2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

My N/A bridgeport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-04, 10:20 AM
  #1  
Kim
OBEY YOUR MAZDA

Thread Starter
 
Kim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 3,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My N/A bridgeport

Sorry im too lazy to write it all over again

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=359139
Old 10-18-04, 10:23 AM
  #2  
Kim
OBEY YOUR MAZDA

Thread Starter
 
Kim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 3,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Opinions or suggestions are more than welcome
Old 10-18-04, 10:43 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
hugo20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sherbrooke,QC,Canada
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
look TOO MUCH rought....
smooth it...
Old 10-18-04, 11:16 AM
  #4  
Kim
OBEY YOUR MAZDA

Thread Starter
 
Kim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 3,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I will, im gonna work on them tonight.
Trying to make the extra ports flow a little better.
They are temporary pictures.
Old 10-18-04, 11:54 AM
  #5  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (6)
 
RotaryWeaponSE7EN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mission,KS
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Nice, have fun w/ that man.
Old 10-18-04, 12:08 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

 
91mazdarx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 1,572
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn thats a big porting job looks nice though hope it all go's smooth when it go's in your car
Old 10-18-04, 12:09 PM
  #7  
**-P I drive a miata.

 
nonameo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: albany, GA
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you should really, really think about a custom intake manifold.
Old 10-18-04, 05:06 PM
  #8  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
In my opinion you've gone far too crazy with the auxillary ports. They close way too late. They are also too large for the small amount of airflow through that small runner. Bigger is not always better. Far from it. As you already know, you definitely need to do alot of work to get those things smooth. A whole lot of work. You can also no longer use the stock ecu or intake manifold. Again, you will lose alot of power if you do.

As long as you are running a true dual exhaust on a bridgeport, you aren't making it's full power potential. You absolutely have to collect the exhaust once you get to a bridgeport or larger. Anyone who says otherwise has never done it and has no experience.
Old 10-18-04, 05:35 PM
  #9  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had that exact same concept planned in my mind, except no divider between the two ports and the bridge continuing the whole way down.
Old 10-18-04, 06:52 PM
  #10  
kill it with BOOMSTICK!

 
Falcoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: McHenry, IL
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
I had that exact same concept planned in my mind, except no divider between the two ports and the bridge continuing the whole way down.
That would be rediculous for the street for 2 reasons

1: it would have NO bottom end torque
2: it would be a 10,000rpm engine abouts, depending on the size of the bridge


Also, as a minor note, it wouldn't idle below 1,500 rpm


Edit: Then again, for the track, ANYTHING GOES!!!!
Old 10-18-04, 07:03 PM
  #11  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Falcoms
That would be rediculous for the street for 2 reasons

1: it would have NO bottom end torque
2: it would be a 10,000rpm engine abouts, depending on the size of the bridge


Also, as a minor note, it wouldn't idle below 1,500 rpm


Edit: Then again, for the track, ANYTHING GOES!!!!
Your definition of street isn't everyones

3 window bearings, lightweight rotors, etc etc etc, all the mods to make it go to 10k and that port would be a fuuuuuuuuuuuuun car imo.

Who cares about low end torque, I don't have any of that now anyways

Some people might consider my car rediculous for the street. Solid diff/tranny/engine mounts, aluminum flywheel, and large streetported secondaries with NO divider (combined 2 ports) and medium streetport on the primary, no aux port actuators or sleeves. I have no problems driving this every day to and from school for 30+ minutes.

Last edited by ddub; 10-18-04 at 07:06 PM.
Old 10-18-04, 07:28 PM
  #12  
kill it with BOOMSTICK!

 
Falcoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: McHenry, IL
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ Okay, maybe I underestimated you. Personally, I think it'd be fun for me too, but the damn traffic where I live just kills it for me.
Old 10-18-04, 07:34 PM
  #13  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Falcoms
^ Okay, maybe I underestimated you. Personally, I think it'd be fun for me too, but the damn traffic where I live just kills it for me.


30+ minutes to school where 3 days a week its stop and go half the time UPHILL makes for an interesting time

But I got used to it quickly and it doesn't bother me anymore. I am very tolerable of "unstreetable" things I guess and can adapt quickly.
Old 10-18-04, 07:35 PM
  #14  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (6)
 
RotaryWeaponSE7EN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mission,KS
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
U both have good points. Depends on how u look at it.
Old 10-18-04, 08:53 PM
  #15  
Full Member

 
Blade8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: california
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would it be a good idea to grab a stock motor half bridgeport it? i mean talking about adding a half bridge on it without porting the stock ports. would this be a worthwhile port on an n/a instead of doing a heavy streetport. would it be a good idea just run a half bridgeport in the streets? what would be the good and cons of having this setup. i personally would like a car with power all in the high end rpm's. but i would also like to be streetable as well. i would at very much least like my car to idle at 1k rpm minimum. but then again i don't want to have to attempt to reach for any power above 8.5k i really don't want to build my engine for a high rev but rather have it reach the stock limits.
Old 10-18-04, 09:27 PM
  #16  
kill it with BOOMSTICK!

 
Falcoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: McHenry, IL
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ Sure, why wouldn't it be. Actually, a mild 1/2 bridge won't put your power band much over 8k. Idle could even be at or below 1k like you want. You could even probably get away with porting the stock ports if you keep the bridges mild. See, the reason idle is so much higher on bp or pp cars is because exhaust gas is being allowed to slip into the intake moreso as a stock port would. If you look at it, the port opens so much more in a bp then stock that it's stunning. As this is the case, you get tons of overlap from the exhaust and intake ports being open at the same time. This is why your idle is so much higher.

Now that that is explained, the reason a 1/2 is better then a full bridge is that the power is available much earlier in the power band. This means that you expand your power output over a lower rpm range then the full would. If you want to know about porting, go to http://home.iprimus.com.au/bluey3/portsPage/ports.htm or get the RX-7 performance handbook. The website is a good basic reference, but the book goes more in depth by far in the behavior of the engine and what exactly the porting effects. To fully understand it you should actually see an open engine with a stock port and one with a port job to see what happens exactly, then it will click. www.nopistons.com has a good section in their forum on porting, and they show some great pictures that will help you understand this mystical process more thoroughly.

sorry to ramble, but I'm tired. Good night all!
Old 10-19-04, 06:13 PM
  #17  
Full Member

 
Rx7Boi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Falcoms
That would be rediculous for the street for 2 reasons

1: it would have NO bottom end torque
2: it would be a 10,000rpm engine abouts, depending on the size of the bridge


Also, as a minor note, it wouldn't idle below 1,500 rpm


Edit: Then again, for the track, ANYTHING GOES!!!!
Have you ever had a daily driven bridgeport?
how about anything over stock ports?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
James Knox
Introduce yourself
5
10-22-15 05:08 PM
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 08:12 PM
rxlevi7
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
09-26-15 07:28 AM



Quick Reply: My N/A bridgeport



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 PM.