Ok, I'm confused. Doesn't the AC rob power?
#26
F yo couch!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Belleville, NJ
Posts: 2,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you would feal the difference if you removed the system like a fat chick would feal the difference after lypo, the extra weight is loading down the power, however it is neccessary for cooling the drivizer humanizer part of the car.
i wish i had A/C
i wish i had A/C
#29
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by dean23
a\c power rob is crap. dont you watch mythbusters?
Originally Posted by Valkyrie
Most Americans could make up for the A/C just by losing their guts.
The extra air probably give you a bit more torque do to leaning out the fuel air ratio, which is rich on stock NAs.
Originally Posted by '87 turbo II
I didn't see an explination for the better throttle response or faster acceleration but maybe starting from an 1,100 RPM idle just seems faster with my driving style.
Originally Posted by Sideways7
Throttle response might be better just because the idle is higher and in a range where the engine has better response.
The BAC adds so little air that I doubt it would have any noticable difference at WOT.
#31
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
If you remember they did two different tests at two different speeds and got two opposite results. At the lower speed having the windows down was more efficient than having the A/C on, but at the higher speed having the A/C on was more efficient than having the windows down. This is because the A/C's average load is more or less constant regardless of speed, but the aerodynamic drag from open windows increases with speed. Every vehicle will have a particular speed above which using the A/C is more fuel efficient than lowering the windows, depending on the vehicle's aerodynamics and A/C capacity. In the Mythbusters tests that speed was in between their two test speeds.
Did you really need to quote the entire post above yours just to say that?
Did you really need to quote the entire post above yours just to say that?
Nope, that's not how AFM-based EFI systems work. The extra air is metered and fuel is added accordingly. Any AFR change would be tiny and simply a result of being at a slightly different load/rpm point on the fuel map.
#34
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by Valkyrie
I didn't really see any reason not to.
Your reply had nothing to do with most of the post you quoted.
It clutters up the thread with useless, wasted space.
It's inconsiderate to other readers.
It makes you look like a 15yo forum noob.
Need more?
Yes, but I think there would be more air for whatever level of throttle the ECU is seeing, so I think it's possible that the BAC could give you extra air, although it will be partially compensated for by the AFM.
Of course that depends on whether the AFM "overrides" the TPS...
Originally Posted by '87 turbo II
I turned on the A/C and white thin smokey stuff came out of th events. It was cool(as in low temperature) but what made it smokey?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
03-17-22 02:46 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
04-14-16 12:58 PM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
08-18-15 05:30 PM