2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Question about running rich and 5th&6th port

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-06, 12:44 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Corbic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question about running rich and 5th&6th port

I have an '88 FC GXL. It's 5th and 6th are seized shut and I recently had my rusted out exhaust and catt replaced with a nice long piece of alluminum tubing for $40.

I'm getting horrible gas mileage these days. I drive mainly in the city and normally shift at or before 3,000rmps.. I'm getting about 16.5-17.5mpg (200miles per tank).

Is this normally fo an N/A or is this because of the exhaust (o2 sensor issues) or 5th and 6th port? What else can I look into and replace to help my engine run better? Is uncloging my ports something I can do with ease and in a few hours or should I take it to a Rotary shop and shell out the cash. Will deleting my air-pump improve fuel economy and power?

Thanks.
Old 07-17-06, 12:55 PM
  #2  
very sleepy!!

 
TitosToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it is normal for a n/a to run rich because the factory program the ecu that way. but if your aux. ports are seized then you should consider cleaning them out. if you get it done, try driving a lil above 4k to open them up. and also check your actuators to see if they're working properly
Old 07-17-06, 12:58 PM
  #3  
very sleepy!!

 
TitosToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
btw, your mileage is pretty normal.
Old 07-17-06, 01:19 PM
  #4  
My **** keeps breaking.

iTrader: (2)
 
SystemIDx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dunno about that. I get around 300 miles to the tank in my 86 N/A. The only thing I have done to it is intake filter and catback exhaust really. It really depends on how heavy your foot is.
Old 07-17-06, 03:25 PM
  #5  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Corbic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SystemIDx
I dunno about that. I get around 300 miles to the tank in my 86 N/A. The only thing I have done to it is intake filter and catback exhaust really. It really depends on how heavy your foot is.

Never above 3k, thats the thing, I would expect this kind of mileage if I was flooring it and shifting at 5,500 RPMs all the time, however I'm not. 16-17mpg is TII territory to my understanding. I'm only making 100hp at this rate.
Old 07-17-06, 05:19 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
sintri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
flooring and shifting at red gets me like 10mpg, stock 86 n/a was rated at 17 mpg city and 24 highway.
Old 07-17-06, 05:37 PM
  #7  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (7)
 
Sideways7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Temple, Texas (Central)
Posts: 6,596
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I got 18 or so with a pretty heavy foot, but that was with a fresh rebuild. For an older engine with lower compression 16-17 isn't that abnormal. Its also possible the injectors need to be cleaned which can hurt milage.
If the aux ports are siezed shut then I can say without any doubt that they have no effect whatsoever on the gas milage, except possibly helping it in high-rpm driving.
Also, hes only getting 200 miles per tank because hes not running near empty. Assuming 17 mpg and using 16 gallons (almost a full tank) he could go 270+ miles. Quoting milage per tank is very misleading because you don't know how empty it got.

Last edited by Sideways7; 07-17-06 at 05:40 PM.
Old 07-17-06, 07:10 PM
  #8  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
17mpg is on the low side of normal. You could improve it with basic tuneup stuff maybe.

And believe it or not people, N/A's don't run that rich in around town driving. I'm probably one of the only people here who actually has a wideband on his N/A, and I can tell you that it will stay around stoich (between 14 and 15:1) just like any other car. Under light acceleration it will drop into the 13's. It's only under WOT that it will drop into the 11's once you hit around 5 grand or so, at least on my car (which is heavily modded for a street car).
Old 07-17-06, 10:23 PM
  #9  
Junior Member

 
rexaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i i have a 88gxl. a new fuel pump filter n o2 sensor will unbeleivably bring your gas mileage up. i had close to 180 hp and i was getting around 23 mpg. its all in the tunning.

light rims help a lot too lol. i had convertible rims so it helped a lot.
Old 07-18-06, 12:28 AM
  #10  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by TitosToy
it is normal for a n/a to run rich because the factory program the ecu that way.
It is normal for any stock engine to run rich under load, but it is not normal to run rich at other times.
Old 07-18-06, 11:20 AM
  #11  
very sleepy!!

 
TitosToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
It is normal for any stock engine to run rich under load, but it is not normal to run rich at other times.
including idle?
Old 07-18-06, 09:04 PM
  #12  
Richard

 
PSYCOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mileage seems right

i get almost 300 from a tank on both my 85 gsl se and my 88 gsl both na. between 17 and 20 mpg pretty much however I drive it.
Old 07-18-06, 09:51 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
synesthete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland. OR
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Corbic
I have an '88 FC GXL. It's 5th and 6th are seized shut and I recently had my rusted out exhaust and catt replaced with a nice long piece of alluminum tubing for $40.
If the cats are gone with a straight pipe then the auxiliary ports won't open even if they are unstuck. If the problem with the ports didnt develop until after that exhaust work then they are not stuck, they just wont open without the split air pipe from your old main cat hooked up somehow. You'll have to rig up some other way of activating those. As far as the mileage i agree that is on the low side of normal a tuneup might help a little. I get ~20mpg and usually shift around 4 with mostly light throttle.
Old 07-19-06, 06:19 AM
  #14  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by TitosToy
including idle?
Rotaries like to idle a little bit on the rich side, but nowhere near as rich as full load.
Old 07-19-06, 09:32 PM
  #15  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Corbic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the 5th&6th where clogged before the exhuast.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
82streetracer
Haltech Forum
11
03-11-19 05:34 PM
Feffman
Racing Kills Lounge
0
08-15-15 06:19 AM



Quick Reply: Question about running rich and 5th&6th port



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.