2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

RTEK 1.8, 4 x 750cc injectors, Apexi Neo MAXED - STILL LEAN UNDER WOT

Old May 12, 2012 | 01:22 PM
  #76  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Bearzah
UPDATE: with car idling i grounded each secondary injector at ECU... Front and rear both bogged engine down and killed it = they are working and i have already confirmed secondary injectors are getting signal while running (earlier post)...

Fuel pressure has been checked... According to gauge, at idle its sitting at 50-52 psi (i assume this may not be accurate, but i was checking for PRESSURE DROP)... Under load (no boost) it drops to 42-44 psi and raises up and HOLDS 52-ish psi at 8-9 psi boost. AFRs hit mid-12s under WOT... For the skeptics out there, here's proof: (at beginning of video, the needle is pointed at 50-52psi.. For referance)
So... All i got is either my wideband is **** (new sensor in mail), i need larger injectors and/or time for stage 2 RTEK

... Yup
that's your problem. the fuel pressure should be changing with the boost gauge. either its hooked to the wrong place, or the regulator is bad...
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 05:51 PM
  #77  
RXSpeed16's Avatar
Theoretical Tinkerer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 49
From: Norcal/Bay Area, CA
The walbro/stock fpr combo is probably inflating your idle pressure reading and throwing off your baseline. Once running, the fuel has somewhere to go instead of backing up at the regulator. Considering that, it seems alright to me.

Get rid of the SAFC and see what afr changes you see. You've looked at almost everything else.
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 07:18 PM
  #78  
Clubuser's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 415
Likes: 8
From: Treasure coast
minimum FP occurs @ minimum manifold pressure (max vacuum) then rises along with the rise in manifold pressure. the drop you're experiencing under load simply should not be happening if the pump and FPR are working correctly. sure your FPR is a boost reference type? doesn't look like it.
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 12:43 PM
  #79  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
New wideband sensor installed and actually preheats!!!
.. But, still lean on WOT. *Its mid-11s up to WOT though.
... While i MAY not be maxing my current injectors i don't see why installing larger secondaries couldn't fix my situation >*http://www.injectordynamics.com/ID1000.html
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 02:40 PM
  #80  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Originally Posted by Bearzah
New wideband sensor installed and actually preheats!!!
.. But, still lean on WOT. *Its mid-11s up to WOT though.
... While i MAY not be maxing my current injectors i don't see why installing larger secondaries couldn't fix my situation >*http://www.injectordynamics.comD1000.html
BECAUSE YOUR INJECTORS AREN'T YOUR PROBLEM.

What is so difficult for you to comprehend about the idea of finding the real problem and fixing it? If you had an oil leak, would u just keep dumping in more oil or try to fix why its leaking to begin with? (rhetorical, please dont answer).

Fix your fuel pressure issue and stop looking for ways to waste money on parts you dont need for workaround fixes that dont solve the real problem.
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 03:34 PM
  #81  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
How is 52 psi at boost insuficient? If i ran FSM spec pressure it would be ~39 psi at idle and 49 psi at 10 lbs of boost...
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 04:15 PM
  #82  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
in the video you posted, your fuel pressure is all over the place.. and it appears like it drops as you get closer to redline too
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 04:21 PM
  #83  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Running that fuel pressure on an fd pump w/ 550/720's is enough to get you into 10's our even 9's with your setup so something doesnt add up.

Bear in mind that pressure =/= flow. The greater the restriction, the greater the pressure. As many have already suggested, an aftermarket fpr would be a very good idea.

Open your tank and examine it for sediment. If you find any flush the lines and check the baskets of the injectors for. The only time I've seen these symptoms was when crud got into the fuel system and clogged the secondary injectors. All the electronics tested fine, fuel pressure was good, ecu signal was verified, but the problem persisted. When the injectors were pulled to be swapped the baskets were almost completely filled with crap.

Also, just so were clear, you don't still have that carb filter in place pre pump do you?
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 08:38 PM
  #84  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
... Yeah.. I'm about at the point of removing secondaries and having them cleaned and flowed... Again... Lol

.. No more prefilter.. Just turbo2 filter AFTER pump.
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 08:45 PM
  #85  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
How fast should it take to kill/flood out the engine IDLING after grounding (forcing 100% duty cycle) on one secondary injector? I already tested this while idling to confirm the injectors were actually working.. I was suprised it took a few seconds
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 09:26 PM
  #86  
Clubuser's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 415
Likes: 8
From: Treasure coast
i know i'm wasting my time cause i don't think u give a s$!t to truly think about the advice u're getting. grounding the injectors as u have while idling only proves the injectors responds when grounded. it doesn't prove the ecu is cycling them when supposed to. wish the best of luck in solving your issue. p.s., you have a sweet engine assembly w/400+ whp potential why in the world did you limit yourself to the 1.8?
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 09:31 PM
  #87  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
Originally Posted by Clubuser
i know i'm wasting my time cause i don't think u give a s$!t to truly think about the advice u're getting. grounding the injectors as u have while idling only proves the injectors responds when grounded. it doesn't prove the ecu is cycling them when supposed to. wish the best of luck in solving your issue. p.s., you have a sweet engine assembly w/400+ whp potential why in the world did you limit yourself to the 1.8?
My wiring and ECU were originally installed with a stock turbo2. When it popped I built this one and still run old ECU. RTEK has told me I need their stage 2 ECU to work with my porting and tune my fuel curve.... That's actually a reasonable $$ as I just have to pay to upgrade my 1.8

Last edited by RW-7; May 13, 2012 at 10:13 PM. Reason: Removed the name calling. Infraction given.
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 11:47 AM
  #88  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Originally Posted by Clubuser
i know i'm wasting my time cause i don't think u give a s$!t to truly think about the advice u're getting. grounding the injectors as u have while idling only proves the injectors responds when grounded. it doesn't prove the ecu is cycling them when supposed to. wish the best of luck in solving your issue. p.s., you have a sweet engine assembly w/400+ whp potential why in the world did you limit yourself to the 1.8?
+1
Don't know where you got that silly grounding "test" but that doesn't tell you very much. Check the tank and remove/inspect your injectors. Nothing you post will have any value until you do this.
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 12:03 PM
  #89  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
Dump the rtek. Dump the SAFC. Replace them with something capable of doing the job. End of story.
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 01:02 PM
  #90  
RXSpeed16's Avatar
Theoretical Tinkerer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 49
From: Norcal/Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Bearzah
My wiring and ECU were originally installed with a stock turbo2. When it popped I built this one and still run old ECU. RTEK has told me I need their stage 2 ECU to work with my porting and tune my fuel curve.... That's actually a reasonable $$ as I just have to pay to upgrade my 1.8
So this entire setup has worked on a previous engine without the rising AFR's?

Definitely look into a physical obstruction as suggested above.

Is the SAFC removed and still acting the same way?
Are all your electronics N370 or N374?

An rtek 1.8 should be able to handle a stock turbo on a streetport. Definitely not optimized, but it shouldn't run lean like you are seeing.
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 06:40 PM
  #91  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
Well, RTEK is saying the 1.8 can not compinsate for the ported engine and that he has seen this before on ported engines. He recommends the stage 2 RTEK due to sensor and injector duty cycle data logging and ability to add more fuel where i need it without "teasing" the ECU into thinking it's just flowing more air with AFC
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #92  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
.. Another note... When it's still running on the cold map it runs rich as $#!T.. Usually pegging my wideband full rich.. even 11s under WOT (have only tested when car was warm but JUST before the thermostat opens)
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 08:07 PM
  #93  
198713bt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Why did you even bother starting a thread and asking opinions about your problem if you're not going to take anyone's advice? You've been told multiple times that the RTEK can run your engine and something else is the culprit.
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 08:15 PM
  #94  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
Ease up... I'm trying to figure this out too
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 08:18 PM
  #95  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
the rtek 1.x series are crap. they compensate for larger injectors, so what have you gained by running larger injectors?? it will run lean every time. has anyone really logged decent AFRs with the 1.8? even rtek says some sort of fuel control is needed with the 1.x series. either rtek 2.1 or full standalone is the only way to go
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 08:20 PM
  #96  
198713bt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Just saying, the Rtek can handle your ported engine...just like everyone has told you. The fuel injectors are big enough.....just like everyone has told you. Take everybody's advice and pull the injectors and check the screens.
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 11:03 PM
  #97  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
... Taking them in tomorrow...

Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 06:49 PM
  #98  
Bearzah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Me Wantee Da' Boostee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
From: corvallis, or
The good: RCs were within 1% of 750cc and only 0.5% difference between the two

The bad: Injector Dynamics injectors failed... One was only flowing 651cc... Here's a pic of their paperwork

soooo.... Replace with 750cc injectors or go bigger and lean out with Neo? Hmmmm.....

Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 07:07 PM
  #99  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Bearzah
How fast should it take to kill/flood out the engine IDLING after grounding (forcing 100% duty cycle) on one secondary injector? I already tested this while idling to confirm the injectors were actually working.. I was suprised it took a few seconds
i had an FD with a stuck secondary and it would idle with that much fuel, big clouds of smoke, but it would stay running
Reply
Old May 18, 2012 | 06:34 AM
  #100  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
interesting.. where the ID injectors brand new?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 PM.