2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Ok, I'm confused. Doesn't the AC rob power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-07, 09:50 PM
  #26  
F yo couch!

iTrader: (6)
 
helghast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Belleville, NJ
Posts: 2,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you would feal the difference if you removed the system like a fat chick would feal the difference after lypo, the extra weight is loading down the power, however it is neccessary for cooling the drivizer humanizer part of the car.

i wish i had A/C
Old 06-04-07, 10:01 PM
  #27  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
Valkyrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Japanabama
Posts: 4,732
Received 88 Likes on 64 Posts
I had no A/C, then installed it. Not that much difference in speed.
Old 06-04-07, 10:20 PM
  #28  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
its a ton. you can feel it. put the ac on going down the highway. then put it on cruise controle. youll feel that **** instantly.
Old 06-05-07, 05:48 AM
  #29  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by dean23
a\c power rob is crap. dont you watch mythbusters?
If you remember they did two different tests at two different speeds and got two opposite results. At the lower speed having the windows down was more efficient than having the A/C on, but at the higher speed having the A/C on was more efficient than having the windows down. This is because the A/C's average load is more or less constant regardless of speed, but the aerodynamic drag from open windows increases with speed. Every vehicle will have a particular speed above which using the A/C is more fuel efficient than lowering the windows, depending on the vehicle's aerodynamics and A/C capacity. In the Mythbusters tests that speed was in between their two test speeds.

Originally Posted by Valkyrie
Most Americans could make up for the A/C just by losing their guts.
Did you really need to quote the entire post above yours just to say that?

The extra air probably give you a bit more torque do to leaning out the fuel air ratio, which is rich on stock NAs.
Nope, that's not how AFM-based EFI systems work. The extra air is metered and fuel is added accordingly. Any AFR change would be tiny and simply a result of being at a slightly different load/rpm point on the fuel map.

Originally Posted by '87 turbo II
I didn't see an explination for the better throttle response or faster acceleration but maybe starting from an 1,100 RPM idle just seems faster with my driving style.
There's definitely a small performance loss whenever the A/C compressor is engaged, there's no way to avoid that. Other than increasing the idle speed, the ECU does nothing to make the engine perform any differently with the A/C on, the extra load being compensated for by your right foot. Maybe you’re just over-compensating.

Originally Posted by Sideways7
Throttle response might be better just because the idle is higher and in a range where the engine has better response.
Idle speed cannot have any effect on throttle response, because by definition throttle response is how the engine response while driving, and you don't drive at 750-1000rpm.

The BAC adds so little air that I doubt it would have any noticable difference at WOT.
I don't even think the BAC valve operates once engine speeds is over 1500-2000rpm.
Old 06-05-07, 08:39 AM
  #30  
Rotaries confuse me

iTrader: (7)
 
My5ABaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I can see it robbing a minimal amount of power. If you want to go as fast as possible I guess just roll your windows up, turn off the A/C, and stick a toothpick in yourself and wait for it to come out without any residue. Then you'll be ready to eat.
Old 06-05-07, 11:45 AM
  #31  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
Valkyrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Japanabama
Posts: 4,732
Received 88 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
If you remember they did two different tests at two different speeds and got two opposite results. At the lower speed having the windows down was more efficient than having the A/C on, but at the higher speed having the A/C on was more efficient than having the windows down. This is because the A/C's average load is more or less constant regardless of speed, but the aerodynamic drag from open windows increases with speed. Every vehicle will have a particular speed above which using the A/C is more fuel efficient than lowering the windows, depending on the vehicle's aerodynamics and A/C capacity. In the Mythbusters tests that speed was in between their two test speeds.

Did you really need to quote the entire post above yours just to say that?
I didn't really see any reason not to.

Nope, that's not how AFM-based EFI systems work. The extra air is metered and fuel is added accordingly. Any AFR change would be tiny and simply a result of being at a slightly different load/rpm point on the fuel map.
Yes, but I think there would be more air for whatever level of throttle the ECU is seeing, so I think it's possible that the BAC could give you extra air, although it will be partially compensated for by the AFM. Of course that depends on whether the AFM "overrides" the TPS, and whether the BAC actually does anything above idle.
Old 06-05-07, 06:58 PM
  #32  
Sleeper but still slow

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
'87 turbo II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
new AC question. I turned on the A/C and white thin smokey stuff came out of th events. It was cool(as in low temperature) but what made it smokey?
Old 06-05-07, 07:16 PM
  #33  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (1)
 
rx7racerca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Country, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,725
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
High humidity perhaps? As in mist/condensation? If it didn't smell like smoke or burnt wiring or plastic, that'd be my guess (and if it did, that's bad news).
Old 06-06-07, 06:55 AM
  #34  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Valkyrie
I didn't really see any reason not to.
Nobody wants or needs to read the whole post again.
Your reply had nothing to do with most of the post you quoted.
It clutters up the thread with useless, wasted space.
It's inconsiderate to other readers.
It makes you look like a 15yo forum noob.

Need more?

Yes, but I think there would be more air for whatever level of throttle the ECU is seeing, so I think it's possible that the BAC could give you extra air, although it will be partially compensated for by the AFM.
The BAC valve is simple throttle bypass, hence the name. It works no differently to you opening the throttle a little bit with your right foot. It doesn't add "extra air", but the increased airflow it allows is metered so that the right amount of fuel is added.

Of course that depends on whether the AFM "overrides" the TPS...
The TPS has nothing to do with this.

Originally Posted by '87 turbo II
I turned on the A/C and white thin smokey stuff came out of th events. It was cool(as in low temperature) but what made it smokey?
It's not smoke, it's just water vapour that occurs briefly in certain high-humidity conditions. When the A/C is running, moisture in the air condenses into liquid on the cold evaporator and drains off. When the system is first turned on, it takes a short while for the evaporator to come down to temp, so at first the moisture in the air only partly condenses into an airborne vapour. Once the evaporator temp drops low enough, the moisture is fully condensed into liquid and the vapour disappears. I know it can give you a fright the first time you see it, but it's harmless and perfectly normal.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
03-17-22 02:46 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
04-14-16 12:58 PM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
08-18-15 05:30 PM



Quick Reply: Ok, I'm confused. Doesn't the AC rob power?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.