My project fc
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: california
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My project fc
Just got a fc chassis motor is gone im goin to buy a new one. but i dont know what way to go. N/A or turbo? can any one give some insight to help me out with my project thanks.
#6
Sleeper but still slow
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by a_drift
NA!!! I know many might say turbo but I love my NA so much. The S5 NA is better in my opinion. I had a S4 NA and it wasn't as fun. Goodluck and post some pics. I too I'm getting a shell very soon to build up. I'm gonna post a thread too.
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Yes but I drive my car to school, work, the city, long 8 hr drives to So-Cal, and beat the hell out of it almost a few days a week. The motor is in tip top shape and I keep it that way. That's why I love NA. Plus there is no better response then an NA car. oh an I use 87 octane as well.
Snowball the motor you described is my dream motor. Eventually when I have a butt load of money I'll get one.
Snowball the motor you described is my dream motor. Eventually when I have a butt load of money I'll get one.
Trending Topics
#11
Tear you apart
iTrader: (10)
Originally Posted by '87 trubo FC
the reliability is close to N/A.
So many people not knowing what they're doing is the reason that TII's get wrecked and fucked up. Then it's hackjobbed in a vain attempt to revive it.
It depends on how much money the poster has. If he has alot, go turbo. If not stay NA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post