2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Prospective buyer with questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 08:15 AM
  #1  
adamsonem's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Prospective buyer with questions

I tried searching the forum for answers to these questions, but could not return any related results.

I'm going to have my car sold soon, and I'm thinking about getting a 90 or 91. I was thinking along the lines of a turbo coupe, but I wouldn't mind a na convertible.

Are these are reliable cars to own?
How well do they handle in the rain (and/or snow)?
Any general problems I should look out for when considering one to purchase?
Would you recommend na or turbo?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #2  
SOIA's Avatar
Take A Look Around
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Portage La Prairie, MB Canada
#1: NO
#2: Terribly, but fun
#3: http://aaroncake.net/RX-7/tech1.htm
#4: Depends on what your looking for NA would be a little more reliable.


oh and read "FAQ FOR FCs"
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
trent1059's Avatar
bone stock vert
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: granbury Texas
#1: not abused and maintained properly as reliable as any 15+ year old car
#2 Good tires handle in the rain well, remember its rear wheel drive and likes to go sideways if too much power applied in the wet, I do not know about snow...I live in Texas
#3: http://aaroncake.net/RX-7/tech1.htm or this forum
#4: NAs are a little more reliable for the most part, I am not sure if that is related to the car or the drivers, it is fun to abuse a turbo and from what I see turbos spend more time at full throttle


Just my 2 cents, I have a NA vert and it is a wonderful, fun and reliable car.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #4  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by trent1059
#1: not abused and maintained properly as reliable as any 15+ year old car
#2 Good tires handle in the rain well, remember its rear wheel drive and likes to go sideways if too much power applied in the wet, I do not know about snow...I live in Texas
#3: http://aaroncake.net/RX-7/tech1.htm or this forum
#4: NAs are a little more reliable for the most part, I am not sure if that is related to the car or the drivers, it is fun to abuse a turbo and from what I see turbos spend more time at full throttle.
^ Same
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #5  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
OK guys, I think we've covered it.

Also, a search for "new owner", "reliable", "buying questions" and variations on that theme should turn up lots of info.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
May 25, 2021 05:37 AM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 5, 2015 08:57 PM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.