no MAF on stand alone..
Originally Posted by eViLRotor
You have the answer to everything! Ok answer me this, in one paragraph or less, what should I replace my V3.1 with, a V4 or E6X...? 

Originally Posted by ScrapFC
Evil Aviator and drago66: Thanks for the input! I don't hear about many NA guys running standalones for some reason... 

Originally Posted by Fritz_X
Kahren is running a stock port N/a tuned via a Haltech E6K. The car is putting out somewhere around 180+ with the new header to the wheels. Let me reiterate. Stock Port, Naturally Aspirated, 180 to the wheels. That is nearly 30 more than a stock zenki TII puts out to the wheels.
--Fritz
--Fritz
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 1
From: up to my ass in alligators
Originally Posted by Fritz_X
Stock Port, Naturally Aspirated, 180 to the wheels. That is nearly 30 more than a stock zenki TII puts out to the wheels.
--Fritz
--Fritz
Originally Posted by FC-chan
so a standalone would take me out of street-prep? Does anyone know what classes will take that?
Originally Posted by ScrapFC
According to the SCCA National Solo rulebook I have, any replacement fuel injection computer may be used in Street Prepared so long as it does not allow adjustments that were unavailable to the stock ECU. That is to say, you can have timing, fuel and redline adjustments, but you can't have a computerized boost controller unless the car came with one stock...
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
I don't have the current rules, but isn't a fuel cut defenser function still illegal for Street Prepared? If so, then that would mean that the EMS must have a fuel cut function set to the same boost level as stock... technically.
Unless there is another mention somewhere else that I'm not seeing, it would seem to be pretty open for anything controlling fuel and/or ignition. Is this something that's changed recently? The book I have is 2 years old...
Originally Posted by ScrapFC
The rulebook I have doesn't mention that specifically. The section I'm reading states, "Alternative computer control modules may be used whenever an equivalent change to the conventional system is allowed. For example, alternate computer module control of ignition settings or fuel injection is allowed. Direct turbocharger boost control by alternate computer control is not, since there is no equivalent mechanical advance."
Unless there is another mention somewhere else that I'm not seeing, it would seem to be pretty open for anything controlling fuel and/or ignition. Is this something that's changed recently? The book I have is 2 years old...
Unless there is another mention somewhere else that I'm not seeing, it would seem to be pretty open for anything controlling fuel and/or ignition. Is this something that's changed recently? The book I have is 2 years old...
Ref 2002 rules:
14.10 Engine and Drive Train
Found near the end of Paragraph C.
"... Devices known as "fuel cut defensers", and any modifications which alter or defeat the fuel cutoff when it is activated by boost level, are not permitted. "
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Well, I don't have current rules, either, lol. However...
Ref 2002 rules:
14.10 Engine and Drive Train
Found near the end of Paragraph C.
"... Devices known as "fuel cut defensers", and any modifications which alter or defeat the fuel cutoff when it is activated by boost level, are not permitted. "
Ref 2002 rules:
14.10 Engine and Drive Train
Found near the end of Paragraph C.
"... Devices known as "fuel cut defensers", and any modifications which alter or defeat the fuel cutoff when it is activated by boost level, are not permitted. "
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Well, I don't have current rules, either, lol. However...
Ref 2002 rules:
14.10 Engine and Drive Train
Found near the end of Paragraph C.
"... Devices known as "fuel cut defensers", and any modifications which alter or defeat the fuel cutoff when it is activated by boost level, are not permitted. "
Ref 2002 rules:
14.10 Engine and Drive Train
Found near the end of Paragraph C.
"... Devices known as "fuel cut defensers", and any modifications which alter or defeat the fuel cutoff when it is activated by boost level, are not permitted. "
Originally Posted by gsracer
So would unplugging the pressure sensor, which the ecu would see as a default of 4 pounds, be illegal? The pressure sensor is used nearly always for ignition control, so the overall timing could be retarded at the CAS to counteract the inaccurate boost pressure reading.
Originally Posted by ScrapFC
Wow! I didn't notice that. They're pretty rough on you forced-induction types... 

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Oct 7, 2015 08:12 PM





