2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

This one is for Mr. ******* 0_0 fuel system....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 12:40 PM
  #1  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Question This one is for Mr. Icemark 0_0 fuel system....

Originally posted by Icemark
Its a left over Honda tuner thing... a lot of people that deal with small block 4 and 6 cyl engines, a bigger secondary nets them more HP.

So they buy a RX-7 and figure the same must be true for a rotary....

Of course it isn't.
Mark- Has there ever been tests done with the STOCK fuel setup for the N/a's that showed how much HP they can REALLY handle whithout being at 85% duty cycle or leaning out??

I hear and read(sometimes say it myself) that the N/a fuel setup will handle 200-250hp with not mods(given it works 100% good). Where was this initially based off of?

Has this even been done for a TII? Is there a formula directly relating CC's to AFR's and then to HP?

Santiago
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 02:56 PM
  #2  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
I think Ted said that testing showed the stock injectors are good up to about 250HP.

But regardless, my comment was more towards the people that the third mod they do (after a cone filter and a cat back) is too bolt on bigger injectors.

Which in the case of a basicly stock Honda, will give you more HP, but in the case of a mechanically stock 13B, will actually lower the HP.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #3  
BlackRx7's Avatar
Daily Domestic Killer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,425
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Tx, USA


well said Icemark, that said I really wouldn't even upgrade the injectors unless your running 12 psi + on the stock turbo or an upgraded turbo, right now I'm running my car with a large street port, intake, 2.5 full exhaust, and a walbro, not to mention all the gauges,. running the stock turbo with a ported wastegate, max boost I see is 7 psi, and the shocker is it runs THE Best on 87 octane!!! and it still is running rich!!!

although I just got back from the wed night drags, I ran 93 octane just for safteys sake and my car didn't idle as good with 93 and definalty didn't feel as fast with the 87, but hey this is the first time I made it back from the track this year without blowing the motor :p
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #4  
BlackRx7's Avatar
Daily Domestic Killer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,425
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Tx, USA
forgot to say I'm running the stock injectors
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 06:51 PM
  #5  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Yeah I know but I was asking about the MYTH or possible misconception of them holding up to 250hp.

I will ask ReTed though. Hopefully he see's this and chimes in. If not its PM time

Thanks guys. Santiago
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 12:21 AM
  #6  
SnowmanSteiner's Avatar
Ga-nome liberator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
From: Hell
I agree mainly with what you said Icemark. But if you get at least a piggyback system when you upgrade injectors you can utilize them more. You can lean out the afr in low and mid range, and then bump it up when you start overboosting.

- Steiner
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 01:30 AM
  #7  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
For four 460cc/min injectors, if you use a figure of 8cc/min of fuel per flywheel kW and an 80% duty cycle you get a figure of 247hp.

That doesn't necessarily mean the NA fuel system can support 250hp. This is merely the appoximate amount of power the injectors can support. It doesn't mean the fuel pump or the ECU are up to the task.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 08:59 AM
  #8  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Originally posted by SnowmanSteiner
I agree mainly with what you said Icemark. But if you get at least a piggyback system when you upgrade injectors you can utilize them more. You can lean out the afr in low and mid range, and then bump it up when you start overboosting.

- Steiner

My main concern was with the MYTH...not truth(in theory) that the N/a system can hold up to that much HP.

Tii's are a whole separate ball game

Thanks guys.

Santiago
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 10:35 AM
  #9  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by NZConvertible
For four 460cc/min injectors, if you use a figure of 8cc/min of fuel per flywheel kW and an 80% duty cycle you get a figure of 247hp.

That doesn't necessarily mean the NA fuel system can support 250hp. This is merely the appoximate amount of power the injectors can support. It doesn't mean the fuel pump or the ECU are up to the task.
There you go!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
bryancmatthews
Power FC Forum
14
Oct 5, 2015 08:49 PM
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
Sep 12, 2015 12:22 PM
Steven_McKinley
General Rotary Tech Support
12
Sep 5, 2015 10:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.