2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Question about Water temp and e-fan thermo switch positioning ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2012 | 11:25 PM
  #26  
misterstyx69's Avatar
Retired Moderator, RIP
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (142)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 136
From: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Originally Posted by Romanator
I like where this thread is going.

Also, I already have the water pump drilled and tapped for the haltech sensor.
I hope you didn't drill anything Roman, as you didn't have to tap the waterpump to put C Ludwig's sensor in.
it would have fit,like stock.(stock threads,screws right in)
Reply
Old May 24, 2012 | 11:41 PM
  #27  
TheGloriousTachikoma's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
I'm wondering, the new rad I bought puts the rad outlet 1.5" too low. What are the downsides to putting the thermoswitch in the return hose from the rad to the engine? The adapter for the sensor would extend the hose enough that I wouldn't need to buy a new hose. It would also put the sensor wiring right by the wires for the fan motor; keep that part of the harness simpler.

Last edited by TheGloriousTachikoma; May 25, 2012 at 12:00 AM.
Reply
Old May 25, 2012 | 12:14 AM
  #28  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 64
From: Mile High
I don't see much difference between the upper and lower hose for your trigger but you'd need a different switch, based on location.
A switch in the lower hose would see much lower temps than one in the upper, you'd need to know how rad exit temp correlated to the coolant temp measured in the block (what your gauge reads).
Reply
Old May 25, 2012 | 12:20 AM
  #29  
TheGloriousTachikoma's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Originally Posted by clokker
I don't see much difference between the upper and lower hose for your trigger but you'd need a different switch, based on location.
A switch in the lower hose would see much lower temps than one in the upper, you'd need to know how rad exit temp correlated to the coolant temp measured in the block (what your gauge reads).
Bah, there's never a simple solution, is there? XP Ah well, I have to replace 4 fewer wires in the harness than I previously thought, I'll buy a new hose.
Reply
Old May 25, 2012 | 07:10 AM
  #30  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 64
From: Mile High
Putting the trigger in the upper hose is the "simple" solution...what you wanted was a "convenient" fix.
Not quite the same.

Are you planning on a failsafe manual override in case the trigger fails?
It's pretty simple, you can use the stock harness for most of the wiring.
Reply
Old May 25, 2012 | 07:39 AM
  #31  
misterstyx69's Avatar
Retired Moderator, RIP
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (142)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 136
From: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Originally Posted by misterstyx69
I hope you didn't drill anything Roman, as you didn't have to tap the waterpump to put C Ludwig's sensor in.
it would have fit,like stock.(stock threads,screws right in)
Duh,.. I forgot you had the 3/8 stuff in there.
I just questioned my own answer..lol!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
9
Feb 24, 2019 12:09 PM
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
Sep 5, 2015 10:23 AM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.