difference does it actually make?
Old 10-15-05, 01:56 PM
  #6  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
yeah that angle on the AFM will cause problems and make it hard to tune properly

The S4 AFM needs the be level or near level.
Old 10-15-05, 02:04 PM
  #7  
BDC
BDC Motorsports

 
BDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Good job, Urizen.

B
Old 10-15-05, 02:13 PM
  #8  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
yeah that angle on the AFM will cause problems and make it hard to tune properly

The S4 AFM needs the be level or near level.
Hmmm... in that case I'll have to see about leveling it out some more. I think I'll have to cut that upper pipe back a bit at the bend.
Old 10-15-05, 02:17 PM
  #9  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by uRizen
My AFM was at the kind of angle before the swap and I didn't have a problem. I'll get teh idle figured out, but 950rpm isn't too bad.

I didn't follow that guide at all either since I wanted to set things up a bit differently. For instance, I used the S4 BAC, removed the other bypass-air thing for the A/C that goes into the dynamic chamber, I'm running the VDi off an electric pump and RPM switch, and I used the S4 LIM (just had to drill a new mounting hole in the back of the UIM like Icemark suggested.)

I can't wait to get the VDI actually working though, how much of a difference does it actually make?
I heard like 11 HP off the dynos. But that was with a few other modifications 5-6. I seen them when I researching my VDI thoughts.
Old 10-15-05, 03:44 PM
  #10  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, I moved the AFM to a new spot and everything should be cool now. The hood doesn't hit it and all I have left to do is tap the rubber coupling for the BAC feed and then cap the nipple that I was using.




Are there any problems you guys forsee with going this route? I've never seen anyone run the AFM this close to the TB (guess that mean s less places to leak after the AFM, right? ) so I want to make sure there's not some arcance tuning problem I'm going to run into. Thanks!
Old 10-15-05, 06:42 PM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Dom_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Freeport, Maine
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks good man. When i did this swap back in the day when i had my n/a i also added the racing beat header at the same time but i think the hp went from like 126ish to 138ish. These numbers are off the top of my head, it was quit a while ago when i did this though. I did notice a pretty goo dincrease while driving. I had the vdi hooked up to a toggle so i could open her up on demand it felt awesome to be in the upper revs and then open the vdi and feel the car pull like crazy. It was even more fun when i got the huge streetport ;-) But my n/a days are long gone. Good luck with the swap man. Oh and by moving the afm closer maybe you'll see a little bit better response? that'd be pretty cool. Good luck
Old 10-15-05, 07:40 PM
  #12  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dom_C
Looks good man. When i did this swap back in the day when i had my n/a i also added the racing beat header at the same time but i think the hp went from like 126ish to 138ish. These numbers are off the top of my head, it was quit a while ago when i did this though. I did notice a pretty goo dincrease while driving. I had the vdi hooked up to a toggle so i could open her up on demand it felt awesome to be in the upper revs and then open the vdi and feel the car pull like crazy. It was even more fun when i got the huge streetport ;-) But my n/a days are long gone. Good luck with the swap man. Oh and by moving the afm closer maybe you'll see a little bit better response? that'd be pretty cool. Good luck
Cool, good to here it was worth it and glad my setup isn't too ghetto. I can't wait to get the VDI working.

I do have the full Racing Beat exhaust including the collecting header so I'm hoping to get some decent power out of it.
Old 10-15-05, 09:50 PM
  #13  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got everything re-routed for the new AFM position and it runs the same as it did before. I did some quick adjustments (the idle was a bit lower) and I'll have to play with it more tomarrow.

I learned a new trick today too. When starting a FC with the thermalwax removed it helps to hold the throttle down slightly for a few seconds, otherwise it seems to run way too rich starting up and struggles.
Old 10-15-05, 09:58 PM
  #14  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Icemark, is it possible to use the S4/S5 combos together with a small adapter (similar to what YearsOfDecay was making for the FD setup), or where the holes too far off? Since it seems that the S4 lim works quite a bit better than the s5.
Old 10-15-05, 10:45 PM
  #15  
i'm disrespectful to dirt

 
MrSparkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: soul cal, ca
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i used to have my air filter in the same location and it felt more responsive. but when it started raining i had to move it back. not because i was worried about hydrolock, but because the filter would get soaked which caused a restriction. i still think it's a good setup as long as it's not raining.
Old 10-16-05, 12:38 AM
  #16  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
Icemark, is it possible to use the S4/S5 combos together with a small adapter (similar to what YearsOfDecay was making for the FD setup), or where the holes too far off? Since it seems that the S4 lim works quite a bit better than the s5.
No need for an adapter. Just need to redrill the S5 VDI/UIM on one hole.
Old 10-16-05, 12:42 AM
  #17  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Neat, should've searched for that thread of yours, but with how much you post it would've taken me a year!
Old 10-16-05, 01:34 PM
  #18  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Dom_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Freeport, Maine
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep, that's what i did as well. worked great.
Old 10-16-05, 06:59 PM
  #19  
Do Work

iTrader: (1)
 
RX-7tII88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That setup looks sweet, nice work. Yeah I would think that it would suck in the rain though.
Old 10-16-05, 07:19 PM
  #20  
I live in an igloo

 
BlaCkPlaGUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice work! glad you took our advice on the BAC

That position of the AFM is perfect, as for it being so close the plates I wouldn't worry about that being a problem.

I don't remember, but did how did you get the VDI and 6PI working? are they at stock RPMs? Did you use backpressure for activation and rpm switches or what?
Old 10-16-05, 10:08 PM
  #21  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlaCkPlaGUE
Nice work! glad you took our advice on the BAC

That position of the AFM is perfect, as for it being so close the plates I wouldn't worry about that being a problem.

I don't remember, but did how did you get the VDI and 6PI working? are they at stock RPMs? Did you use backpressure for activation and rpm switches or what?
Cool, thanks for the compliments.

The VDI isn't working ATM and my aux. ports are running off the back pressure as they always have and still work well.

I'm think of capping the split air line right after the spot it runs to the aux. ports and using two of the little vacuum solinoids that I pulled off the spider to regulate when the VDI and ports open. One of the local club members has a way to regulate which RPM electronics activate without buying a RPM switch and it's adjustable. I'll have to get together with him to see how he created the circuit.

I'm going to try capping the line and measuring the pressure first, then if it's above 8psi (just to be safe) from 3,000+ RPM I'll give that method a shot.

That way I don't have to muck with putting another piece of equipment in my bay and I can put some of that rotary exhaust to work.
Old 10-17-05, 04:01 AM
  #22  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
You only need 3psi to operate the VDI actuator. I'd be careful putting too much pressure on it's diaphram...
Old 10-17-05, 07:22 AM
  #23  
Jesus is the Messiah

 
Tofuball's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 4,848
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by uRizen
Ok, I moved the AFM to a new spot and everything should be cool now. The hood doesn't hit it and all I have left to do is tap the rubber coupling for the BAC feed and then cap the nipple that I was using.




Are there any problems you guys forsee with going this route? I've never seen anyone run the AFM this close to the TB (guess that mean s less places to leak after the AFM, right? ) so I want to make sure there's not some arcance tuning problem I'm going to run into. Thanks!

The problem I see is that it's directly over the exhaust manifold :p

But if it can take the heat, it's fine :p
Old 10-17-05, 07:23 AM
  #24  
Jesus is the Messiah

 
Tofuball's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 4,848
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used 5PSI to actuate my ports and its still OK. But I wouldnt go too far over that :O
Old 10-17-05, 08:27 AM
  #25  
XBL** Ownicus

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
uRizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tofuball
I used 5PSI to actuate my ports and its still OK. But I wouldnt go too far over that :O
Cool, so I'll put a bleeder in the system too so if it's over 5psi or so I can crack it open a little to lower the pressure. Hehe, the trouble I go through to keep it low-tech.


Quick Reply: S5 intake swap nearly complete, here's the current status. (pics and vid)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.