dreamnshadow

i might buy one of these soon, anyways, my question, is can it bring my -2.0 rear camber to -1.0 or less? because i'm shooting for less camber in rear than front. like -1.1 for front and -.9 or less for rear. also, what should my caster setting be?

Scott 89t2

should get it close to -1 range is around .75 - 1 change I think... stock is -1 I think. anything between -1 and -2 isn't bad.

dreamnshadow

yah but i dont want too much tire wear. do u think -1.0 on rear and -1.2 on front will have not too much tire wear? and will have good balance? im trying to get rid of understeer.

dreamnshadow

and what does dimpling the cloor pan mean? says i need to do that to double the results...

mr_vaughn

iTrader: (1)

i have about -1.0 with a rear adjestable link but if i want it closer to 0 i get subframe bumpping on the chassis.
i have racing beat springs and kyb shocks
the car has about 1 -1.4 inch drop.

it was @ -2.5 before i installed it

dreamnshadow

oh ok, that sounds good.

also, i noticed that my rear shocks are really bouncy. after i plan on getting the alignment fine, i plan on driving to the shop where i got them and replacing it if it's bad. if i replace the car with new shocks, and its not bouncy anymore, will that ruin the alignment and i'll have to go back to align it again?

dreamnshadow

bump..

Scott 89t2

change the shocks first

AE_Racer

iTrader: (1)

yea, your bad shocks may sag, causing you to have more camber than you would have with good shocks

dreamnshadow

will driving 40 miles with -2.0 camber eat my tires?

Scott 89t2

no.. maybe if it was at -5.

camber barly causes any wear. it's toe that does it.

I've been runing -2.5 front and -1.5 camber for 2 years and unequal wear is barly noticeable

dreamnshadow

really....? hmmm.... the thing is tho, i want less camber in the rear then the front... i dont think i can get the front camber to -2.5 without camber plates. will rotating and adjusting the front struts get me to that?