removing 5th and 6th ports.... do not reply unless you have done this personally
removing 5th and 6th ports.... do not reply unless you have done this personally
ok i posted a while back about doing this.... when i port my manifolds i will have most of the motor apart and might as well do it then if neccessary. i had alot of opninons of people reply to my thread saying, they think its a good idea or a bad idea... i want people with experience not hearsay...
its a stockport motor with
CAI
TB mod
Ported intakes
Header
Test pipe
RP 50mm catback
Removed most engine bay crap
Rats nest removal
EGR blockoff plate
No ACV
and will soon have
SAFC controller or standalone
New injectors
ignition amplifier
8.5 mm wires
new plugs
and later on a 75-100 shot of n2o
so would i benefit removing the 5th and 6th ports entirely? thanks in advance
its a stockport motor with
CAI
TB mod
Ported intakes
Header
Test pipe
RP 50mm catback
Removed most engine bay crap
Rats nest removal
EGR blockoff plate
No ACV
and will soon have
SAFC controller or standalone
New injectors
ignition amplifier
8.5 mm wires
new plugs
and later on a 75-100 shot of n2o
so would i benefit removing the 5th and 6th ports entirely? thanks in advance
What would the benefits be, instead of just removing them, of leaving them in place but open, with Pineapple racing inserts? Smoother flow - the stock arrangement is particularly bad for airflow, or so it seems.
-=Russ=-
-=Russ=-
I aggree with Dezerte.. But *Properly* working 6 ports do feel nice. I have a large SP s4, and it felt great for a while, but after a few months of messing with it, it felt slower.. So i tied the ports open to see what it would feel like.. the car felt and sounded different. So i said screw it, and i pulled the LIM off and ripped them out, and blocked off the actuators.. everything is removed.. and the car has never felt so good.. it pulls so much harder and pulls up to 8KRPMS, although it still needs to be tuned badly. I haven't noticed any loss of low end power.
If i had to do it again, i would.
Justin
If i had to do it again, i would.
Justin
I removed mine when i had my na, it felt nice for a while, but i definatly missed the low end power. I had no power till about 4k. If you dont mid reving high to make your power go for it but if you want to beable to punch it below 4k then leav ethem working.
I used to have a similar setup in my vert except my motor has a mild streetport and true duals on it. I took a noticable hit in torque down low, you might not lose as much because of the stock porting. It did pull a bit harder at higher rpms though, just make sure you get rid of the rods and everything in there.
When I swapped my engine into the GTU I went back to 5th and 6th ports w/ an S5 manifold, I miss my torque.
When I swapped my engine into the GTU I went back to 5th and 6th ports w/ an S5 manifold, I miss my torque.
Earlier this year I removed the 6 PI sleeves while doing other maintenance on the intake manifolds. Up to that point the sleeves were stuck closed. I personally did not like the loss of low RPM torque, so I put the sleeves back in with the Pineapple Racing inserts (properly installed with green loctite). My car was weak up to about 3.5k RPMs without the sleeves.
I like the working version of the 6 PI system, because it makes the car easy to drive smoothly around town. If you want maximum peak horsepower though, you may want to eliminate them. I did notice slightly more pull in the higher RPMs without the sleeves; however, I will never remove the sleeves from my car. I prefer the broad, usable RPM range that the 6 PI system provides over the high RPM punch resulting from removing the sleeves.
I like the working version of the 6 PI system, because it makes the car easy to drive smoothly around town. If you want maximum peak horsepower though, you may want to eliminate them. I did notice slightly more pull in the higher RPMs without the sleeves; however, I will never remove the sleeves from my car. I prefer the broad, usable RPM range that the 6 PI system provides over the high RPM punch resulting from removing the sleeves.
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Tofuball
Gain in middle and high end cannot be denied.
But the loss in low end makes me decide to keep mine in my modified N/A . . .
But the loss in low end makes me decide to keep mine in my modified N/A . . .
I tend to disagree with you Aaron, sorry. The sleeves/rods/etc themselves can become a restriction as an N/A becomes more and more modified. At a high level of modifcation you might actually show top end gains by removing these minor restrictions. However, at a low level of modification you are correct.
As to the thread starter. I believe last time you asked this I pointed you in the direction of the archived thread on removing the sleeves completely along with everyone's arguments as to whether it is good or not and discussion on when, if it should, be done, etc etc etc. That thread is all the information you really need.
As to the thread starter. I believe last time you asked this I pointed you in the direction of the archived thread on removing the sleeves completely along with everyone's arguments as to whether it is good or not and discussion on when, if it should, be done, etc etc etc. That thread is all the information you really need.
Oh yah just came to mind. With your exhaust setup are your aux ports even opening? Might wanna check that out as you have a testpipe now (no cat) which I'm guessing means no split air pipe and no backpressure to open the ports. Or are you running them off of the airpump? Or are they wired open? Removing them completely would be better than wiring them open if that's the route you've taken.
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
They will only be a restriction if the engine is ported. The stock ports simply cannot flow enough air to make the sleeve matter.
yes i remember that thread doub but i had very few replies and i dont remember if you said you had done it or not.... well i will be removing them then because i have the ports wired closed right now because it idles better and is nicer to drive in the morning... thanks for the replies, it was really all i wanted to know from the experienced people that have done this... thanks again
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Kahren
that is simply not true.

Edit...My experience with this is that removal of the sleeves results in a car that is overall slower in the 1/4 mile. However, your mileage, as always, may vary.
I anticipated not using the 5th/6th port on my engine before the rebuild. I use a ramp of Devcon to smooth the transition into the chamber. Haven't made it to the dyno yet but the car is drivable at lower rpm. But, I didn't build it or port it to drive at lower rpm's. It will spin safely and reliably to 8500 rpm and thats why we choose the porting we did. Over 4K rpm the engine really comes to life. Lower and middle intake pieces are port matched. Very free flowing exhaust and a fuel computer to top it off.
Last edited by MPM; Nov 1, 2004 at 03:47 PM.
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
OK.....Proof? 
Edit...My experience with this is that removal of the sleeves results in a car that is overall slower in the 1/4 mile. However, your mileage, as always, may vary.

Edit...My experience with this is that removal of the sleeves results in a car that is overall slower in the 1/4 mile. However, your mileage, as always, may vary.
thanks again guys... after i do this im going to make a thread listing my mods and my results, however they wont be dyno results
but i can maybe explain it better and honestly so that questions like this can be answered better
but i can maybe explain it better and honestly so that questions like this can be answered better
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM



