2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

S-AFC II - Fuel Consumption

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-08, 10:28 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
wogboy_9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S-AFC II - Fuel Consumption

Hi, I've got an NA 1988 RX7, stock ECU. I'm considering the S-AFC II as the stock ECU runs very rich. If I got it tuned (could I DIY?), and leaned out so it runs optimally, would I have a noticeable decrease in fuel consumption?

thanks.

(P.S- I posted this in the SAFC area, but I don't think anyone goes on there!)
Old 09-06-08, 10:34 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
nvrdone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well let me think, if you remove fuel to lean out the car, then i would say you would probably use less fuel...

Just playing, you will get better mileage on the highway, in town i didn't see much if any. But the butt dyno noticed a difference
Old 09-07-08, 12:13 AM
  #3  
Wiring Nightmare

iTrader: (12)
 
ITSWILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ortonville, MI
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wouldn't do any tuning with out a wideband O2 sensor at the very least.
Old 09-07-08, 01:25 AM
  #4  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
wogboy_9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep definitely would use a wideband O2 ITSWILL.
Let me think nvrdone, yes obviously it will use less fuel, but I'd like to know if it would make a significant difference or not?
What sort of ratio's did you have?
Old 09-07-08, 11:56 AM
  #5  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
you would have to unplug the stock O2 sensor
Old 09-07-08, 11:56 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
nvrdone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tried to be around 13.5:1 at wot but obivously it veries a little.
Old 09-07-08, 12:05 PM
  #7  
Boost knob

iTrader: (13)
 
incubuseva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lake Stevens
Posts: 1,716
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have mine set anywhere from -10% to -20% at low throttle. Open throttle is set to 0. I've gotten anywhere from 180 - just short of 300 mi/tank in my 91 NA. I don't have a wideband O2 yet either. I also am taking off my SAFCII + replacing it with the neo.
Old 09-07-08, 12:34 PM
  #8  
Play Well

 
fcdrifter13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
are you na or turbo, you could always take it to a dyno and use there wideband and have them tune it.
Old 09-07-08, 12:49 PM
  #9  
GTUs WHORE!

iTrader: (1)
 
JunpoweR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area - California
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
use a wideband and leave the stock O2 sensor in and just get another bung for the wideband put in.
Old 09-07-08, 12:56 PM
  #10  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
If the factory O2 sensor is plugged in, the ECU will go into closed loop mode and ignore all your SAFC corrections under low throttle. Trust me, I've had an SAFC, wideband, and stock ECU.
Old 09-07-08, 02:16 PM
  #11  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by arghx
If the factory O2 sensor is plugged in, the ECU will go into closed loop mode and ignore all your SAFC corrections under low throttle. Trust me, I've had an SAFC, wideband, and stock ECU.
Can't you run with the factory O2 disconnected and run the wideband all the time? It seems feasible to me. How do wideband O2 sensors hold up to prolonged use?
Old 09-07-08, 03:21 PM
  #12  
Play Well

 
fcdrifter13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedOfLife
Can't you run with the factory O2 disconnected and run the wideband all the time? It seems feasible to me. How do wideband O2 sensors hold up to prolonged use?
It depends really on placement, type and your EGTs
Old 09-07-08, 04:01 PM
  #13  
RIP Mark

iTrader: (2)
 
YaNi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Most decent wideband's will have a narrowband output that you could use.
Old 09-07-08, 10:34 PM
  #14  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by fcdrifter13
It depends really on placement, type and your EGTs
That's understandable.


arghx, did you ever run your car that way? Wideband all the time? If so do you have any pointers?
Old 09-07-08, 10:43 PM
  #15  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
you cannot tune an SAFC for low load driving with the factory narrowband signal going to the ECU. It will ignore the correction. If you disconnect the factory narrowband then I've been told the ECU will respond to SAFC correction under low load. I never bothered with that, but others have. You could lean it out to 16:1 under low load steady state cruising, which is where I run my car with a standalone.

You could remove the factory 1 wire narrowband sensor and just have your wideband. Then if your wideband has a 0-1v narrowband emulation wire you could splice that into the ECU. This is IMO pointless. If you want a narrowband signal going to the ECU, just use the stock sensor. It saves you trouble. You don't want a wideband in the stock bung, not if you value sensor life.

The general recommendation is 36" (or as far as you can manage and still be before the cat if you have one) from the exhaust ports or turbo, because of the heat of the rotary engine.
Old 09-09-08, 09:31 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
pvilledan125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Albany
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody run this with a turbo rotary? Also incubuseva how come your switching to the neo? Because it's newer or and new features?
Old 09-10-08, 06:37 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
HotRodMex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the R-tek ECUs out there, why do people still mess with an SAFC?
Old 09-10-08, 06:48 PM
  #18  
Wiring Nightmare

iTrader: (12)
 
ITSWILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ortonville, MI
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^ more fuel correction
Old 09-13-08, 02:11 AM
  #19  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
HotRodMex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ITSWILL
^^ more fuel correction
How much more? the SAFC adjusts every 500rpm, which would work out to 16 points. The RTEK does 14x14 for S4 and 18x14 for S5, with the same =/- 50% range.

And you don't get timing control, secondary injector control, VDI control (s5), etc.

I guess you wouldn't be able to tell people you had APEX'i parts on your car

Originally Posted by arghx
You don't want a wideband in the stock bung, not if you value sensor life.
someone should've told that to Honda before they put them in all the Civic VXs

Last edited by HotRodMex; 09-13-08 at 02:15 AM.
Old 09-13-08, 10:14 AM
  #20  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
^ A civic VX does not cruise at ~1600 degrees of EGT under closed loop operation...
Old 09-13-08, 10:42 AM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
pvilledan125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Albany
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As for the person asking why not use the rtek they have not come out with it for s5 turbo.
Old 09-13-08, 05:13 PM
  #22  
dewey

 
katkaroto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well, i know this is odd... but my NA 88 GTU gets like 350 miles to a tank... but that's probably because my aux ports are driven closed all the time. its because the actuators were taken off before i bought the car.
Old 09-13-08, 07:25 PM
  #23  
Boost knob

iTrader: (13)
 
incubuseva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lake Stevens
Posts: 1,716
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by pvilledan125
Anybody run this with a turbo rotary? Also incubuseva how come your switching to the neo? Because it's newer or and new features?
I got a freakin steal on a new one. Plus it has more points to adjust.
Old 09-14-08, 12:30 AM
  #24  
Wiring Nightmare

iTrader: (12)
 
ITSWILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ortonville, MI
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I meant you can add more fuel in conjunction with the rtek.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
bryancmatthews
Power FC Forum
14
10-05-15 08:49 PM
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
09-12-15 12:22 PM
Steven_McKinley
General Rotary Tech Support
12
09-05-15 10:48 AM



Quick Reply: S-AFC II - Fuel Consumption



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.