2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

My Evo IX Brembo Calipers on FC3S Upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-08, 03:22 PM
  #176  
NASA geek

iTrader: (2)
 
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by OutCold
Thats what i was worried about yes, how are your calipers mounted Project7? Front or rear of the disc center?
Did u just swap sides on the right/left caliper?Wont that put the mount in the wrong position for the disc too slide obstruction free inside the caliper?

Did u cover this earlier in the thread, got a vague memory of reading something about it earlier, im just too tired too read back right now
You really need to actually READ the whole thread (all the info is there). It sounds like at best you looked through it and didn't read anything. You don't actually seem to grasp any part of this disscussion at all.

~Mike...............
Old 09-23-08, 03:22 PM
  #177  
WORLD DOMINATION!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Project7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Your mom's house
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OutCold
Thats what i was worried about yes, how are your calipers mounted Project7? Front or rear of the disc center?
Did u just swap sides on the right/left caliper?Wont that put the mount in the wrong position for the disc too slide obstruction free inside the caliper?

Did u cover this earlier in the thread, got a vague memory of reading something about it earlier, im just too tired too read back right now
Not sure I understand your question. Read the thread.
Old 09-23-08, 03:24 PM
  #178  
Senior Member

 
OutCold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah i clearly remember reading it so ill catch up another day, im grasping what i can, im not a mechanic of nature
Old 09-23-08, 03:29 PM
  #179  
WORLD DOMINATION!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Project7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Your mom's house
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
I'm just trying to help, as I'm really interested in doing this mod. I always thought of doing it, but you actually did it (front EVO's, 929 master, rear Corksport) and did the leg work in figuring out mounting the calipers and rotors. I really want to do this for a performance stand point and am worried about getting the bias correct.

~Mike...........
Your previous post with the picture certainly clears up what you are saying and is a great recommendation for correcting the which sides the calipers are located on. Thank you for the info on my oversight and making this modification even better. I'll have to find the right drill and tap and bust that out.

I'm going on feel right now for my front to rear bias, but I know you can get PV's with gauges for front and rear to adjust front/back brake pressures.
Old 09-23-08, 04:04 PM
  #180  
****** of disaster

iTrader: (1)
 
thetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
OK, attached pic might help.


GREEN CIRCLES: swap bleeders with crossover lines (swap A with B).

RED CIRCLE: drill and tap hole and move brake line to that position and plug the old hole.

Now your differential bores/pistons will be facing the correct way (small bores leading, large bores trailing).

~Mike..............
Ok this makes more sense now.

I wonder if that is essentially what they do with the 350Z/etc and why that extra blank hole/plate exists in the first place.

EDIT: what would happen if you just mounted the caliper upside down essentially and didn't do any of these mods?

Last edited by thetech; 09-23-08 at 04:10 PM.
Old 09-23-08, 05:05 PM
  #181  
NASA geek

iTrader: (2)
 
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not a brake expert, but those differential bores have a purpose. It’s like the sledding / body board scenario I used earlier were you keep your weight back on the board so the front doesn't dig (cause when it does dig its suddon and you generally go flying lol), except instead of the break pad wiping out, it digs in on the leading side and will wear unevenly. There’s probably another phenomenon similar to drum brakes were they self energize and it comes across as a slightly touchy feeling or slight delay in letting off the brakes from when you let off the pedle to when they actually release. These differential bores were there to combat these things that occurred from single pot pistons and 4 bores or more of the same size. Now if these were to correct problems associated with 4 pots the same size, now imagine how much you exacerbate the problem now by not only having small bore leading, large trailing, or both the same size, but now large bore leading small bore trailing? These are there for non-energizing/sticking/pad leading edge grabbing, even pad wear by dynamically applying more even force on the pad, and by aiding in a more progressive better braking feel. My feeling is go and install these the correct way.

I just thought of another scenio, remember when you were a kid installing brake shoes/pads on your bicycle? The brake shoes were supposed to be installed at a slight angle and NOT parallel to the actual rim/braking surface. If they were installed completely parallel, they'd grab and be touchy not to mention the leading edge would wear more then the trailing. I'm almost certain this is why the brakes have differential bores.

~Mike...........

Last edited by RacerXtreme7; 09-23-08 at 05:12 PM.
Old 09-23-08, 05:07 PM
  #182  
****** of disaster

iTrader: (1)
 
thetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
I'm not a brake expert, but those differential bores have a purpose. It’s like the sledding / body board scenario I used earlier were you keep your weight back on the board so the front doesn't dig (cause when it does dig its suddon and you generally go flying lol), except instead of the break pad wiping out, it digs in on the leading side and will wear unevenly. There’s probably another phenomenon similar to drum brakes were they self energize and it comes across as a slightly touchy feeling or slight delay in letting off the brakes from when you let off the pedle to when they actually release. These differential bores were there to combat these things that occurred from single pot pistons and 4 bores or more of the same size. Now if these were to correct problems associated with 4 pots the same size, now imagine how much you exacerbate the problem now by not only having small bore leading, large trailing, or both the same size, but now large bore leading small bore trailing? These are there for non-energizing/sticking/pad leading edge grabbing, even pad wear by dynamically applying more even force on the pad, and by aiding in a more progressive better braking feel. My feeling is go and install these the correct way.

~Mike...........
I get all of that, but what I am proposing is essentially exactly the same as your suggestion (of swapping the crossover tube and the bleed screws and tapping a new hole) with the exception of the bleed screws facing towards the ground instead of the sky. How would it make any difference to what you are saying?
Old 09-23-08, 05:10 PM
  #183  
WORLD DOMINATION!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Project7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Your mom's house
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air would get trapped in the cup bores if the bleeders were at the bottoms. Not sure why we can't flip them and leave the brake line where it's at if it doesn't get obstructed?
Old 09-23-08, 05:11 PM
  #184  
****** of disaster

iTrader: (1)
 
thetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Project7
Air would get trapped in the cup bores if the bleeders were at the bottoms. Not sure why we can't flip them and leave the brake line where it's at if it doesn't get obstructed?
Yea that's a good point too...unless somehow the location of the brake line feed has some relationship with the different bore sizes, but I can't see how that would work. Flipping the crossover tube seems like it would take about 5 minutes and solve the problem, no?
Old 09-23-08, 05:20 PM
  #185  
NASA geek

iTrader: (2)
 
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Oops, I missunderstood your question. Yes, you have to swap the crossover line and bleeders so you can bleed the calipers. The bleeders have to be on top or they wont let air escape. Now leaving the brake line were its at....... I dunno. It would be interesting to see were the 350Z places them if they are infact opposite position then the EVO and are the same caliper. My guess is your going to see them mounted to were I'm suggesting they should be re-located. Typically the brake line is at the higher position, much like the bleed screws are.

~Mike.............

Last edited by RacerXtreme7; 09-23-08 at 05:24 PM.
Old 09-23-08, 05:23 PM
  #186  
****** of disaster

iTrader: (1)
 
thetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
Typically the brake line is at the higher position, much like the bleed screws are.

~Mike.............
I wonder why that matters, if it matters at all. I'm a little nervous about drilling into the brake caliper so would like to avoid this if possible.
Old 09-23-08, 05:36 PM
  #187  
NASA geek

iTrader: (2)
 
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The 350Z calipers are completely different.
Attached Thumbnails My Evo IX Brembo Calipers on FC3S Upgrade-ed5d_1.jpg  
Old 09-23-08, 05:38 PM
  #188  
WORLD DOMINATION!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Project7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Your mom's house
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ copy that... don't want to split the calipers to get the drill shavings out either.
Old 09-23-08, 05:41 PM
  #189  
****** of disaster

iTrader: (1)
 
thetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
The 350Z calipers are completely different.
Oops, guess I was wrong on the Z caliper. Interesting that the brake line is dead center on the caliper as well.

Here are the shared brakepads with the Evo, I'd guess the calipers are the same on these cars too:

CADILLAC
Model Qty Drive Body Notes
2004-2007 CTS-V 1 ALL All available body types
2006-2007 STS-V 1 ALL All available body types

FORD
Model Qty Drive Body Notes
2005-2006 GT 2 ALL All available body types
2007-2008 MUSTANG-SHELBY GT500 1 ALL All available body types

MITSUBISHI
Model Qty Drive Body Notes
2003-2003 LANCER-EVO VIII 1 ALL All available body types
2003-2006 LANCER-EVOLUTION 1 ALL All available body types
2005-2006 LANCER-EVOLUTION MR 1 ALL All available body types
2005-2006 LANCER-EVOLUTION RS 1 ALL All available body types
2006-2006 LANCER-EVOLUTION SE 1 ALL All available body types

SUBARU
Model Qty Drive Body Notes
2004-2004 IMPREZA-WRX STI 1 ALL All available body types
2005-2007 IMPREZA-WRX STI 1 ALL All available body types
2007-2007 IMPREZA-WRX STI LIMITED 1 ALL All available body types

VOLVO
Model Qty Drive Body Notes
2004-2007 S60-R 1 ALL All available body types
2004-2007 V70-R 1 ALL All available body types
Old 09-23-08, 05:45 PM
  #190  
****** of disaster

iTrader: (1)
 
thetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is the CTS-V caliper - note how the brake line feed is at the bottom end of the caliper, close to the crossover tube. This would suggest that simply swapping the crossover tube should work correctly:



Old 09-23-08, 05:46 PM
  #191  
NASA geek

iTrader: (2)
 
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't think the EVO Brembo's have any internal passages, just the external crossover line. So splitting them would'nt be a big deal. Add some air to the inlet to shoot the pistons out, then unbolt them and they should come apart. Worst case if you don't split them, I'd still take out the pistons on the side thats being drilled and dissconnect the crossover, then blow out the shavings after its taped ofcorse. The 350Z has a different caliper, and the supply line is in the middle, weird. They also do not have a crossover line, so there must be an internal passage with o-rings to seal the two halves. Maybe the brake line can stay were its at. I guess next would be get ahold of a Brembo expert/engineer.

~Mike..............

Last edited by RacerXtreme7; 09-23-08 at 05:59 PM.
Old 09-23-08, 06:12 PM
  #192  
WORLD DOMINATION!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Project7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Your mom's house
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the mean time I will flip mine, give me a couple days and I will update with the results.
Old 09-23-08, 08:44 PM
  #193  
Full Member

iTrader: (2)
 
tinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central OH
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thetech
Here is the CTS-V caliper - note how the brake line feed is at the bottom end of the caliper, close to the crossover tube. This would suggest that simply swapping the crossover tube should work correctly:
The mounting ears on the CTS-V calipers are different and will not bolt on to the FC spindle as the Evo calipers do.
Old 09-23-08, 09:12 PM
  #194  
****** of disaster

iTrader: (1)
 
thetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tinner
The mounting ears on the CTS-V calipers are different and will not bolt on to the FC spindle as the Evo calipers do.
I am aware of that, the point of my post was that it looks like it will be ok to swap the crossover tube without relocating the brake line.
Old 09-23-08, 09:51 PM
  #195  
Full Member

 
uptotibet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'm sorry - i dont buy this whole flipping thing

its all relative pressure - the "air bubbles" in relaxed state are... 15psi?

the fluid on hard braking is at a minimum 50x that. its not relevant whatsoever, i'm sorry i dont agree at all. i'm not saying you are stupid.

i am saying, if you really believe in your arguement, present a counterpoint using physical explanations not speculation.

Last edited by uptotibet; 09-23-08 at 09:52 PM. Reason: double negative
Old 09-23-08, 11:31 PM
  #196  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I HIGHLY doubt that the position of the brake line makes much difference. It might make it slightly harder to bleed them at first, but other than that there should be no difference whatsoever. Personally, I would not do it.
Old 09-24-08, 12:13 AM
  #197  
NASA geek

iTrader: (2)
 
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My entire point was they got the calipers on BASS ACKWARDS and I suggested a way to cure it. And it seems like it may work. Several occasions I pointed out that maybe the brake line / supply line mihgt not need to be changed, but the crossover line DOES and the bleeders DO. So whats with the whole "I'm not buying it crap and show me proof " garbage about? If the brake lines don't need to be moved then SWEET, because I just bought a pair of EVO calipers and thats less work for me, but they do need to have the smaller piston lead and largers trail. Sheeeesh.......

uptotibet, I'm highly confussed on whom your talking too and exactly what about...... your post is fragmented and it seems concentrated on a small insignificant issue, whatever that may be. Want to explain what the heck your not buying exactly and what proof for what theories are being debated? Someone have a little too much drinky drinky?


~Mike..........

Last edited by RacerXtreme7; 09-24-08 at 12:19 AM. Reason: my usual horrid spelling and grammar
Old 09-24-08, 03:20 AM
  #198  
Junior Member

 
joshrulz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: brisbane
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hi there

just about to do this swap myself here in brisbane australia,
i agree with racerxtreme about the leading trailing piston setup, ill be swaping the bleeders end for end with the external crosser pipe before mounting, but im going to leave the brake line hose in its orginal spot, as i really dont want to drill and tap my brembos.
will test that as it is and do the drill and tap later if need be, waiting to hear project7's comments once he's tested this.

did you guys notice your caliper is closer to the disc on one side, i bolted mine up and found the caliper gets close to the disc more so on one side, i didnt read that in this thread anywhere i dont think. ive just made an extra spacer to go behined on of the pads to take up the additional gap, only about 1 to 1.5mm anyways.

thanks for all the great info, thats what has inspired me to do this setup, $700au for front calipers and evos discs was a bargan, even if the braking is the same the whole setup would still be worth it.

josh
Old 09-24-08, 07:23 AM
  #199  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by joshrulz
$700au for front calipers and evos discs was a bargan, even if the braking is the same the whole setup would still be worth it.
You can't mean this.
Spending $700 to end up right where you started isn't a bargain (or "bargan", in Outback-speak) no matter how you spin it.
Hopefully, you'll see a pretty major difference or else you may as well have spent the money on intake fuel-atomizer turbines and magnetic molecule aligners.
Both of which I can get for you wholesale...
Old 09-24-08, 10:55 AM
  #200  
****** of disaster

iTrader: (1)
 
thetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
My entire point was they got the calipers on BASS ACKWARDS and I suggested a way to cure it. And it seems like it may work. Several occasions I pointed out that maybe the brake line / supply line mihgt not need to be changed, but the crossover line DOES and the bleeders DO. So whats with the whole "I'm not buying it crap and show me proof " garbage about? If the brake lines don't need to be moved then SWEET, because I just bought a pair of EVO calipers and thats less work for me, but they do need to have the smaller piston lead and largers trail. Sheeeesh.......

~Mike..........
Mike,

Thank you for your insight in this thread. Honestly I probably would never have thought about the fact that I had them on backwards as they seemed to work well and I spend too much time worrying about other things like cooling and suspension settings

I'm going to swap the crossover tube, put them on the other sides (I'm worried I may not have enough brake line length but we'll see) and give it a shot. My car won't be up and running for at least another week or two but I will put a serious testing on it the next time out.


Quick Reply: My Evo IX Brembo Calipers on FC3S Upgrade



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.