2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Out of boredom...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-05, 06:51 PM
  #1  
...94% correct.

Thread Starter
 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Out of boredom...

...I built an individual throttle body assembly and manifold that bolts to the S4 LIM. It uses four 38mm throttle bodies with runners to the individual four ports on the LIM. I bored out the ports on the LIM to make the transition from 36mm runners smooth and even but there's a little bit of chokeage from the stock piece it's self. I may go back some time and build a different lower or build this to bolt straight to the block...but dunno...just doing this because I'm bored.

Anyway, I built four runners inline to the ITB's and welded injector bungs on the first and fourth runner so that I could bolt up an S5 fuel rail and pressure regulator. I may make a custom fuel rail later but don't see the need. I intend to leave the primaries right where they are.

The ITB's are verticle. there will be no plenum...I'm just going to make four individual runners that will merge just before the stock air meter...but I'm relocating said meter to make a mass air assembly easier to use later on if i change ems.

At the moment I intend to run it with the stock computer and injectors and everything. i'm not really expecting any kind of gain...it's just something I want to tinker with. It's going on a mild mild port engine and will have a full exhaust, running premix...obviously.

Anny comments?
Old 09-23-05, 12:11 AM
  #2  
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
eriksseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,137
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
weird...

(lol)

Can you take any pics?
Old 09-23-05, 12:15 AM
  #3  
I'm awesome!

 
IaMtHeRuThLeSs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Greenville, SC & Atlanta, GA & Clovis, NM
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:thisthreadisworthlesswithoutpics:
Old 09-23-05, 12:21 AM
  #4  
...94% correct.

Thread Starter
 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I didn't bring my digicam to work with me or I would have taken step-by-step shots. It's not very impressive...just a imple flange with splayed runners. It'll require some work and some better tubing than what I have to make a nice gradual and madrel transition...the #1 and #4 runners are coming in at a decent angle.

...man, I just had a thought about how cool it is to be able to go down to the shop and whip together a ITB manifold at work.

Last edited by Makenzie71; 09-23-05 at 12:24 AM.
Old 09-23-05, 12:22 AM
  #5  
R.I.P. Icemark

iTrader: (2)
 
staticguitar313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: gilbert, arizona
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
iagreewiththeassholethatdidn'tusespacesaboveme
Old 09-23-05, 12:31 AM
  #6  
I live in an igloo

 
BlaCkPlaGUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man, thread is totally useless without pics.
Old 09-23-05, 12:37 AM
  #7  
(_8(|)

 
88t2romad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.
Attached Thumbnails Out of boredom...-ttiwwop.gif  
Old 09-23-05, 12:38 AM
  #8  
Junior Member

 
boostaddctn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PICS please aight peace
Old 09-23-05, 12:44 AM
  #9  
...94% correct.

Thread Starter
 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
holy crap...this has been here for 6 hours and now everyone cares and everyone wants pics...lol.

Gotta wait til the a.m...I was looking for insight on using the assembly with the stock management mostly at the time...but I WILL get you guys some pictures I promise...lol
Old 09-23-05, 09:16 AM
  #10  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Must have had a lot of boredom time.

Sounds cool, but with the stock ECU you need to respect how the primaries open with regards to the secondaries. At low throttle, the primary throttle plates open a little before the secondaries do. This way, you drive on the primary ports only under VERY light throttle and idle. This dramatically improves low end, idle stability, off idle throttle response, etc. Grab an FC throttle body, look through it and observe the action of the throttle plates while you "rev" it and you will see what I mean. The stock ECU doesn't deal very well with all the ports opening at once, and you will find that idle and off idle throttle is terrible. Hesitations at low throttle will also result.

Also, this thread is useless without pics.
Old 09-23-05, 10:36 AM
  #11  
...94% correct.

Thread Starter
 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Motorcycle throttle bodies are great...they are, by far, the easiest things to tune. I slapped these on a make shift manifold I built for my supra a while back and synced them all. The center two open up 5* before the other two. I'm not sure that's enough...I'll have to wait til I have another RX-7 to put them on...lol. I'm thinking at most 10* advance...it's just hard to duplicate the stock bodies very easily.
Old 09-23-05, 10:58 AM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
kiyoshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want to see it in Pics!
Old 09-23-05, 06:46 PM
  #13  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
You realise that 4x38mm is smaller than 3x45mm?
Old 09-23-05, 06:57 PM
  #14  
FLY NAVY


iTrader: (1)
 
jl1rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Front Royal, VA
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
do you use new math or did i miss something
Old 09-23-05, 10:12 PM
  #15  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
You missed something.

The combined area of his four 38mm diameter throttles is less than the combined area of the stock three 45mm diameter throttles.
Old 09-23-05, 10:46 PM
  #16  
Displacement > Boost

 
88IntegraLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
*slightly*
Old 09-24-05, 03:08 AM
  #17  
...94% correct.

Thread Starter
 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Sorry NZVert...that was a typo....lol. They're 48mm bodies.
Old 09-24-05, 04:58 AM
  #18  
multipersonality disorder

 
GUITARJUNKIE28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
38*~3.14= ~113 * 4 = ~452

45*~3.14= ~141 * 3 = ~424

am i wrong?
Old 09-24-05, 10:21 AM
  #19  
...94% correct.

Thread Starter
 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
38*~3.14= ~113 * 4 = ~452

45*~3.14= ~141 * 3 = ~424

am i wrong?
You're wrong. Total surface area of all four throttle bodies (if they were 38mm) would be 4536.46mm. Total surface area of the 3 45mm stockers is 4771.293mm.

I'm looking at having 7238.228mm.
Old 09-24-05, 02:04 PM
  #20  
I live in an igloo

 
BlaCkPlaGUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where Are Those Pics!!!!
Old 09-24-05, 03:37 PM
  #21  
multipersonality disorder

 
GUITARJUNKIE28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
You're wrong. Total surface area of all four throttle bodies (if they were 38mm) would be 4536.46mm. Total surface area of the 3 45mm stockers is 4771.293mm.

I'm looking at having 7238.228mm.

do the math for me if you would please...
Old 09-24-05, 07:31 PM
  #22  
Displacement > Boost

 
88IntegraLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Area = pi*r^2, not Pi*diameter

Area is proportional to the square of the radius, not proportional to the diameter.

Old 09-24-05, 08:11 PM
  #23  
multipersonality disorder

 
GUITARJUNKIE28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
d'oh... migraines, darvocet and math don't mix

i was going for circumference for whatever reason...
Old 09-24-05, 08:22 PM
  #24  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
sounds like an interesting project but a simple larger dual stage throttle body would be much simpler as there would be no tuning and no trying to figure out how to stage the secondaries properly.
Old 09-24-05, 08:33 PM
  #25  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
the hardest thing i would imagine is making the fuel rail, the tps hookup, and the throtle linkage. its pretty easy. i have the same idea but i will use gsxr thotle bodies.


Quick Reply: Out of boredom...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 AM.