2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
View Poll Results: Consider for a moment that they are both same years, same series
N/A
68
50.37%
TII
67
49.63%
Voters: 135. You may not vote on this poll

N/A vs. TII which do you guys feel would be a better DRIFTER?

Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:08 AM
  #126  
Center of The Universe's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
I don't know. I think a nice N/A power curve is nice a predictable. If the N/A had more power and LSD stock, it would be a much better drift car. For out of the box slideways I would just say TII. LSD makes up for a lot. Sliding with opendiff is a pain in the ***, but I do it.

As for grip or drift.
Grip, Duh.

The only case I could think it would be faster is when one can't get grip; a'la Rally Cross in dirt or snow.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 11:07 PM
  #127  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa
u won't blow an N/A up as easily as a TII
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 11:19 PM
  #128  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa
Originally posted by IwannaFC
now wait a minute. Notice initial D is mostly downhill. Does going downhill change anything about the whole whats faster, drifting or grip thing.
I don't kno about wut's faster, but drifting downhill is harder 2 keep control of...which is probly y it's on initial D, 2 make it mor impressive
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 12:35 PM
  #129  
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Marysville, CA
I think the N/A would be easier to master. Any slower car would be easier to master than a faster model. I never driven a TII, but I think it would be harder. I have a Stock N/A and I am drifting quite well in neighborhoods at 50mph. But I think if you could handle the TII, why not keep the power you need.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #130  
von's Avatar
von
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 1
From: sandiego, ca
I drift my n/a alot before and is almost to easy. Ofcourse i made more power than stock. ALl you need to do if your really serious is get shorter gears so you can stay in your power band more. And no a turbo wont catch up if its a real tight road course were its mostly turns and not alot of streight.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2004 | 11:23 AM
  #131  
igottafc's Avatar
RX7less **(
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,916
Likes: 0
From: Novi Michigan
Racing down hill is generealy faster because the car is going down on an angle which requires the engine to work as hard as going up hill. Drifting down hill is easier for less HP cars because when a drift is initated, the car because of the gravitational pull from going down hill, seems to pull the car side ways while drifting. This essentially makes the car easier to drift. by going up hill, your going against the hill, and drifting going up hill has the exact opposite effect of drifting down hill. Usually, to drift uphill, a higher hp car is better because it can over come the constant force of the car wanting to roll down eaiser because of driving the car on an uphill bank.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tylerx7fb
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
39
May 27, 2019 12:45 PM
immanuel__7
Canadian Forum
5
Sep 2, 2015 08:26 AM
Clacor
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
Aug 14, 2015 09:17 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.