2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

RTEK gas mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 04:49 PM
  #1  
MattB's Avatar
Thread Starter
MattB
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Haverhill, MA
RTEK gas mileage

i am putting my rtek 1.7 and 720cc secondaries in pretty soon and i was just curious...since rtek will reduce secondary fire to 3500 rpm will my gas mileage be significantly reduced since i usually cruise at 80mph or 3500 rpms on the highway...?


-Matt
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 04:57 PM
  #2  
Turbo II-FB's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
From: Austin-Houston Texas
3MPG City
4 MGP highway
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #3  
Nismo Convert86's Avatar
400WHP or bust
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,048
Likes: 0
From: Walkerton, Ontario Canada
Likely will, but if you have the secondary injector studder (3800 rpm hesitatio) it will be more likey going off and on constantly, I know mine was, not really something you want to happen. My fuel milage with the 1.5 went down a little, but I still manage 550-600km's on the highway (car runs lean) but i have the 550's all the way around.

So yes it will change but you are more likely drive more "spirted"
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 07:08 PM
  #4  
Dom_C's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
From: Freeport, Maine
Also curious on this subject
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #5  
AFgreasemnky's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Germany
It was my understanding that the Rtek chip ran a little rich... Supposedly Rtek 2.0 will be out soon though. And will give you about as much control as most standalones with out the price tag
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:08 PM
  #6  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
I get about 15-16 mpg with mostly city driving. I kept it under 4krpm for a tank once and got about 20 mpg - that was with a lot of highway driving at about 3500 rpm, ~80mph.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:16 PM
  #7  
88rxn/a's Avatar
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
Likely will, but if you have the secondary injector studder (3800 rpm hesitatio) it will be more likey going off and on constantly....
what do you mean????
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #8  
Wizz's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland
I got the 1.7 and 720s. I am getting about 22-23 mile/gal. 80% highway, 20% street.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 10:34 PM
  #9  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
It will make no difference to mileage. When the secondary injectors start to fire the pulsewidth of all four injectors is halved. The amount of fuel injector immediately after the transition is exactly the same as immediately before.

Last edited by NZConvertible; Jan 5, 2006 at 10:36 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 10:38 PM
  #10  
Rex4Life's Avatar
RX-7 Alumni
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 1
From: Spacecenter Houston
I got about 17 mpg composite with 60% highway and 40% city.

On my car the hesitation got worse--I think I know why, the change to 3500 rpm is not good. Basically the secondaries are coming on earlier with insufficient airflow in the secondary runners.

Right now I'm running Megasquirt for fuel and changed the transition to 4000 rpm--it helped alot. Soon I'll be changing the transition to a rpm/map trigger and should be able to totally remove it.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 11:02 PM
  #11  
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
I
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 12
From: Spanaway, WA
yeah the staging wont affect the gas milage really.... my rtek cured my 3800 hesitation amazingly
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 11:36 PM
  #12  
Dom_C's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
From: Freeport, Maine
oh man, 20+ mpg would be brilliant! haha
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:14 AM
  #13  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Rex4Life
I think I know why, the change to 3500 rpm is not good. Basically the secondaries are coming on earlier with insufficient airflow in the secondary runners.
I would say this is probably not the case. The secondaries do not fire unless there's sufficient load (at low load the ECU will fire just the primaries even above 3800rpm). To produce enough load to trigger the secondary injectors you need to open the throttle far enough. Unless your at very light throttle, the secondary throttles are open and flowing.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 06:26 AM
  #14  
Rex4Life's Avatar
RX-7 Alumni
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 1
From: Spacecenter Houston
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
I would say this is probably not the case. The secondaries do not fire unless there's sufficient load (at low load the ECU will fire just the primaries even above 3800rpm). To produce enough load to trigger the secondary injectors you need to open the throttle far enough. Unless your at very light throttle, the secondary throttles are open and flowing.
Yep--only happens on very light throttle--look at the attached graph.



Look at the AFR reading jump up during transition and notice the throttle (S4) is only 93% and rpm slowly increasing. The primary duty cycle is only at 27% so there is no real need to transition to secondaries. The software is being changed to trigger transition based on map and rpm setpoints. We'll see if that ends up fixing the hesitation--I think it will.

Maybe today I'll try a high transistion rpm and just see what it does under light throttle.

Scott

ps-Oh yea make sure you look over to the left on the scale, otherwise these logs can be a little misleading.
Attached Thumbnails RTEK gas mileage-anothertransition.jpg  

Last edited by Rex4Life; Jan 6, 2006 at 06:28 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #15  
Digi7ech's Avatar
I break Diff mounts
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 4
From: Avondale, Arizona
On my 1.5 I am doing on average 18MPG with 80-90mph highway driving 80+% of the time.

The best mileage I've ever gotten was on the back from Sevenstock on the downhills. I did 26mpg!!!! But then the uphill section I did 17mpg so it evened it out.

Really the mileage is dependant on your foot/speed/RPM's more than ECU.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
WyomingTII
Rtek Forum
3
Oct 26, 2015 05:26 PM
Cameron38
1st Gen General Discussion
2
Sep 19, 2015 11:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.